Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33

Thread: SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ources-n719356


    They should write a handbook for suing Trump, Rule 1, when he says "SEE YOU IN COURT!" it means he is on the verge of backing down!


    White House is backing down and rewriting the travel ban to pass constitutional muster... something they should have done the first time.

    Checkmate!
    Trump is so ignorant he probably asked his lawyers to offer a monetary settlement to cut bait.😄

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ources-n719356


    They should write a handbook for suing Trump, Rule 1, when he says "SEE YOU IN COURT!" it means he is on the verge of backing down!


    White House is backing down and rewriting the travel ban to pass constitutional muster... something they should have done the first time.

    Checkmate!
    There was nothing unconstitutional about it. The 9th Circus was a joke ruling.

    But it makes sense to rewrite. Since it is a priority, why wait for the courts

    It's a win for Trump. We effectively ban muslimes and you snowflakes won't be able to stop it. You blew your wad

    But you will claim victory anyway

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    There was nothing unconstitutional about it. The 9th Circus was a joke ruling.

    But it makes sense to rewrite. Since it is a priority, why wait for the courts

    It's a win for Trump. We effectively ban muslimes and you snowflakes won't be able to stop it. You blew your wad

    But you will claim victory anyway
    i would really really really like the SC to rule on this case.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    17,247
    Thanks
    846
    Thanked 4,225 Times in 2,940 Posts
    Groans
    304
    Groaned 343 Times in 329 Posts

    Default

    Leviticus 19:33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not do him wrong. 34 The stranger that sojourneth with you shall be unto you as the homeborn among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Timshel For This Post:

    christiefan915 (02-10-2017)

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    i would really really really like the SC to rule on this case.
    They still can

    Step 1: make a few changes to make it lawsuit proof
    Step 2: get Gorsuch approved
    Step 3: go to SC for original ban
    Step 4: sit back and laugh at lefties

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    : ( i wanted the sc to rule on it.

    im really hoping for a sc battle!

    edit: nevermind unnamed sources lol.
    The EO is unconstitutional...
    There would be no SC "battle" ...
    The Trumph clown car can read the writing on the fucking wall...
    USFREEDOM911 Expresses one of his homosexual prison rape fantasies;
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    he may be getting several boners, they just won't be his.
    "You got shot in the balls and you're still walking!! Then this probably won't hurt you at all (as he unzips his pants)."




    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I would kill someone who didn't pay me, after I give them a blowjob.
    Does that make me insane?

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick from the Internet View Post
    LOL
    USFREEDOM911 Expresses one of his homosexual prison rape fantasies;
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    he may be getting several boners, they just won't be his.
    "You got shot in the balls and you're still walking!! Then this probably won't hurt you at all (as he unzips his pants)."




    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I would kill someone who didn't pay me, after I give them a blowjob.
    Does that make me insane?

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,426
    Thanks
    565
    Thanked 317 Times in 259 Posts
    Groans
    132
    Groaned 62 Times in 61 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buckly J. Ewer View Post
    The EO is unconstitutional...
    There would be no SC "battle" ...
    The Trumph clown car can read the writing on the fucking wall...
    The constitution applies to citizens not illegals idiot.
    Hypocrisy =
    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Trump is still blaming Obama for everything.

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpcard View Post
    The constitution applies to citizens not illegals idiot.
    National immigration policy can not be based on a religious test, asswipe...
    USFREEDOM911 Expresses one of his homosexual prison rape fantasies;
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    he may be getting several boners, they just won't be his.
    "You got shot in the balls and you're still walking!! Then this probably won't hurt you at all (as he unzips his pants)."




    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I would kill someone who didn't pay me, after I give them a blowjob.
    Does that make me insane?

  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buckly J. Ewer View Post
    National immigration policy can not be based on a religious test, asswipe...
    Who based immigration policy on religion?

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YaYurt1833933
    Who based immigration policy on religion?
    Your orange master did...

    The wording in the first part cautiously omitted references to the word "Muslim" so as not to appear to be a Muslim ban although it selected all Muslim majority countries...
    However the stupid fucks then put in an exception that specifically mentioned "Christians", obviously implying that the first part applied to Muslims only.
    That coupled with the fact that the orange clown has been talking about a " Muslim ban" for a year and Goullianni affirming that Trump came to him specifically and asked him how to word a Muslim ban so that is could seem legal, kind of nailed the coffin shut on any questions about his wanting to circumvent the constitution's meaning...
    If you weren't such a Trumtard religious bigot you would not be pretending to be blind to these well know facts about the EO's easily seen intentions as a Muslim ban...
    The courts saw through it easily.
    Fuck you Trumptard YaYurt.
    Last edited by Buckly J. Ewer; 02-11-2017 at 03:08 AM.
    USFREEDOM911 Expresses one of his homosexual prison rape fantasies;
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    he may be getting several boners, they just won't be his.
    "You got shot in the balls and you're still walking!! Then this probably won't hurt you at all (as he unzips his pants)."




    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I would kill someone who didn't pay me, after I give them a blowjob.
    Does that make me insane?

  13. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  14. The Following User Groans At Minister of Truth For This Awful Post:

    Timshel (02-11-2017)

  15. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buckly J. Ewer View Post
    Your orange master did...

    The wording in the first part cautiously omitted references to the word "Muslim" so as not to appear to be a Muslim ban although it selected all Muslim majority countries...
    However the stupid fucks then put in an exception that specifically mentioned "Christians", obviously implying that the first part applied to Muslims only.
    That coupled with the fact that the orange clown has been talking about a " Muslim ban" for a year and Goullianni affirming that Trump came to him specifically and asked him how to word a Muslim ban so that is could seem legal, kind of nailed the coffin shut on any questions about his wanting to circumvent the constitution's meaning...
    If you weren't such a Trumtard religious bigot you would not be pretending to be blind to these well know facts about the EO's easily seen intentions as a Muslim ban...
    The courts saw through it easily.
    Fuck you Trumptard YaYurt.
    It's a Muslim ban except when it's not lol?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Cancel 2018.2 (02-11-2017)

  17. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    17,247
    Thanks
    846
    Thanked 4,225 Times in 2,940 Posts
    Groans
    304
    Groaned 343 Times in 329 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpcard View Post
    The constitution applies to citizens not illegals idiot.

    Parts of it, including the fifth, applies to "illegals." This has nothing to do with "illegals", but...
    Leviticus 19:33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not do him wrong. 34 The stranger that sojourneth with you shall be unto you as the homeborn among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.

  18. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    wtf. looks like the ninth circuit wants a do over. You dont see this a lot.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

Similar Threads

  1. Guantanamo: A Day In Court
    By Howey in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2013, 05:17 PM
  2. The Supreme Court!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-08-2012, 12:15 PM
  3. us court upholds use of e15
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2012, 09:07 AM
  4. Supreme Court
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 07:22 PM
  5. Nothing You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You in a Court of Law
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-08-2007, 04:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •