Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: our fda at work, but for who

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lompoc, Ca
    Posts
    8,430
    Thanks
    1,286
    Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,090 Posts
    Groans
    475
    Groaned 278 Times in 249 Posts

    Exclamation our fda at work, but for who

    as a type II diabetic, i have been using stevia for over a year

    my doctor has several blood tests performed (quarterly) each year with no adverse symptoms relating to my organs. in fact, my HGA1C (blood sugar level) has gone down with no changes in medication... so who is the fda protecting



    In 1991, at the request of an anonymous complaint, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeled stevia as an "unsafe food additive" and restricted its import. The FDA's stated reason was "toxicological information on stevia is inadequate to demonstrate its safety."[32] This ruling was controversial, as stevia proponents pointed out that this designation violated the FDA's own guidelines under which any natural substance used prior to 1958 with no reported adverse effects should be generally recognized as safe (GRAS).
    Stevia occurs naturally, requiring no patent to produce it. As a consequence, since the import ban in 1991, marketers and consumers of stevia have shared a belief that the FDA acted in response to industry pressure.[11] Arizona congressman Jon Kyl, for example, called the FDA action against stevia "a restraint of trade to benefit the artificial sweetener industry."[33] Citing privacy issues, the FDA has not revealed the source of the original complaint in its responses to requests filed under the Freedom of Information Act.[11]
    The FDA requires proof of safety before recognizing a food additive as safe. A similar burden of proof is required for the FDA to ban a substance or label it unsafe. Nevertheless, stevia remained banned until after the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act forced the FDA in 1995 to revise its stance to permit stevia to be used as a dietary supplement, although not as a food additive — a position that stevia proponents regard as contradictory because it simultaneously labels stevia as safe and unsafe, depending on how it is sold.[34]
    Although unresolved questions remain concerning whether metabolic processes can produce a mutagen from stevia in animals, let alone in humans, the early studies nevertheless prompted the European Commission to ban stevia's use in food in the European Union pending further research.[12] Singapore and Hong Kong have banned it also.[13] However, more recent data compiled in the safety evaluation released by the World Health Organization in 2006[29] suggest that these policies may be obsolete.
    I pledge allegiance to the constitution of the United States of America as amended by the legislative and executive branches and interpreted by the Supreme Court

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    They will soon be labelling all vitamins and herbs as drugs so they can keep them from us and force us to use their drugs instead.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,727 Times in 27,215 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Good to hear from you Don I was wondering what was up.

    So much for a free market huh?

    This country is in the midst of an unbelieveable clusterfuck by the monied interests.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lompoc, Ca
    Posts
    8,430
    Thanks
    1,286
    Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,090 Posts
    Groans
    475
    Groaned 278 Times in 249 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Desh View Post
    Good to hear from you Don I was wondering what was up.

    So much for a free market huh?

    This country is in the midst of an unbelieveable clusterfuck by the monied interests.
    deah, thank you

    caught an infection and the antibiotics laid be low, but hope to back before long
    I pledge allegiance to the constitution of the United States of America as amended by the legislative and executive branches and interpreted by the Supreme Court

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Desh View Post
    Good to hear from you Don I was wondering what was up.

    So much for a free market huh?

    This country is in the midst of an unbelieveable clusterfuck by the monied interests.
    What are you talking about? This was a restriction on the free market.


    It's funny how the FDA gets attacked for letting drugs out to soon, and then simultaneously attacked by dying people whos last chance is experimental drugs, denied by the FDA. Make up your mind, public. Not everything can be a product of evil capitalists at once.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Watermark View Post
    What are you talking about? This was a restriction on the free market.


    It's funny how the FDA gets attacked for letting drugs out to soon, and then simultaneously attacked by dying people whos last chance is experimental drugs, denied by the FDA. Make up your mind, public. Not everything can be a product of evil capitalists at once.
    Yes. It was a restriction on the free market, done by the government on behalf of drug companies who want to monopolize the cure industry. Corporations often lobby government to restrict the market in ways that will benefit them.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,727 Times in 27,215 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DonQuixote View Post
    deah, thank you

    caught an infection and the antibiotics laid be low, but hope to back before long
    Glad to hear your feeling better. I miss your input.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    Yes. It was a restriction on the free market, done by the government on behalf of drug companies who want to monopolize the cure industry. Corporations often lobby government to restrict the market in ways that will benefit them.
    Yeah, it makes sense for corps to lobby the FDA to ban drugs that they sell for profit.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Watermark View Post
    Yeah, it makes sense for corps to lobby the FDA to ban drugs that they sell for profit.
    Dumbass. They lobby them to ban competeing substances.

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    This is what happens when our democracy is subverted to government by lobbying interest.....but hell.....that's been a problem since the founding of our republic.

  11. #11 | Top
    Shadow Lord Guest

    Default

    The government wants to control the drugs we get, they just use the drug companies to do it. The FDA bans things, but it ought to be the free market that does it. That or the individual states and/or communities.

Similar Threads

  1. This Ought to Work
    By Bonestorm in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-04-2008, 12:47 PM
  2. War on Work
    By Topspin in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 08:34 AM
  3. While You were at work
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-14-2007, 06:58 AM
  4. While we're at work. lol
    By Blackwater Lunchbreak in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-16-2007, 07:49 AM
  5. Good At Her Work
    By toby in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-20-2007, 01:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •