Trump is not a racist

[PostmodernProphet]

If Trump was'nt a racist, this thread would not exist.

Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
I don't know if trump is a racist but racist sure do think trump is a racist....

mak2 stands condemned.......

[Evmetro]

It is fun watching you post random stuff on this thread, when you already know that there is no evidence of racism available to post here. You already know that you are not going to be posting any evidence on this thread, and you know all you can do is go around spray painting the walls in protest. I want to thank you for the great fight you put up on this thread, it gives me pleasure to watch.

I researched before starting this thread, so I already knew that lefties would only be able to post allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, or propaganda. I already posted this thread on several other political forums before I arrived here, so I knew that lefties would post the same shit, like moths flying into a flame as they do. I knew lefties would try to remove race from racism, and I knew they would claim that they already posted evidence. I knew they would never be able to reference their claims of earlier examples when asked, and I knew that the only claims posted would be faith based emotional assertions that could not be proven. I even knew that lefties would dare to do the unthinkable, which is to reference a dismissed case as evidence of guilt.

[Taichiliberal]

Stop lying, stop denying, stop stalling.....if you don't have the intellectual honesty & maturity to acknowledge error, then there's little point in continuing trying to educate you.

https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs...-0024-0034.pdf


https://www.politico.com/blogs/under...on-case-235067

And to date you still have an insipidly stubborn Trumper denying the facts. Someone please explain to this joker that a case is dismissed once a settlement OUT OF COURT has been reached. That doesn't change the facts of the case, it just relieves the accused of legal admittance of guilt via a trial.

As for Trump's racist tinged public record....one wouldn't expect those of similar beliefs and social denial to acknowledge the record.

And the beat goes on...carry on parroting in defense for a man who wipes his feet on you. Happy New Year!

[Taichiliberal]

Evmetro



You do not need to convince anybody of anything. You do not even need to be here.



I don't know, I'd have to ask you. This thread is not asking how many people have faith that Trump is a racist, it is asking for evidence that he is a racist.



I see nothing in this article that proves Trump was not motivated by the desire to see justice served, or that he would act differently if the thugs had been white. What evidence do you have that Trump's motivation was about race? Just because some of the thugs were black, doesn't mean that it is automatically about race.

The first 3 words of your final paragraph says it all. You deny the FACTS and offer supposition and conjecture as substitute facts? Get real.

[Evmetro]

And to date you still have an insipidly stubborn Trumper denying the facts. Someone please explain to this joker that a case is dismissed once a settlement OUT OF COURT has been reached. That doesn't change the facts of the case, it just relieves the accused of legal admittance of guilt via a trial.

As for Trump's racist tinged public record....one wouldn't expect those of similar beliefs and social denial to acknowledge the record.

And the beat goes on...carry on parroting in defense for a man who wipes his feet on you. Happy New Year!

The most insane item that could ever be used to prove guilt of anything is a case that has been dismissed as allegations. Absolutely bat shit crazy.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is*dismissed*against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all*allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order.

[Taichiliberal]

The most insane item that could ever be used to prove guilt of anything is a case that has been dismissed as allegations. Absolutely bat shit crazy.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is*dismissed*against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all*allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order.

For your education (in an attempt to end your insipid stubbornness):

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedict...urt+Settlement

https://people.howstuffworks.com/lawsuit1.htm


https://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/49595...imination-case

https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo...out-court.html

[Evmetro]

For your education (in an attempt to end your insipid stubbornness):

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedict...urt+Settlement

https://people.howstuffworks.com/lawsuit1.htm


https://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/49595...imination-case

https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo...out-court.html

Gish gallop. Pick one item, find the evidence that is not allegations, accusations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or emotional assertions. The most outrageously stupid thing that you can do is present a dismissed case as if it is evidence of guilt, so watch out especially for dismissed cases that are specifically dismissed as allegations by a court.

I do not believe any lefty who posts where evidence is, but cannot post it here. If the item you submit cannot be proven to not be allegations, accusations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or emotional assertions, then it is not proof of racism. If you cannot explain why the item you are posting is not allegations, accusations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or emotional assertions, then you have failed to present the proof.

[Taichiliberal]

Gish gallop. Pick one item, find the evidence that is not allegations, accusations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or emotional assertions. The most outrageously stupid thing that you can do is present a dismissed case as if it is evidence of guilt, so watch out especially for dismissed cases that are specifically dismissed as allegations by a court.

I do not believe any lefty who posts where evidence is, but cannot post it here. If the item you submit cannot be proven to not be allegations, accusations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or emotional assertions, then it is not proof of racism. If you cannot explain why the item you are posting is not allegations, accusations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or emotional assertions, then you have failed to present the proof.

the chronology of the posts shows that all you have is a parroting of your insipidly stubborn drivel based wholly on your personal suppositions and conjecture while ignoring legal precedent, valid documentation and the logic that comes from them. No wonder the neocon driven GOP and the Orange Oaf in office loves folk like you.

Your beliefs mean nothing in light of ALL the pertaining facts.

Say goodnight gracie.

[Evmetro]

the chronology of the posts shows that all you have is a parroting of your insipidly stubborn drivel based wholly on your personal suppositions and conjecture while ignoring legal precedent, valid documentation and the logic that comes from them. No wonder the neocon driven GOP and the Orange Oaf in office loves folk like you.

Your beliefs mean nothing in light of ALL the pertaining facts.

Say goodnight gracie.

Produce some evidence.

[Evmetro]

the chronology of the posts shows that all you have is a parroting of your insipidly stubborn drivel based wholly on your personal suppositions and conjecture while ignoring legal precedent, valid documentation and the logic that comes from them. No wonder the neocon driven GOP and the Orange Oaf in office loves folk like you.

Your beliefs mean nothing in light of ALL the pertaining facts.

Say goodnight gracie.

Your next post absolutely will not contain evidence that is not allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, propaganda, fish gish gallop, or emotional assertions. It will be like clockwork.

[Taichiliberal]

Produce some evidence.

Already done...you just stubbornly refuse to accept it, and try to create your own definitions to escape the reality of the facts presented.

You're done.

[Taichiliberal]

Your next post absolutely will not contain evidence that is not allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, propaganda, fish gish gallop, or emotional assertions. It will be like clockwork.

more parroting of your sos. You're done. buh-bye.

[Taichiliberal]

Your next post absolutely will not contain evidence that is not allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, propaganda, fish gish gallop, or emotional assertions. It will be like clockwork.

more parroting of your sos. You're done. buh-bye.

[USFREEDOM911]

Produce some evidence.

Anytime he begins reverting to "...the chronology of the posts...", it's evident that he's now desperate; because he realizes that he's failing.

[Evmetro]

Already done...you just stubbornly refuse to accept it, and try to create your own definitions to escape the reality of the facts presented.

You're done.

This is a very popular lefty strategy, but it has already been used countless times on this thread. It has already been addressed though, see the quote below from this very thread:

We have seen lefties post claims that evidence that is more than allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, emotional assertions, gish gallop, and propaganda has been posted, but they cannot copy and paste it on demand.

One of the reasons why lefties cannot show where they have already posted such evidence is because they will have to repost something that is allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, emotional assertions, gish gallop, or propaganda, which is absolutely not proof of anything. Lefties only have allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, emotional assertions, gish gallop, and propaganda to post, and no evidence. Since this is all they have, they just dig in their heels and insist that it is actual evidence, which it is not.