4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Duped? You mean you enjoy pointing out how gossiping is the "participation" trophy for those who were duped into thinking that a Clinton was a viable candidate when in reality she could not even beat a reality tv personality? I see. Well enjoy your PARTICIPATION TROPHY while the "winner" continues to deconstruct 8 years of left wing social engineering in order too Make America Great Again.
That's the entertaining part of being on this site......watching you and your cohorts do the only thing your party can do once you've had all your political power removed, TALK. After all one of the things that makes America Great is having the right to speak freely even when that speech is based upon the words coming from the mouth or the mind of an idiot.
But...what the 1st amendment does not protect you from is pointing to (and laughing) at the fact that you are an idiot that's constantly proven wrong by the actual evidence of reality. You are not protected from criticism. You are not protected from being shamed by the words generated by your mind or the lack thereof. And as always attempted by the left the 1st amendment does not provide "anonymity"....meaning that the majority of radical leftists would never confront someone in a one to one, face to face retort....they attempt to hide behind a keyboard or in a faceless crowd they like to call an assembly but in reality its nothing but a rioting mob...there is no first amendment right to riot and anyone that does can be prosecuted instead of protected for being ignorant of the actual right of free speech.
The reality of the 1st amendment? It protects us from THE GOVERNMENT....not the private citizen who has every right of confrontation should that speech be offensive, spiteful, hateful...etc.
So enjoy your participation trophy, FREE SPEECH.....a trophy you will not always be able to enjoy if your cohorts keep nominating CRIMINALS, FASCISTS and MARXISTS for public office. So remember......your speech might be protected against action from the government, but your speech is never protected from another's right to confront that speech and the mouth from which it came.....just ask "Hillary" who was confronted in one voice by the majority of the states she called and labeled "deplorable"...the method of confrontation chosen was called a VOTE.
So by all means....continue on that same path of speech, it worked out for the better in the 2016 general election...no? You lost the white house, the senate, congress, some 3000 local county seats of power v. 57 for Hillary, and most important.....you lost the chance to tie up the supreme court for the next 30+ years with a liberal ideology. So keep pumping out the HATE SPEECH you call "freedom" of speech and see what you can lose next. The fall from grace was great, but it can always be worse...said the man bitching about not having any shoes until he saw a man with no feet to stand on.
Last edited by Ralph; 04-29-2017 at 04:04 AM.
Who'd have thought NAFTA was so complicated?
This one is a softball looking back on threads from liberals about how bad NAFTA was/is for the economy.
From Cypress in 2008:
Slamming Clinton on NAFTA
This is a legitimate criticism of Clinton, that Obama could hammer. She is completely disingenous about her support for NAFTA, a failed trade policy, and selling out the middle class.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ighlight=nafta
Another Cypress thread on NAFTA referencing John Edwards
Another NAFTA: Peru Trade Deal
Watch how Hillary, Biden, Obama vote on this. It will be very telling.
money quote, from John Edwards:
"NAFTA, which was one of our worst trade agreements ever, was written by corporate interests and insiders in all three countries, and it has served them well." -- John Edwards
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ighlight=nafta
uscitizen's comment in the same thread as above:
Yep then that is why the supporters prwedictions about NAFTA were soo far off ? Because it worked so well ? Oops they were off in the bad direction not the good direction....
There are more old threads on this topic. People can change there opinions over time. That's part of growing as a person. It's also often quite clear when we change our political opinions based on political convenience. Reading these old threads about how bad trade deals like NAFTA are for the middle class from board liberals is eye opening.
dukkha (05-04-2018)
Bookmarks