Why All The Concern With Russia??

**Mr. Shaman** · 10-22-2016, 07:55 AM

If Trumpy-The-Klown is the best candidate they can manage....how much of a threat can they possibly BE, to US??

**evince** · 10-22-2016, 07:57 AM

because the racists love him

he will help fund the idiots in their race war

**Face, Your** · 10-22-2016, 08:01 AM

Because it's the only defense they have to distract from the subversion, fraud, colusion, and felonious activity which Clinton and her campaign have perpetrated.

**Irish** · 10-22-2016, 08:08 AM

Do you not know how nuclear war works?

**Mr. Shaman** · 10-22-2016, 08:14 AM

Originally Posted by Irish

Do you not know how nuclear war works?

You Teabaggers are still confused, about that, huh??

**christiefan915** · 10-22-2016, 08:25 AM

Originally Posted by Irish

Do you not know how nuclear war works?

Does Trump not know how nuclear war works?

Trump said he might use nuclear weapons and questioned why we would make them if we wouldn’t use them

Trump said that “you want to be unpredictable” with nuclear weapons

Trump had no idea what the “nuclear triad” was

Trump said he’d be OK with a nuclear arms race in Asia

**Irish** · 10-22-2016, 08:28 AM

Originally Posted by christiefan915

Does Trump not know how nuclear war works?

Trump said he might use nuclear weapons and questioned why we would make them if we wouldn’t use them

Trump said that “you want to be unpredictable” with nuclear weapons

Trump had no idea what the “nuclear triad” was

Trump said he’d be OK with a nuclear arms race in Asia

Never said any of that. What about Hitlery? Giving away sensitive nuclear information in a debate. Women is INCAPABLE of leadership.

**evince** · 10-22-2016, 08:34 AM

Originally Posted by Irish

Do you not know how nuclear war works?

no fuckdrip lapper

it doesn't work

that is the whole point

**christiefan915** · 10-22-2016, 08:43 AM

Originally Posted by Irish

Never said any of that. What about Hitlery? Giving away sensitive nuclear information in a debate. Women is INCAPABLE of leadership.

There was no sensitive nuke info given away, dopey. This has long been known.

...on 5 August 2016 Foreign Policy magazine published an article about that very subject with a subhead that openly proclaimed it:

**christiefan915** · 10-22-2016, 08:46 AM

"...a book "Walter Slocombe wrote nearly 30 years ago" as well as a contemporaneous "nuclear timeline" examining whether nuclear "launch under attack" was "feasible." Based on discussion that occurred during the MSNBC segment about the steps leading up to the use of nukes, the article focused on the "timeline" of nuclear events based on an anecdote from 1979:

All those steps leave something like eight minutes from the first call to the White House to the last moment at which the president can act. Much of those eight minutes is lost to the task of informing the president. The first call to the White House isn’t to the president, of course. It is to a person designated by the president for this task. (Well, probably the military assistant to that person — another minute ticks off the clock.) In November 1979, that person was Zbigniew Brzezinski — then-President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor and father to Mika, who was sitting next to Scarborough, solemnly shaking her head at the idea of Trump with the bomb.

You should really watch Zbig tell the story, though the bottom line is that he recalled having only three minutes to decide whether or not to inform the president, after which the president had four minutes to decide whether or not to retaliate. At the end of his three minutes, Brzezinski’s military assistant called back to tell him it was a false alarm — someone had left a training tape running. Brzezinski went back to bed. He never woke his wife, by the way. He decided that if it was a Soviet nuclear attack, it was better to let her die in her sleep.

http://www.snopes.com/clinton-four-minute-nuclear/

**anatta** · 10-22-2016, 08:46 AM

Best start to take Putin seriously without this stupid zero sum analysis.
There neeeds to be some lower level talks going on (pick any hot spot),and start getting some understandings of our roles..

**evince** · 10-22-2016, 08:48 AM

you are a putin pony

**anatta** · 10-22-2016, 08:50 AM

Originally Posted by evince

you are a putin pony

pony! ---> look!!

**evince** · 10-22-2016, 08:53 AM

note the stormfront posters are on your side skeeze

**Irish** · 10-22-2016, 09:41 AM

Originally Posted by christiefan915

There was no sensitive nuke info given away, dopey. This has long been known.

...on 5 August 2016 Foreign Policy magazine published an article about that very subject with a subhead that openly proclaimed it:

:lol: