The coming economy

[Cancel7]

duhla you fat cow
get your head shoved up your spinster ass on economics you inevitably fall back on a grammar gotcha.
Which is indicative of you lack of Any skill in the subject area.

Top i know of nothing you've ever said that even indicated you know jack shit about economics.

Top, you're rich, beautiful, thin, a tennis champ, you have a beautiful wife with the body of a swimsuit model....Top why are you on here all weekend making fun of the less fortunate?

Gosh even a fat girl like me had better things to do most of the weekend.

Strange. Oh well, maybe muffy will pop by with tad and you can hit the courts.

[Topspin]

Top, you're rich, beautiful, thin, a tennis champ, you have a beautiful wife with the body of a swimsuit model....Top why are you on here all weekend making fun of the less fortunate?

And yet I teach morons on the internet as well, your talking out your ass as usual Dhula.
Unlike you I have put out my info as proof.
I've listed at least a dozen stocks that went up over 10% after my post.
the fact the most of you are too stupid too soak it up is not surprising.
AC, do you ever check anything??

[Topspin]

and duhla GDP is a measure of total output not profits!!!!
No charge.

[Topspin]

Between 1980 and the end of 2006, the real net worth of American households grew at about 4 percent per year, while overall income grew at about 3 percent per year. As a result, the ratio of household real net worth to annual disposable income rose from about 4.4 to 1 in the early 1980s to 5.7 to 1 in 2006. A peak ratio at about 6 to 1 occurred in 2000 after the spike in the American stock market.

[Beefy]

Between 1980 and the end of 2006, the real net worth of American households grew at about 4 percent per year, while overall income grew at about 3 percent per year. As a result, the ratio of household real net worth to annual disposable income rose from about 4.4 to 1 in the early 1980s to 5.7 to 1 in 2006. A peak ratio at about 6 to 1 occurred in 2000 after the spike in the American stock market.

Theres no way you wrote that.

If you did, it would look more like this:

bitween 1986 and the endof 200^, real net american houshold percent river captain. Overall 3% income annual caloie.

[uscitizen]

Anything that sputter does not agree with is stupit.

[Epicurus]

Theres no way you wrote that.

If you did, it would look more like this:

bitween 1986 and the endof 200^, real net american houshold percent river captain. Overall 3% income annual caloie.

Bahaha

[Socrtease]

This is just a portion of the article. Top since you have the MBA show us ALL where this guy is wrong. Instead of insulting. Obviously this guy has enough on the ball that he was assistance sec treas. Show me where his education is lacking. That is ALL I ask.

Unlike the post-depression generation of US economists, recent generations of economists have been indoctrinated with confidence in business. They believe that business knows best and that the free market will prevent or correct any mistakes. Many economists today are well paid shills for special interests. Others, simply careless, have assumed that statistical measures of high rates of US productivity and GDP growth were indications of the benefits that offshoring was bringing to Americans.

Only a few economists, such as myself and Charles McMillion, noticed the inconsistency between alleged high rates of productivity and GDP growth on one hand and stagnant real median incomes and rising income inequality on the other. Somehow the US economy was having GDP and productivity growth that was not showing up in growth in the incomes of Americans.

Thanks to economist Susan N. Houseman and the March 22 issue of Business Week, we now know, as I reported in the print edition of CounterPunch (June 1-15, 2007) and on online at vdare.com, that much of the growth in US productivity and GDP was an illusion created by statistics that mistakenly attributed productivity gains achieved abroad to the US economy.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

[uscitizen]

but somehow sputter knows more than Paul Roberts. sheesh. Yeah and I believe in the tooth fairy

[Cypress]

Unlike the post-depression generation of US economists, recent generations of economists have been indoctrinated with confidence in business......

Only a few economists, such as myself and Charles McMillion, noticed the inconsistency between alleged high rates of productivity and GDP growth on one hand and stagnant real median incomes and rising income inequality on the other. Somehow the US economy was having GDP and productivity growth that was not showing up in growth in the incomes of Americans.


Shit I had a long running debate with a bush voter on this board, about the stagnation of the middle class, wages, and income...particularly within the last 30 years. I ended up driving the poor bush voter insane and getting IA'd.

But, thanks. I think its pretty self evident that a large swath of middle income america has been stagnating.

[uscitizen]

Cypress, you must be GED bowling for trailer trash like me

[Cypress]

Cypress, you must be GED bowling for trailer trash like me

I'm amazed sometimes, how us "ged" types weren't fooled into the iraq war or fooled into voting for Bush twice.

[uscitizen]

I'm amazed sometimes, how us "ged" types weren't fooled into the iraq war or fooled into voting for Bush twice.

yeah and we were the stupit ones according to sputter. simply amazing that someone is stupit enough to rationalize that in his beady little mind.

[Topspin]

castro you read too many leftist blogs
Look at the median net worth growth over the last decade or two.
Up, up, and UP.

[evince]

11/24/2011



I told you guys it was going to get bad.


you on the right just kept saying me and uscitizen were fools