trump calls critics losers=SILENCE, hillary~some trump supporters deplorable=POUTRAGE

[Bill]

Furious Trump lashes out at his critics on CNN: They’re ‘mostly losers in life!’
Tom Boggioni TOM BOGGIONI

P presidential nominee Donald Trump continued his war on journalism Saturday morning, taking aim at unnamed CNN panelists who have been critical of his campaign and calling them “losers in life.”

Using his favorite criticism mechanism, Twitter, Trump wrote, “.@CNN just doesn’t get it, and that’s why their ratings are so low – and getting worse. Boring anti-Trump panelists, mostly losers in life!”

Trump’s push-back comes one day after the candidate was roundly criticized by the media for manipulating them to promote his new hotel under the guise of a major announcement regarding his conspiracy mongering over whether President Obama was not born the the U.S.

On an almost nightly basis, Trump advocates — including Kayleigh McEnany and former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski — have been taken to the woodshed for making outrageous statements while attempting to spin Trump’s comments and actions.

Friday night, CNN host Don Lemon was forced to cut Lewandowski’s mic when the Trump booster — who receives paychecks from both Trump and CNN — refused to allow Lemon to read a statement on Trump’s birther crusade.

Wednesday night, CNN panelists laughed after a Trump advocate attempted to explain how the candidate was going to deal with the Flint water crisis by beginning, “First, we;re going to build the wall..” a reference to Trump’s proposed multi-billion dollar wall between the U.S. and Mexico.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
.@CNN just doesn't get it, and that's why their ratings are so low - and getting worse. Boring anti-Trump panelists, mostly losers in life!
6:13 AM - 17 Sep 2016
8,394 8,394 Retweets

[Legion Troll]

Poor deplorables need a trigger warning because non-PC microaggression violated their safe space.

[Hillary4Ever]

[/CENTER]

That picture is a classic!

[anatta]

an almost nightly basis, Trump advocates — including Kayleigh McEnany and former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski — have been taken to the woodshed for making outrageous statements while attempting to spin Trump’s comments and actions.

I happened to catch that. Lewandowski was on a rant and would NOT STFU.
I don't know about "spin" - Trump 's words are often crude -but at least he says things

-Clinton on the other hand says nothing -zilch- except calling Trump various names for being a deplorable.

It's an interesting race. Do you vote for the politically correct nebbish who has demonstrable shitty judgement,
and offers no vision?
Or do you go out on a limb for Trump, in hope he finds his way once in the WH?

I go for the later of course -Clinton has absolutely no redeemable features. she's got nothing.

[Hillary4Ever]

I happened to catch that. Lewandowski was on a rant and would NOT STFU.
I don't know about "spin" - Trump 's words are often crude -but at least he says things

-Clinton on the other hand says nothing -zilch- except calling Trump various names for being a deplorable.

It's an interesting race. Do you vote for the politically correct nebbish who has demonstrable shitty judgement,
and offers no vision?
Or do you go out on a limb for Trump, in hope he finds his way once in the WH?

I go for the later of course -Clinton has absolutely no redeemable features. she's got nothing.

Trump has a vision?

This?

[anatta]

Trump has a vision?
This?

[Bill]

I happened to catch that. Lewandowski was on a rant and would NOT STFU.
I don't know about "spin" - Trump 's words are often crude -but at least he says things

-Clinton on the other hand says nothing -zilch- except calling Trump various names for being a deplorable.

It's an interesting race. Do you vote for the politically correct nebbish who has demonstrable shitty judgement,
and offers no vision?
Or do you go out on a limb for Trump, in hope he finds his way once in the WH?

I go for the later of course -Clinton has absolutely no redeemable features. she's got nothing.

Note your logic here: you want to take a chance, you want someone w/ no experience. WOuld you use the same logic to pick a doctor, a plumber, an electrician??

[canceled.2021.3]

Yes. Insulting the media will wreck things for trump. Because of how loved the media is

[Legion Troll]

Trump has been challenged to explain his proposed policies and offered $10 million to do so.

Will he rise to the occasion, or puss out?

[PostmodernProphet]

simply deplorable......

[anatta]

Note your logic here: you want to take a chance, you want someone w/ no experience. WOuld you use the same logic to pick a doctor, a plumber, an electrician??

oh please. I see the obvious logic.
A plumber doctor, electrician is a skillset Many presidents had no governing experience

Here is the choice:
Someone with experience who is a corrupt warmonger, and screwed up her last job horribly?
or
Someone with actual ideas on how to improve the country .

[Bill]

oh please. I see the obvious logic.
A plumber doctor, electrician is a skillset Many presidents had no governing experience

Here is my choice:


Someone with actual ideas on how to improve the country and went bankrupt a bunch of times .

No political skill set, won't show his taxes, attacks ppl for the slightest imagined slight etc etc etc

Ok.....

[anatta]

Ok.....

foot foul! you changed my quote.

These are a couple of desperados. Ain't nobody here with out deserved high negatives.

If you want to make it about personality -Trump loses.
If you want to make it about leadership - Clinton loses.

Trump is a crude dude, Clinton is a compulsive, corrupt liar. A big donor corporatist to boot.

I'll worry about those taxes when she releases her wall st speeches as she promised.

[Minister of Truth]

@Bill

Calling CNN's staff losers is not the same thing as calling 50% of a candidate's supporters "deplorable" (and the other half desperate and afraid). Now, both instances of name-calling happen to be true, but, it is generally acceptable to bash CNN/NBC/ABC/CBS/MSNBC and Fox.

[canceled.2021.3]

Trump has been challenged to explain his proposed policies and offered $10 million to do so.

Will he rise to the occasion, or puss out?

You already voted for him. Didn't you know his policies?