Leonthecat (07-09-2018)
The smoking gun has been ignited and delianated for you. You just cover your eyes and repeat your first post, nothing will convcince you. You are not going to accept anything about Trump, even if he admitted it . He said essentially he could shoot Hillary and the Pope on 5th avenue and not lose votrs. You are among that group. A lifetime racist and a conman owns you.
Leonthecat (07-09-2018)
There is one thing that could convince me, and that would be actual evidence that is not assertions, allegations, dismissed cases, or propaganda.
This has nothing to do with racism.You are not going to accept anything about Trump, even if he admitted it . He said essentially he could shoot Hillary and the Pope on 5th avenue and not lose votrs.
This is an assertion that is being used in place of the evidence that you cannot post. Assertions are worthless, no matter how many of them are made, or how much emotion you put into it.You are among that group. A lifetime racist and a conman owns you.
The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.
its a shame nOrdnERD can't back up any of his claims.......
Truth Detector (07-09-2018)
How would you know if you you have never seen my reaction to real evidence? Keep in mind, I have not seen any evidence that Trump is not a racist either. I have not seen any evidence that he is one, nor have I seen evidence that he is not. I suspect and assert that he is not a racist, but this is based upon the lack of evidence that says he is one. If you and I each assert our positions based upon actual evidence, the deck is stacked in my favor. If you can present any actual evidence to back up your position, then you will win this one. You will never win by presenting a case that was in fact dismissed, but you really can win this thing if you can present some actual evidence.
I have seen you and several others present plausible paths that suggest that Trump is a racist, but a plausible path does not represent clarity or lock down evidence. I respect that a plausible path is pretty tasty if the outcome validates your political ideology, but a plausible path is nothing like actual evidence. If the best you have to offer is a plausible path, you will never win this. Ugly rhetoric will not mask defeat either.Truth is you have from the first post. Trumps racism is clear as his fathers. Trump just does not wear his dad's pointy hat.
The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.
Truth Detector (07-09-2018)
You set the thread up to prove your Trumpy belief. You wanted to say you had it all figured out that Trump just looks like a racist for repeatedly getting in scrapes for racism. Who gets in scrapes like that over and over? Non racists never get charges like that nor does it happen over and over to them. Must be tough to get accused of that in court and in public for absolutely no reason.
ThatOwlWoman (07-09-2018)
Actually, it was because the MSM and the left keep calling calling him a racist as a political tactic. I am calling you guys on this, so show me the evidence.
If the number of allegations means so much to you, then why are you not talking about the number of times he was not found guilty? Isn't there something significant about how many times people have failed to make these charges stick?Who gets in scrapes like that over and over? Non racists never get charges like that nor does it happen over and over to them. Must be tough to get accused of that in court and in public for absolutely no reason.
The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.
Oh look, here's another example.
Defense contractor detained migrant kids in vacant Phoenix office building
https://www.revealnews.org/article/d...fice-building/
Thanks to a whistle blower citizen or this would have slipped under the radar, your corporate state media isn't interested.
A major U.S. defense contractor quietly detained dozens of immigrant children inside a vacant Phoenix office building with dark windows, no kitchen and only a few toilets during three weeks of the Trump administration’s family separation effort, Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting has learned.
Videos shot by an alarmed neighbor show children dressed in sweatsuits being led – one so young she was carried – into the 3,200-square-foot building in early June. The building is not licensed by Arizona to hold children, and the contractor, MVM Inc., has claimed publicly that it does not operate “shelters or any other type of housing” for children.
Defending the administration’s policy to separate families at the border in a May interview with NPR, White House chief of staff John Kelly promised: “The children will be taken care of – put into foster care or whatever.”
Whether or not these children were taken from their parents, that “whatever” for them was the vacant building tucked away in a midtown Phoenix neighborhood. It is not listed among shelters operating through the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement or on the state child care licensing website.For profit black sites for children in america.The building was leased in March by MVM, a Virginia-based defense contractor that has received contracts worth up to $248 million to transport immigrant children since 2014, records show. The company, which once provided guards for CIA facilities in Iraq, was founded by three former Secret Service agents. One of its vice presidents is a former CIA special agent and former acting director of the U.S. Marshals Service.
How exceptional.
This thread is about evidence that Trump is a racist, not for evidence that some defense contractor is a racist. Even if this thread was in fact about some defense contractor, I would still need you to clarify which specific race was the victim of racism. You must include race for there to be racism. The article you linked has a huge error in it that discredits the entire article, where it specifies that legal immigrants were the victims. Even if it had properly referenced the victims as illegal immigrants, illegal immigrants are still not a race.
Do you have any evidence that Trump is a racist, as the opening post asks for?
The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.
Bookmarks