Reply With QuoteFACTS dont disappear because you mock themOriginally Posted by PostmodernProphet
remember Robmoney DIDNT win by 5
Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Truth Detector and canceled.2021.1 |
Mjölner
Yet you did, and incorrectly unless you are saying you support CU. FYI nothing moderate about supporting CU. That is a far right position.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Truthmatters
FACTS dont disappear because you mock them
remember Robmoney DIDNT win by 5
Catalyst
Read it yourself, pages 69-77. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions...4-556_3204.pdf
It's not "intellectually brilliant" to lash out at your fellow justices with cheap insults just because you disagree with them.
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
fully immersed in faith..
that which does not exist, need not disappear.....
100% recycled karma
It's not "support " or "don't support". It's whether CU is the proper interpretation of money=political speech.
Absent public financing/Amending the Constitution it is; there is no Constitutional way to limit political spending - it's why McCain/Feingold was overturned.
I support public financing
fully immersed in faith..
hell yes......if the SC had that feature I would have "thanked" him.......
Truthmatters
fully immersed in faith..
sorry dear.....we don't let the racists define what racism is around here......
cawacko (02-20-2016)
Truthmatters
A fine upstanding poster
He won't any more. He's gone to the Big Ranch, and he' ain't coming back.
Truthmatters
U. S. NAVY Veteran
Example 1.....
The term "affirmative action" was first used in the United States in "Executive Order No.10925",[6] signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961, which included a provision that government contractors "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."[7] In 1967, gender was added to the anti-discrimination listI will give just three out of many possible examples. In affirmative action cases, Scalia insisted over and over again that the 14th Amendment required the government to follow color-blind policies. There is no basis for this claim in either the text or history of the amendment. Indeed Scalia simply ignored a rich historical record that reveals, among other things, that at the time the amendment was ratified, the federal government passed several laws granting special benefits to African-Americans, and only African-Americans. No honest originalist reading of the Constitution would conclude that it prohibits affirmative action programs, but Justice Scalia was only interested in originalism to the extent that it advanced his political preferences.
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Any person means any person, regardless of race
Dumbed down for liberals.... color blind policies just as Scalia believed.....
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Banned
Scalia was a racist
And the racist pieces of shit here loved him
U. S. NAVY Veteran
Example 2
Similarly, the men who drafted and ratified the First Amendment would, it’s safe to say, been shocked out of their wits if someone had told them they were granting the same free speech rights to corporations they were giving to persons. Again as a historical matter, this idea is an almost wholly modern invention: indeed it would be hard to come up with a purer example of treating the Constitution as a “living document,” the meaning of which changes as social circumstances change. In other words, it would be difficult to formulate a clearer violation of Scalia’s claim that the Constitution should be treated as if it is “dead dead dead.”
Corporation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation
A corporation is a company or group of people authorized to act as a single entity (legally a person) and recognized as such in law. Early incorporated entities were established by charter (i.e. by an ad hoc act granted by a monarch or passed by a parliament or legislature).
Despite not being human beings, corporations, as far as the law is concerned, are legal persons, and have many of the same rights and responsibilities as natural persons do. Corporations can exercise human rights against real individuals and the state,[4][5] and they can themselves be responsible for human rights violations.
A collection of many individuals united into one body, under a special denomination, having perpetual succession under an artificial form, and vested, by policy of the law, with the capacity of acting, in several respects, as an individual, particularly of taking and granting property, of contracting obligations, and of suing and being sued, of enjoying privileges and immunities in common, and of exercising a variety of political rights, more or less extensive, according to the design of its institution, or the powers conferred upon it, either at the time of its creation, or at any subsequent period of its existence.
— A Treatise on the Law of Corporations, Stewart Kyd (1793–1794)
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Banned
Statements you make aren't facts because you make them.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks