Federal judge in Hawaii freezes rumpf’s new travel ban....

[Taft2016]

You are absolutely wrong!

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Foreigners, in foreign lands, who have never set foot in the USA...

[Taft2016]

the POINT is that the federal government has NO POWER overseas. and stop projecting your cum gobbling.

Your might want to tell your beloved liberal activist justices who are trying to extend Constitutional protections overseas.

[SmarterthanYou]

Foreigners, in foreign lands, who have never set foot in the USA...

do you believe that the constitution provides the federal government the power to drone strike an african village if he feels they pose a threat to the USA?

[SmarterthanYou]

Your might want to tell your beloved liberal activist justices who are trying to extend Constitutional protections overseas.

what the fuck do you think i've been doing all these years? i've been pointing out and ridiculing the positions of ALL of you statists (this includes YOU) about the powers of the feds.

[Taft2016]

what the fuck do you think i've been doing all these years? i've been pointing out and ridiculing the positions of ALL of you statists (this includes YOU) about the powers of the feds.

Oh please, you love the liberal activist justices who invent new criminal protections.

You're one of the biggest libs on the board.

[Taft2016]

do you believe that the constitution provides the federal government the power to drone strike an african village if he feels they pose a threat to the USA?

The Commander in Chief, yes, of course.

[Rune]

Indeed...that is why the PRESIDENT should simply tell the lower courts to PISS OFF. The central government was created with the primary concern being NATIONAL DEFENSE....not left wing ass kissing and sucking up to their enemies.... When it reaches the proper level.....The executive branches authority will over ride the left wing nuts mission of appeasement. Constitutional protection simply does not apply to other nations. A point that will soon become known to all left wing nuts.

Checks and balances, RWA Idiot.

[Cancel 2018.2]

FALSE Foreigners, in foreign countries are in some areas protected by the Constitution. There are some things our Government cannot do in relation to foreigners in foreign nations.

You are ignorant. Some elements of the Constitution apply to ALL PEOPLE, some to just Citizens and other portions to PEOPLE within our jurisdiction.

Cite that in the Constitution.

[Taft2016]

Cite that in the Constitution.

It's known as the Universality Clause. Lol.

[Cancel 2018.1]

Hawaii is practically back to being a territory it's so different from the rest of the U.S. Not in a fucked up way like the CA coast is though.

[SmarterthanYou]

Oh please, you love the liberal activist justices who invent new criminal protections.

You're one of the biggest libs on the board.

ROFL, you're an even bigger idiot now. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[SmarterthanYou]

The Commander in Chief, yes, of course.

cite that in the constitution

[Rune]

Whatever happened to needing to have "standing" to bring a case like this?

No American's rights are being infringed. Who even has standing to challenge this order?

Wrong. The individual has a right to qyiet enjoyment, hardly possible when family members are barred entry.

[Cancel 2018.2]

Wrong. The individual has a right to qyiet enjoyment, hardly possible when family members are barred entry.

My goodness you are dumb. Quiet enjoyment has nothing to do with family members being barred.

[Cancel 2018.2]

Hawaii is practically back to being a territory it's so different from the rest of the U.S. Not in a fucked up way like the CA coast is though.

No it is not.