Amid Clinton Health Conspiracies, Doubts About Trump’s Medical Records Reemerge

[christiefan915]

...this morning,[Newsweek's Kurt Eichenwald] did battle with a Donald Trump supporter over whether the Republican nominee’s health is fair game, too.

His latest Newsweek piece really doubles down on Trump’s old claims regarding his health. Or, rather, it doubles down on his alleged doctor’s claims. In December of last year, Trump released a letter that was supposedly from his doctor. It contained grammatical errors, the fluffed-up superlatives now associated with Trump, and a heading that looked weirdly fake. Mediaite went through it all bit by bit back then. The hospital the guy works at even tried to distance themselves a little because it was so laudatory of the candidate that it struck some as unprofessional.



Eichenwald used his piece today to point out that there are parts of that old letter that are even more than unprofessional. The website linked in the letterhead, for instance, routes users to a site that apparently gives out viruses instead of medical advice. Further, Eichenwald spoke to some doctors about the old letter and found that using a personal Gmail address in letterhead is widely considered to be a bad move in the medical community.

Eichenwald wrote this after questioning why Trump’s letter came from a gastroenterologist — a specialty doctor — instead of a general doctor like Clinton’s:

Unlike the Clinton letter, it does not contain a full medical history for Trump. The letter also has problems with sentence structure and major typographical errors, such as the opening line, “To Whom My Concern.” Most amusing, it says that his medical examination of Trump has “only positive results.” In medical terms, if the test is positive, it confirms the existence of disease. Is this doctor saying Trump has every medical ailment that could be found in examination? Does he not know the meaning of the word? Or, as I suspect, was the letter written by someone in the Trump campaign?


http://www.mediaite.com/online/amid-...ords-reemerge/

[christiefan915]

Pull the other one, it's got bells on.

"To Whom MY Concern"

"complete medical examination that showed only positive results"

"laboratory test results were astonishingly excellent"

"physical strength and stamina are extraordinary"

"will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency"

[NOVA]

alleged doctor’s claims

grammatical errors

the fluffed-up superlatives

heading that looked weirdly fake

apparently gives out viruses instead of medical advice

has problems with sentence structure

major typographical errors

as I suspect,



Talk about conjecture mixed with a little crystal ball reading and opinion.....was your post done by some English
teacher correcting an essays grammar and punctuation or is it just some flunky's opinion and attempt to some educated.....?


You claim I have a blind spot when it comes to Trump?...but of course you don't have a blind spot when it comes to Hillary....that about right?

[christiefan915]

alleged doctor’s claims

grammatical errors

the fluffed-up superlatives

heading that looked weirdly fake

apparently gives out viruses instead of medical advice

has problems with sentence structure

major typographical errors

as I suspect,



Talk about conjecture mixed with a little crystal ball reading and opinion.....was your post done by some English
teacher correcting an essays grammar and punctuation or is it just some flunky's opinion and attempt to some educated.....?


You claim I have a blind spot when it comes to Trump?...but of course you don't have a blind spot when it comes to Hillary....that about right?

What official medical report uses terminology like that, especially the last one: "will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency."

The doc would have had to be around since Washington to make a claim like that.

[Legion Troll]

Both candidate should required to undergo a thorough examination at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center by military doctors and the results made public.

[christiefan915]

Both candidate should required to undergo a thorough examination at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center by military doctors and the results made public.

I agree, and I'd also like them both to have a mental evaluation that would be made public.

[Legion Troll]

I agree, and I'd also like them both to have a mental evaluation that would be made public.

But will Blabo's hero agree?

Poor Blabo.

[christiefan915]

But will Blabo's hero agree?

Poor Blabo.

I don't think he'd do it. He'd evade, just like he's evading the release of his tax returns.

[Legion Troll]

I don't think he'd do it. He'd evade, just like he's evading the release of his tax returns.

Isn't he also trying to evade the debates?

[christiefan915]

Isn't he also trying to evade the debates?

He sure is. And his acolytes are buying the NFL excuse.

[Legion Troll]

He sure is. And his acolytes are buying the NFL excuse.

Loyal lapdoggies will lap up anything and yip for more.

[Legionthecat]

...this morning,[Newsweek's Kurt Eichenwald] did battle with a Donald Trump supporter over whether the Republican nominee’s health is fair game, too.

His latest Newsweek piece really doubles down on Trump’s old claims regarding his health. Or, rather, it doubles down on his alleged doctor’s claims. In December of last year, Trump released a letter that was supposedly from his doctor. It contained grammatical errors, the fluffed-up superlatives now associated with Trump, and a heading that looked weirdly fake. Mediaite went through it all bit by bit back then. The hospital the guy works at even tried to distance themselves a little because it was so laudatory of the candidate that it struck some as unprofessional.



Eichenwald used his piece today to point out that there are parts of that old letter that are even more than unprofessional. The website linked in the letterhead, for instance, routes users to a site that apparently gives out viruses instead of medical advice. Further, Eichenwald spoke to some doctors about the old letter and found that using a personal Gmail address in letterhead is widely considered to be a bad move in the medical community.

Eichenwald wrote this after questioning why Trump’s letter came from a gastroenterologist — a specialty doctor — instead of a general doctor like Clinton’s:

Unlike the Clinton letter, it does not contain a full medical history for Trump. The letter also has problems with sentence structure and major typographical errors, such as the opening line, “To Whom My Concern.” Most amusing, it says that his medical examination of Trump has “only positive results.” In medical terms, if the test is positive, it confirms the existence of disease. Is this doctor saying Trump has every medical ailment that could be found in examination? Does he not know the meaning of the word? Or, as I suspect, was the letter written by someone in the Trump campaign?


http://www.mediaite.com/online/amid-...ords-reemerge/

Sounds to me like Doctor John Miller.

[Bill]

He looks healthy, not a day over 90..

[Legionthecat]

"...recent complete medical examination, that showed only positive results."

Think about it. In real medical parlance. A positive test result means you are positive for an illness.
A test for heart disease, that yields a "positive result", means you have heart disease.
"only positive results" means that he has everything he was tested for.
LOL.

[christiefan915]

Now this is just priceless. Here's the letter again:



Note "Jacob Bornstein MD" on this letter dated December 4, 2015. However, Jacob Bornstein MD DIED on February 18, 2010. What a champ! Still soldiering on after 6+ years of pushing up daisies!

JACOB BORNSTEIN

Obituary