Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,197
    Thanks
    9,840
    Thanked 33,902 Times in 21,665 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ources-n719356


    They should write a handbook for suing Trump, Rule 1, when he says "SEE YOU IN COURT!" it means he is on the verge of backing down!


    White House is backing down and rewriting the travel ban to pass constitutional muster... something they should have done the first time.

    Checkmate!
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    : ( i wanted the sc to rule on it.

    im really hoping for a sc battle!

    edit: nevermind unnamed sources lol.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    WAIT WAIT WAIT.

    If this is not challenged this is binding precedent right????

    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,197
    Thanks
    9,840
    Thanked 33,902 Times in 21,665 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    WAIT WAIT WAIT.

    If this is not challenged this is binding precedent right????

    The same issue could still go to the Supreme.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ources-n719356


    They should write a handbook for suing Trump, Rule 1, when he says "SEE YOU IN COURT!" it means he is on the verge of backing down!



    White House is backing down and rewriting the travel ban to pass constitutional muster... something they should have done the first time.

    Checkmate!
    Skipped over this little sentence, did you ?

    they are looking into several options, including continuing the court battle as well as signing a new immigration EO "very soon."
    why am I not surprised.
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    WAIT WAIT WAIT.

    If this is not challenged this is binding precedent right????

    You fucking retard
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  8. The Following User Groans At Rune For This Awful Post:

    Ass Man (02-10-2017)

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The same issue could still go to the Supreme.
    if this particular case does not reach the SC it could take a while for another case like this to reach the SC.

    In the meantime we could have a lot of fun with this precedent.

    We could sue Muslim Scholarships using this precedent for using a religious test for example
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ources-n719356


    They should write a handbook for suing Trump, Rule 1, when he says "SEE YOU IN COURT!" it means he is on the verge of backing down!


    White House is backing down and rewriting the travel ban to pass constitutional muster... something they should have done the first time.

    Checkmate!
    Probably to get the ban working faster. But it does show how impulsive Trump is with his tweets.

    Makes him look foolish.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cancel 2018.2 For This Post:

    Jarod (02-10-2017), tinfoil (02-10-2017)

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default SEE YOU IN COURT, or maybe not!

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    You fucking retard
    Your posts lack any intelligence. 99% are just insults where you claim someone is stupid and you never ever explain why they are wrong or misguided.

    If you're as smart as you claim, more is expected from your posts, genius.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2018.2 For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-11-2017)

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    You fucking retard
    what you guys dont get is that you cant just make precedents and not expect the other side to use them too. This is like the reid nuking the filibuster all over again.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,197
    Thanks
    9,840
    Thanked 33,902 Times in 21,665 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    what you guys dont get is that you cant just make precedents and not expect the other side to use them too. This is like the reid nuking the filibuster all over again.
    This is not a precedent that would have anything to do with Muslim scholarships. You do not understand basic stuff, are a simpleton with regards to these issues, a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    Rune (02-10-2017)

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    what you guys dont get is that you cant just make precedents and not expect the other side to use them too. This is like the reid nuking the filibuster all over again.
    You don't understand precedent.
    Perhaps yaya will explain it too you since he is so smart (and a lawyer)
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    This is not a precedent that would have anything to do with Muslim scholarships. You do not understand basic stuff, are a simpleton with regards to these issues, a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing.
    He acually started a thread on this.
    Hilarious.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    Probably to get the ban working faster. But it does show how impulsive Trump is with his tweets.

    Makes him look foolish.
    Half of everything I've ever heard from his piehole makes him look foolish.

Similar Threads

  1. Guantanamo: A Day In Court
    By Howey in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2013, 05:17 PM
  2. The Supreme Court!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-08-2012, 12:15 PM
  3. us court upholds use of e15
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2012, 09:07 AM
  4. Supreme Court
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 07:22 PM
  5. Nothing You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You in a Court of Law
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-08-2007, 04:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •