New Study: Leading Warmist Scientists Determine Sun Plays Major Role

[cancel2 2022]

This is major news but you won't read about it in the Guardian, NYT or WashPo.

"Climate scientists at Switzerland’s renowned ETH Zurich and the University of Bern have long warned of the risks of man-made global warming.

But in a brand new study their results now appear to have compelled them to postpone the expected global warming – by a few decades!

They now claim that a weaker sun (now expected over the coming decades) could reduce temperatures by half a degree Celsius.

Moreover the scientists clearly concede that the earth’s climate system is nowhere near as well understood as some scientists would like to have us believe and that the sun indeed plays a major role after all – enough so to override and postpone the effects of the often hyped greenhouse gases.

This will be hugely disappointing news for the catastrophe-hopers and cheerleaders, who hold front row tickets to the announced climate catastrophe, which according to some should be happening already.

The Swiss scientists say that sun’s impact on climate change has now been quantified “for first time” (see postscript below).

The Swiss scientists say that their model calculations show a plausible way that fluctuations in solar activity could have a tangible impact on the climate. The Swiss National Science Foundation-funded studies now expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree."

Read more: http://notrickszone.com/2017/03/31/b....2TkqK2RZ.dpbs

Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note

[tsuke]

so uhm... their model is wrong again?

It reminds me of the christian groups which declare it will be rapture time next tuesday then proceed to postpone it.

[Celticguy]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...ngeenvironment

Remember this from 2005 ?
Imagine the vast burning blob of thermonuclear fission being responsible for our comfort.
Jig is up warmers.

[NOVA]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...ngeenvironment

Remember this from 2005 ?
Imagine the vast burning blob of thermonuclear fission being responsible for our comfort.
Jig is up warmers.

and it costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in scientific grants to find out its the sun......

the obvious 'inconvenient truth'.....

[cancel2 2022]

and it costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in scientific grants to find out its the sun......

the obvious 'inconvenient truth'.....

Actually most recent estimates puts the tab at $77 billion from 2008-2013.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...budget-tactics


Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note

[Cypress]

The full context of the research. Note the bolded statements

Sun's impact on climate change quantified for first time

For the first time, model calculations show a plausible way that fluctuations in solar activity could have a tangible impact on the climate. Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.

There is human-induced climate change, and there are natural climate fluctuations. One important factor in the unchanging rise and fall of the Earth's temperature and its different cycles is the sun. As its activity varies, so does the intensity of the sunlight that reaches us. One of the key questions facing climate researchers is whether these fluctuations have any effect at all on the Earth's climate. IPCC reports assume that recent solar activity is insignificant for climate change, and that the same will apply to activity in the near future.
Researchers from the Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos (PMOD), the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), ETH Zurich and the University of Bern are now qualifying this assumption. Their elaborate model calculations are supplying a robust estimate of the contribution that the sun is expected to make to temperature change in the next 100 years. For the first time, a significant effect is apparent. They expect the Earth's temperature to fall by half a degree when solar activity reaches its next minimum.

According to project head Werner Schmutz, who is also Director of PMOD, this reduction in temperature is significant, even though it will do little to compensate for human-induced climate change. "We could win valuable time if solar activity declines and slows the pace of global warming a little. That might help us to deal with the consequences of climate change." But this will be no more than borrowed time, warns Schmutz, since the next minimum will inevitably be followed by a maximum.


Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-03-sun-im...ified.html#jCp

[cancel2 2022]

The full context of the research. Note the bolded statements

There is a strong body of opinion that the Sun is going into another Maunder Period, if that happens then global warming, real or imagined, will be the least of your worries.

https://www.iceagenow.info/another-i...an-scientists/

Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note

[NOVA]

Are the shit 4 brains in California still trying to ban your outdoor backyard grills ?

[Cypress]

The Psychology of Climate Science Denial

Recent research has shown that climate science denial is strongly associated with people who gravitate towards conspiracy theory.

Recurrent Fury: Conspiratorial Discourse in the Blogosphere Triggered by Research on the Role of Conspiracist Ideation in Climate Denial

Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, Klaus Oberauer, Scott Brophy, Elisabeth A. Lloyd, Michael Marriott

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has implicated conspiracist ideation in the rejection of scientific propositions.

Internet blogs in particular have become the staging ground for conspiracy theories that challenge the link between HIV and AIDS, the benefits of vaccinations, or the reality of climate change. A recent study involving visitors to climate blogs found that conspiracist ideation was associated with the rejection of climate science and other scientific propositions such as the link between lung cancer and smoking, and between HIV and AIDS. That article stimulated considerable discursive activity in the climate blogosphere—i.e., the numerous blogs dedicated to climate “skepticism”—that was critical of the study. The blogosphere discourse was ideally suited for analysis because its focus was clearly circumscribed, it had a well-defined onset, and it largely discontinued after several months. We identify and classify the hypotheses that questioned the validity of the paper’s conclusions using well-established criteria for conspiracist ideation. In two behavioral studies involving naive participants we show that those criteria and classifications were reconstructed in a blind test. Our findings extend a growing body of literature that has examined the important, but not always constructive, role of the blogosphere in public and scientific discourse.

http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/443

[Micawber]

This is major news but you won't read about it in the Guardian, NYT or WashPo.

"Climate scientists at Switzerland’s renowned ETH Zurich and the University of Bern have long warned of the risks of man-made global warming.

But in a brand new study their results now appear to have compelled them to postpone the expected global warming – by a few decades!

They now claim that a weaker sun (now expected over the coming decades) could reduce temperatures by half a degree Celsius.

Moreover the scientists clearly concede that the earth’s climate system is nowhere near as well understood as some scientists would like to have us believe and that the sun indeed plays a major role after all – enough so to override and postpone the effects of the often hyped greenhouse gases.

This will be hugely disappointing news for the catastrophe-hopers and cheerleaders, who hold front row tickets to the announced climate catastrophe, which according to some should be happening already.

The Swiss scientists say that sun’s impact on climate change has now been quantified “for first time” (see postscript below).

The Swiss scientists say that their model calculations show a plausible way that fluctuations in solar activity could have a tangible impact on the climate. The Swiss National Science Foundation-funded studies now expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree."

Read more: http://notrickszone.com/2017/03/31/b....2TkqK2RZ.dpbs

Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note

Joking right? I hide more solar terrestrial physics and space weather in my dick wrinkles than these clowns show in their so called work!

[cancel2 2022]

Hey arsehole, you posted that crap before, Lewandowsky is a pompous ignorant twat so no wonder you like him.

http://joannenova.com.au/2014/04/jou...-failed-twice/

Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note

[PostmodernProphet]

just dawned on them......

[cancel2 2022]

Joking right? I hide more solar terrestrial physics and space weather in my dick wrinkles than these clowns show in their so called work!

Fascinating, your missus must be ecstatic. You should publish a paper on it!

Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note

[BRUTALITOPS]

tom you are a retard and your retarded opinions are going to kill us all.

[cancel2 2022]

tom you are a retard and your retarded opinions are going to kill us all.

You are a tumescent tit but those ones in your avatar are far nicer.

Sent from my Lenovo K6 Note