Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 80

Thread: How do the JPP Russia-phobes spin this?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default How do the JPP Russia-phobes spin this?

    Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/2...om/tag/*/index
    __________________

    This is relevant because dealings with Russia are relevant.

    Consider the absurdity of this: democrats are up in arms at the evidence-less prospect of Trump colluding with the Russians to win an election. Unless something turns it up, it's little more than a conspiracy theory or something out of two-bit spy novel.

    But we know, and they know, it is a *fact* that the Clintons were involved in a deal with the Russians that allowed Putin to control one fifth of the worlds Uranium supply. After the deal was struck, the Russian controlled Uranium One contributed 2.5 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

    That is some serious Russian collusion. And since it doesn't involve Trump it's like it doesn't matter.

    Could you imagine if it did?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Stretch (03-28-2017)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,470
    Thanks
    16,665
    Thanked 20,740 Times in 14,334 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/2...om/tag/*/index
    __________________

    This is relevant because dealings with Russia are relevant.

    Consider the absurdity of this: democrats are up in arms at the evidence-less prospect of Trump colluding with the Russians to win an election. Unless something turns it up, it's little more than a conspiracy theory or something out of two-bit spy novel.

    But we know, and they know, it is a *fact* that the Clintons were involved in a deal with the Russians that allowed Putin to control one fifth of the worlds Uranium supply. After the deal was struck, the Russian controlled Uranium One contributed 2.5 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

    That is some serious Russian collusion. And since it doesn't involve Trump it's like it doesn't matter.

    Could you imagine if it did?
    Spin what?
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,771 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It isn't about election results, it's about a whole lot more now.

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    If Hillary, Obama and their munchkins giving Russia 20% of US Uranium deposits, and the Clinton foundation received over 100 million dollars in donations from Uranium one, the seller of the Uranium didn't bother Democrats kind of curious how Trump talking to them does

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Stretch (03-28-2017)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,771 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coolbreeze View Post
    If Hillary, Obama and their munchkins giving Russia 20% of US Uranium deposits, and the Clinton foundation received over 100 million dollars in donations from Uranium one, the seller of the Uranium didn't bother Democrats kind of curious how Trump talking to them does
    https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.c...russia-uranium

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Althea (03-28-2017)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coolbreeze View Post
    If Hillary, Obama and their munchkins giving Russia 20% of US Uranium deposits, and the Clinton foundation received over 100 million dollars in donations from Uranium one, the seller of the Uranium didn't bother Democrats kind of curious how Trump talking to them does
    Because liberals have been, are and always will be traitors to this country. It is undeniable

    We are heading for a full on civil war. I look forward to it

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/2...om/tag/*/index
    __________________

    This is relevant because dealings with Russia are relevant.

    Consider the absurdity of this: democrats are up in arms at the evidence-less prospect of Trump colluding with the Russians to win an election. Unless something turns it up, it's little more than a conspiracy theory or something out of two-bit spy novel.

    But we know, and they know, it is a *fact* that the Clintons were involved in a deal with the Russians that allowed Putin to control one fifth of the worlds Uranium supply. After the deal was struck, the Russian controlled Uranium One contributed 2.5 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

    That is some serious Russian collusion. And since it doesn't involve Trump it's like it doesn't matter.

    Could you imagine if it did?
    Why did you leave out the part about it being a Canadian mining company? That was a big omit. You mentioned Canadian records, but it was Canadian records because it was a Canadian company sold off to the Russian concern over several years.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    Phantasmal (03-28-2017)

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coolbreeze View Post
    If Hillary, Obama and their munchkins giving Russia 20% of US Uranium deposits, and the Clinton foundation received over 100 million dollars in donations from Uranium one, the seller of the Uranium didn't bother Democrats kind of curious how Trump talking to them does
    You grasp the absurdity lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post
    Because liberals have been, are and always will be traitors to this country. It is undeniable

    We are heading for a full on civil war. I look forward to it
    Cool beans. What will your side do without an army, navy, airforce or marines? Is Russia siding with you "non traitors?" LMFAO, stupid southern hick.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    Minister of Truth (03-28-2017)

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Why did you leave out the part about it being a Canadian mining company? That was a big omit.
    It's irrelevant in a global economy.

    It's a *Russian controlled* Canadian company that's enabled Russia to control 1/5th of the worlds Uranium supply. And Uranium is a strategic asset. To some people, that's a bigger deal than how many hotels Trump has in Leningrad or whatever.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-28-2017)

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,470
    Thanks
    16,665
    Thanked 20,740 Times in 14,334 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    It's irrelevant in a global economy.

    It's a *Russian controlled* Canadian company that's enabled Russia to control 1/5th of the worlds Uranium supply. And Uranium is a strategic asset. To some people, that's a bigger deal than how many hotels Trump has in Leningrad or whatever.
    Really? You believe a POTUS with a financial stake in Russia/Jina is less problematic than a long standing cooperation between Russia and the U.S w/respect to uranium?
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    Phantasmal (03-28-2017), Rune (03-28-2017)

  19. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Really? You believe a POTUS with a financial stake in Russia/Jina is less problematic than a long standing cooperation between Russia and the U.S w/respect to uranium?
    You really have the partisan bug, don't you lol.

    Big Money went to the Clinton Foundation over that deal and it's like a big nothing burger to the left and the lock-step media. And what's with the 'long standing cooperation' with the Russians?

    I thought they were the enemy.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Callinectes (03-29-2017)

  21. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    28,688
    Thanks
    26,423
    Thanked 14,245 Times in 9,790 Posts
    Groans
    563
    Groaned 606 Times in 573 Posts

    Default

    the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies
    Obviously, the deal required collusion between Russia and U.S. officials.

    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    — Joe Biden on Obama.

    Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.

    D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.

    Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".

  22. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    28,688
    Thanks
    26,423
    Thanked 14,245 Times in 9,790 Posts
    Groans
    563
    Groaned 606 Times in 573 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Really? You believe a POTUS with a financial stake in Russia/Jina is less problematic than a long standing cooperation between Russia and the U.S w/respect to uranium?
    What financial stake does President Trump have in Russia???
    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    — Joe Biden on Obama.

    Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.

    D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.

    Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".

  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

Similar Threads

  1. Get ready for the new spin
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 210
    Last Post: 10-30-2013, 10:50 AM
  2. More spin....
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 11-29-2012, 03:32 PM
  3. Spin
    By Lowaicue in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-29-2011, 01:13 PM
  4. The first 100 days of spin.
    By TuTu Monroe in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 08:54 AM
  5. Bush Co.'s new spin on the war.
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-27-2007, 01:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •