Members banned from this thread: USFREEDOM911, PostmodernProphet, Granule, CFM and Seahawk


Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion access law

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    16,285
    Thanks
    8,930
    Thanked 4,912 Times in 3,648 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,102 Times in 1,032 Posts

    Default Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion access law

    Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion access law


    Washington (CNN)In a dramatic ruling, the Supreme Court on Monday threw out a Texas abortion access law in a victory to supporters of abortion rights who argued it would have shuttered all but a handful of clinics in the state.

    The 5-3 ruling is the most significant decision from the Supreme Court on abortion in two decades and could serve to deter other states from passing so-called "clinic shutdown" laws.
    In joining with the liberal justices, perennial swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy helped deliver a victory to abortion rights activists and signaled the court's majority in their favor could continue regardless of the presidential election and the filling of the empty seat on the bench left by the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.
    Supreme Court issues in 2016
    Photos: Supreme Court issues in 2016
    Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, which was joined in full by Kennedy. Breyer wrote that despite arguments that the restrictions were designed to protect women's health, the reality is that they merely amounted to burdening women who seek abortions.
    "There was no significant health-related problem that the new law helped to cure," Breyer wrote. "We agree with the District Court that the surgical-center requirement, like the admitting-privileges requirement, provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an "undue burden" on their constitutional right to do so."
    Abortion in America: More complex than you think
    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined Breyer's opinion and wrote a brief concurring opinion, which focused on what she called women in "desperate circumstances."
    "When a State severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances may resort to unlicensed rogue practitioners, faute de mieux, at great risk to their health and safety," she wrote.
    Political implications
    The ruling will have reverberations on the presidential election, where the fate of the Supreme Court has been front-and-center after the death of Scalia in February. Senate Republicans have refused to act on President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, leaving the court with eight justices.
    Supreme Court vacates former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's conviction
    But Monday's ruling signals that even if Republicans were to name that replacement, the court still has a five-justice majority that could rule against abortion restrictions. And if Hillary Clinton were to win, the majority could even grow.
    Hillary Clinton immediately praised the ruling.
    "SCOTUS's decision is a victory for women in Texas and across America. Safe abortion should be a right—not just on paper, but in reality. -H"

    SCOTUS's decision is a victory for women in Texas and across America. Safe abortion should be a right—not just on paper, but in reality. -H

    President Barack Obama said he is "pleased" by the ruling.


    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/27/politics/supreme-court-abortion-texas/

    Biggest abortion decision in 25 years and Scalia's opinion would not have changed it.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    23,116
    Thanks
    1,050
    Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
    Groans
    2,732
    Groaned 648 Times in 283 Posts

    Default

    The same JPP cons who were jubilant about the SCOTUS ruling last week will now condemn them as "activist judges" and "black-robed tyrants", won't they?



  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    16,285
    Thanks
    8,930
    Thanked 4,912 Times in 3,648 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,102 Times in 1,032 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion Troll View Post
    The same JPP cons who were jubilant about the SCOTUS ruling last week will now condemn them as "activist judges" and "black-robed tyrants", won't they?
    I believe that would be an accurate prediction.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    23,116
    Thanks
    1,050
    Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
    Groans
    2,732
    Groaned 648 Times in 283 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leonthecat View Post
    I believe that would be an accurate prediction.
    I believe it is, Brother Leon. I'm gratified that you concur.

    Do you suppose cons will deny it and start a copycat thread?

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion Troll View Post
    The same JPP cons who were jubilant about the SCOTUS ruling last week will now condemn them as "activist judges" and "black-robed tyrants", won't they?


    i support the decision. seems very reasonable.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Leonthecat (06-27-2016)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    16,285
    Thanks
    8,930
    Thanked 4,912 Times in 3,648 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,102 Times in 1,032 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by It's snacktime View Post
    i support the decision. seems very reasonable.
    Obama will be pleased.

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    23,116
    Thanks
    1,050
    Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
    Groans
    2,732
    Groaned 648 Times in 283 Posts

    Default

    Grind seems to be the only one pleased by this momentous decision, Brother Leon.

    Why do you suppose the other JPP righties aren't adding their paeans of approval?

Similar Threads

  1. Texas AG Paxton Lies Explaining Lawsuit Over School Toilet Access
    By zappasguitar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-27-2016, 12:15 PM
  2. Replies: 623
    Last Post: 02-18-2016, 08:39 AM
  3. Federal appeals court reinstates most Texas abortion restrictions
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-01-2013, 05:35 AM
  4. APP - Supreme Court strikes down anti-prostitution requirement for AIDS Funding
    By tekkychick in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-21-2013, 02:47 AM
  5. Supreme Court strikes down DC gun ban
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 11:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •