Trump team communications captured by intelligence community surveillance, Nunes says

[Jarod]

This was recent. it was November,December,and January. It was multiple unmaskings" incidental to "foreign targets" and it was done "legally" (FISA)..

Ok, so? I bet Rump is worried about what they found... Maybe its why Rump is now under FBI investigation.

[canceled.2021.1]

Well it looks like Trump was right again. Will lefties apologize

[ZappasGuitar]

What are you guys talking about, Rump was right about something?

In a word, NO.

That won't stop partisan Trumpkins from playing their silly semantic word games so they might continue to delude themselves about Trump.

[Cancel 2020.1]

Well it looks like Trump was right again. Will lefties apologize

Aw, that's disappointing - you're just mailing it in here.

[ZappasGuitar]

Well it looks like Trump was right again. Will lefties apologize

Not until one of you Trumpkins can actually spell out how Trump was right.

[anatta]

none of the reports he had read mentioned Russia or Russians and he was unsure whether the surveillance occurred at Trump Tower -- as President Trump has suggested.

it's not the FBI counter-intelligence investigation.

we do know there was a lot of illegal leaking (unmasking) "widely disseminated" across the INTEL agencies

[anatta]

Ok, so? I bet Rump is worried about what they found... Maybe its why Rump is now under FBI investigation.

you should STFU . you are completely speculating without any basis of fact.
You don't know -and everything I've read to the contrary- that Trump is being investigated by what Comey testified.
This might not even been an FBI investigation.

[tsuke]

it's not the FBI counter-intelligence investigation.

we do know there was a lot of illegal leaking (unmasking) "widely disseminated" across the INTEL agencies

which has been proven to be full of leaks

[Jarod]

you should STFU . you are completely speculating without any basis of fact.
You don't know -and everything I've read to the contrary- that Trump is being investigated by what Comey testified.
This might not even been an FBI investigation.

Thats why I said "I bet..." and "Maybe".

[anatta]

Thats why I said "I bet..." and "Maybe".

this is all new from what I can digest...really no need for wild speculation.

I gave you what I can glean about it on post 2. Clearly the IC is leaking like a sieve.
++
N.S.A. Gets More Latitude to Share Intercepted Communications
Intelligence agencies other than the NSA will have to provide justification for why they need access to that data. It can only be for foreign intelligence, or other enumerated purposes.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.

The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.......
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/u...ions.html?_r=0

[Jarod]

this is all new from what I can digest...really no need for wild speculation.

I gave you what I can glean about it on post 2. Clearly the IC is leaking like a sieve.
++
N.S.A. Gets More Latitude to Share Intercepted Communications
Intelligence agencies other than the NSA will have to provide justification for why they need access to that data. It can only be for foreign intelligence, or other enumerated purposes.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.

The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.......
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/u...ions.html?_r=0

Yup, I bet Rump is huddled with Lawyers as we speak trying to figure out what they know and what they heard.

[Darth Omar]

i was just watching this. SO trump is right again?

Thingy will figure out a way to make a liar out of him lol.

[tsuke]

Yup, I bet Rump is huddled with Lawyers as we speak trying to figure out what they know and what they heard.

I can hear the crying in CNN and MSNBC

[Jarod]

I can hear the crying in CNN and MSNBC

About what?

[Cancel 2020.1]

you should STFU . you are completely speculating without any basis of fact.
.

LOL

Let's see...who does that a lot? It's someone, I just know it - can you help me out here? There is someone prominent who does that...who could it be?