Page 86 of 86 FirstFirst ... 36768283848586
Results 1,276 to 1,287 of 1287

Thread: Trump is not a racist

  1. #1276 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    69,497
    Thanks
    3,050
    Thanked 14,927 Times in 12,475 Posts
    Groans
    1,586
    Groaned 1,916 Times in 1,814 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Seriously you actually are that ignorant. You just blab some right-wing meme and declare it profound and true, because you believe it.
    lol.....that is so fucking ironic......

  2. #1277 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 633 Times in 521 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 112 Times in 104 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Consent decrees have been argued about for many years because they do exactly what they did in Trump's case. They get the action to stop, often collect fines and the return is they do not have to admit guilt. It is cheaper and does not tie up judicial departments for years. The problem is repeat offenders just pay fines and continue doing what they do. Need lists of all the fines banks paid, especially since CFPB. Fines are often in the billions, but how often do the people find out? The banks think it is a great deal.
    Do you have some evidence that proves that this case, that was in fact *dismissed* as allegations, is something more than dismissed allegations? Speculating on what the decree MIGHT have meant is not evidence that it meant anything more than what the court said it meant. The official position of the court was that the*allegations*were simply allegations, and they *dismissed* the case as just that. If you have evidence that this dismissed case or consent decree mean something more than the court says, provide something more substantial than politically motivated speculation and emotional assertions.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  3. #1278 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    12,016
    Thanks
    1,196
    Thanked 7,174 Times in 4,397 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 144 Times in 130 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    Do you have some evidence that proves that this case, that was in fact *dismissed* as allegations, is something more than dismissed allegations? Speculating on what the decree MIGHT have meant is not evidence that it meant anything more than what the court said it meant. The official position of the court was that the*allegations*were simply allegations, and they *dismissed* the case as just that. If you have evidence that this dismissed case or consent decree mean something more than the court says, provide something more substantial than politically motivated speculation and emotional assertions.

    My Evidence is my VOTE ... and I'm betting there's enough American's who think the same ... C-Yea in 2020
    ďIím not calling him a racist. But the racists believe heís a racist.Ē
    ~ Andrew Gallium


    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______________________
    Now that Hood is off the Agenda ... whatís Next?

  4. #1279 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    11,643
    Thanks
    129
    Thanked 5,717 Times in 3,863 Posts
    Groans
    2,377
    Groaned 1,123 Times in 1,050 Posts

    Default

    Here it is .https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs...-0024-0034.pdf A consent decree is a device that keeps the company from admitting guilt. Then it lists all the items that the Trump company has to do to correct what they have not admitted doing. It includes retraining their workers so they cannot justify the racist procedures of the Trump organization.

  5. #1280 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    61,155
    Thanks
    8,534
    Thanked 9,929 Times in 8,473 Posts
    Groans
    8,818
    Groaned 1,525 Times in 1,478 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    My Evidence is my VOTE ... and I'm betting there's enough American's who think the same ... C-Yea in 2020
    Does that make you an EXPERT on voting??

    Victory In Conservative Thought Over Reprehensible Yahoos

    Pascal argues that a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss, whereas they stand to receive infinite gains and avoid infinite losses.

  6. #1281 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    172
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Pascal argues that a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss, whereas they stand to receive infinite gains and avoid infinite losses.
    Richard Dawkins argues that it's a waste of a good life and it caused great harm to humanity. And of course he also argues that it's child abuse to teach a child lies that men will be incapable of escaping for their entire lives.

    It's the same as the fox being imprinted on the duckling as it's mother. This is why some exceptionally bright people are Christian believers.

  7. #1282 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    12,902
    Thanks
    6,222
    Thanked 5,735 Times in 3,873 Posts
    Groans
    70
    Groaned 289 Times in 285 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deplorable View Post
    Trump isn't a racist and every rational man here knows it.
    Of course Trump is a racist.. He has NO core values of any kind.

  8. #1283 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    61,155
    Thanks
    8,534
    Thanked 9,929 Times in 8,473 Posts
    Groans
    8,818
    Groaned 1,525 Times in 1,478 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by montgomery View Post
    Richard Dawkins argues that it's a waste of a good life and it caused great harm to humanity. And of course he also argues that it's child abuse to teach a child lies that men will be incapable of escaping for their entire lives.

    It's the same as the fox being imprinted on the duckling as it's mother. This is why some exceptionally bright people are Christian believers.
    And it affects you, how??

    Victory In Conservative Thought Over Reprehensible Yahoos

    Pascal argues that a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss, whereas they stand to receive infinite gains and avoid infinite losses.

  9. #1284 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    11,643
    Thanks
    129
    Thanked 5,717 Times in 3,863 Posts
    Groans
    2,377
    Groaned 1,123 Times in 1,050 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Does that make you an EXPERT on voting??
    Pascal argument sucks. You cannot fake it, If god existed he would know you are going through the motions and charbroil you. You actually have to believe in the right sky fairy for salvation. That is why it is good that God does not exist.

  10. #1285 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 633 Times in 521 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 112 Times in 104 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Here it is .https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs...-0024-0034.pdf A consent decree is a device that keeps the company from admitting guilt.

    A consent decree resolves a dispute, and it does it without anybody admitting guilt. It does not prove guilt either.

    It includes retraining their workers so they cannot justify the racist procedures of the Trump organization.
    I could not find this in the consent decree.


    Do you have some evidence that proves that this case, that was in fact *dismissed* as allegations, is something more than dismissed allegations? Speculating on what the decree MIGHT have meant is not evidence that it meant anything more than what the court said it meant. The official position of the court was that the*allegations*were simply allegations, and they *dismissed* the case as just that. If you have evidence that this dismissed case or consent decree mean something more than the court says, provide something more substantial than politically motivated speculation and emotional assertions.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  11. #1286 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 633 Times in 521 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 112 Times in 104 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Of course Trump is a racist..
    You only have "faith" that Trump is a racist, since you absolutely do not have a shred of evidence that he is. If you do in fact have a shred of evidence, post it.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  12. #1287 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 633 Times in 521 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 112 Times in 104 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    My Evidence is my VOTE ... and I'm betting there's enough American's who think the same ... C-Yea in 2020
    Wtf? There's? American's? Does your dad know you have his laptop?
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

Similar Threads

  1. Proof Trump is a racist!
    By Cancel 2018.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-04-2017, 06:43 PM
  2. 47% of Americans think Donald Trump is a racist
    By We Don't Do Vegetables in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-16-2016, 01:48 PM
  3. Another racist endorses Trump
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-14-2016, 09:38 AM
  4. Is Trump racist?
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-27-2016, 04:22 PM
  5. Donald Trump, the Racist!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-30-2011, 11:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •