Reply With Quotewhy does it have to be a felony?Originally Posted by Rune
Members banned from this thread: PostmodernProphet |
#AMERICAISDEAD
Interesting that this is now your approach. You turned a blind eye when Obama did it, but now all of a sudden you are a fan of federalism. Well, go fuck yourself. States don't have a right to federal monies.
#AMERICAISDEAD
why does it have to be a felony?
Mjölner
Why shouldn't it be?
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Mjölner
Obama did some illegal shit,
I was vociferous in my objections to whatever I was aware of.
I have always been a fan of federalism, by the way, retard.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
rebel
perhaps you should research seat belt and speed limit laws in the USA
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
you are totally splitting hairs on this, intentionally, to cover your support of 'safety', the cry of the liberal tyrant.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Mjölner
Perhaps you should read the thread.
This was covered repeatedly.
The difference is that the feds provide funding for highways so of course they can withhold the funding.
They do not, however, provide funding for immigration enforcement, holding that to be a purview of the Federal gov.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Mjölner
You are such a fan of the Constitution, read the OP.
Tell me what part of the OP you disagree with.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Mjölner
Damn, you can really be an idiot sometimes.
It is the security statists that want this you fool.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
rebel
and I don't agree with them either. what i'm pointing out is the hypocrisy of it on both sides, depending upon what one WANTS/FEELS
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Mjölner
I agree,
the problem is if you insist one right is sacrosanct (2nd) then you must defend the other 9 as well, whether they suit your cause or not.
I thought you of all people would understand this.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
rebel
do you have some post out there of a right that i've NOT defended?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
How about the State Oath of Office for all California police officers?
"I_______________do solemnly swear (affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the Untied States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the Untied States and the State of California; that I will take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter......."
What does the State of California declare concerning Police Power/authority and providing for its citizens?
It clearly...with no ambiguity declares, ".....What's commonly known as POLICE POWER and is the source of counties and cities regulatory authority to "PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE......" -- Cal. Const., Article XI & 7
Want to deflect away from your stupidity and ignorance again? You are really full of crap when you suggest that the police's duty is not to serve and protect the PUBLIC....in an attempt to claim they have no responsibility to the National Constitution nor their own state constitution. Question? If its not the duty of any California police officer to enforce federal law.....why swear to protect the nation and its constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic? Or those who promote domestic discourse bordering on TREASON .... such as you and the left wing politicians in California.
What will you do with the information that you declared did not exist? Nothing.....you will attempt to deflect with some ad hominem bull shit again by suggesting how stupid others are for not understanding your PROPAGANDA.
Last edited by Ralph; 04-25-2017 at 07:37 AM.
Mjölner
you are working on it in this thread, and this same subject has come up before.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Mjölner
Are your retarded?
You just said the opposite, let me know when you decide what you really want to say.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks