it's demonstrable.
I have no desire to engage a blatant partisan who quotes campaign rhetoric for some kind of proof, but is completely unable to refute any of the post that clearly show "McCain 's dirty war on Trump"
fake news/ IC leakage /McCain giving out intelligence over the phone is "new"McCain and WaPo and NYTimes are out to undermine Trump. There is no doubt about this -none.
This is beyond partisan warfare -
Or below it. But I'd prefer you not preposition me further. I'm not that kind of gal.
It's politics anatta. That's the way the game is played these days. It's nothing new.
That's not politics- it's a grievous violation of classified information, and McCain purposely
undermining foreign policy. you can kiss his ass from now to sunset, but the facts of his complicit
warhawking/de-legitimizing Trump remain the samescrew McCain. I don't see any other Senators engaging in subversion"McCain isn't honorable."
Excellent.
Please name 3 U.S. senators that are more honorable. Thanks.
you don't see the difference in politics vs undermining at all."McCain is using his influence/Office to undermine Trump."
Right.
As McConnell did to Obama. I've addressed that already.
i've made my arguments in debate."You can write you usual blandishments,but I don't see you refuting any of these articles."
To the contrary. It's my trademark.
- I quote the assertion, often with attribute.
- Then I respond to it.
However, I virtually NEVER follow un-teased links. If the WORDS are not important enough for the poster to quote, then they're not important enough for me to read.
A URL is not a logical argument. A logical argument is a logical argument.
See the difference?
The text is make your argument. The URL is merely for the reader to have access to verify authenticity of the source.
Why is it I have to explain these fundamentals to you?
the original links speak fr themselves despite you inability to refute them
blackascoal (02-27-2017)
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
anatta (02-26-2017)
"it's demonstrable." #31
My point precisely.
And you have NOT demonstrated it.
Such demonstration is not vulgar insult.
Such demonstration is acknowledging the facts, logical argumentation, and persuasive conclusion. "^elitist claptrap from a warpig boot-licker.." doesn't come close.
"I have no desire to engage a blatant partisan who quotes campaign rhetoric for some kind of proof"
You don't know what my party is.
And proof it absolutely is. It's what they said.
John who ?
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
read the first few posts. (demonstrable)..if you can refute them -do so -if not quit whining to me there is nothing demonstrable.
If one posts on political message boards it's expected you can digest OPs and links.
I gave the links and OPS -the links speak for themselves.
I am simply not of the mind to go back and dumb down info for you (or Rune) when the info is there.
IOW " frankly my dear I don't give a damn" if you are capable or not.
I could easily break it into simple concepts for you-but you are better off trying for yourself.
Try it.
If you still are unable -let me know and I'll do it for you.
If you presented some kind of intellectual honesty i might be more inclined to spoon fed it for you.
I do so for Rune on occasion -but he's our special needs case . are you capable of reading and discussing or would you rather to continue whining the need for me to break everything down for you?
i don't CARE enough to even bother asking you what party you affiliate with!Such demonstration is acknowledging the facts, logical argumentation, and persuasive conclusion. "^elitist claptrap from a warpig boot-licker.." doesn't come close.
"I have no desire to engage a blatant partisan who quotes campaign rhetoric for some kind of proof"
You don't know what my party is.
And proof it absolutely is. It's what they said.
Your words belie your perspective,and that's sufficient enough to call you a hack -whatever formal party you belong to.
I think that was MI6 ( Brit intelligence) that worked directly with the Russian plant.
McCain was a willing dupe -no question about that. what damns McCain on the Golden Showers fiasco is:
...
Despite his professed passion for national security, McCain doesn’t seem to mind the torrent of classified leaks designed to smear and hobble the incoming administration. As reported in New York Magazine,
...McCain “made a surprisingly impassioned case for [the leaks],” saying “How else are the American people going to be informed?”
I am fairly confident McCain is leaking or knows of the leakers -I think it's not just the IC -
but McCain's Office himself..but we simply don't know other then there is a regular spigot of leaks
flowing freely.
EDIT: we also know this -again this is demonstrable
http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/20/mc...-war-on-trump/
"Plumbing the depths of McCain’s murky narcissism for clues to his motivations may be an exercise in futility, but it’s a safe bet that we are witnessing merely the opening actions of the Senator’s dirty war against a Republican president,"McCain took it upon himself to call the Australian ambassador; then he issued a press release praising himself for it.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
"Trumph is a fake president..." BE #41, a "virtual" nobody
Hmmm"Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud." Mitt Romney
What do you know!
This "virtual" nobody is supported by one of the most prominent members of the Republican party alive today.
Thanks BE.
You have just increased my esteem for "virtual" nobodies.
I do give Romney at least some credit for seeing Russia is a geopolitical foe.
Obama was so feckless worldwide he missed even that
The trick is to manage the relationship - so we aren't friends, but we can live with each other (detente)
without default escalation of existing Cold War 2.0.
or in McCain's case reactive crapspeak like "an act of war".The old warmonger would gladly take us into hot war.
Bookmarks