FUCK THE POLICE (03-27-2014)
Seventeen and a half years. Not a flicker of global warming. The RSS satellite record, the first of the five global-temperature datasets to report its February value, shows a zero trend for an impressive 210 months. The graph below shows no global warming at all for 17 years 6 months:
1: This graph is highly topical. It is right up to date. Remote Sensing Systems, Inc. (RSS) is one of the two satellite-based datasets (the other is the University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH). And RSS is one of the five standard global temperature datasets, which include the two satellite datasets and the three terrestrial datasets – Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS); the Hadley Centre/CRU dataset, version 4 (HadCRUT4); and the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). As this month, RSS is usually the first to report, and its latest monthly value, for February 2014, became available just hours ago.
2: The satellite datasets are based on measurements made by the most accurate thermometers available – platinum resistance thermometers, which not only measure temperature at various altitudes above the Earth’s surface via microwave sounding units but also constantly calibrate themselves by measuring the known temperature of the cosmic background radiation, which is 1% of the freezing point of water, or just 2.73 degrees above absolute zero. It was by measuring minuscule variations of the cosmic background radiation that the NASA anisotropy probe enabled the age of the Universe to be determined: it is 13.82 billion years.
3: The graph is accurate. The data are lifted monthly directly from the RSS website. They are read down from the text file by a computer algorithm and plotted automatically using an advanced routine that automatically adjusts the aspect ratio of the data window at both axes so as to show the data at maximum size. The latest monthly data point is visually inspected to ensure that it has been correctly positioned. The light blue trend line plotted beneath the dark blue spline-curve showing the actual data is calculated by the method of least-squares linear regression, which determines the y-intercept and slope of the line via two well-established and functionally identical equations that are compared with one another to ensure no discrepancy between them. Least-squares linear regression is used by the IPCC and by most other agencies for determining global temperature trends. Interestingly, it is recommended by Professor Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia in one of the Climategate emails, so no one on the true-believing side will challenge its appropriateness. The reliability of the trend calculation by the algorithm was verified by Dr Stephen Farish, Professor of Epidemiological Statistics at the University of Melbourne.
4: The graph is news. Not only is it very recent: it is also something that the mainstream news media very seldom reveal. They tend to keep the now embarrassingly long hiatus in global warming secret.
http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/03/...or-210-months/
FUCK THE POLICE (03-27-2014)
More science for the warmers to deny.... but there is a concensus that this scam is dead.
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
FUCK THE POLICE (03-27-2014)
FUCK THE POLICE (03-27-2014)
You know, Tom, if deniers were right, you wouldn't have to spam a brand new "disproof" every single day. Just one would do.
cancel2 2022 (03-27-2014)
BRUTALITOPS (03-27-2014)
You call it spamming, I call it setting the record straight. I can see that you are at stage 2 (anger) which is all good. Let it out then the healing process can begin. To quote Gloria Steinem, a feminist icon that I'm sure is revered down in Mississippi, “the truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.”
Last edited by cancel2 2022; 03-27-2014 at 03:17 AM.
FUCK THE POLICE (03-28-2014)
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
I would have thought so as well but as so many warmers have adopted this as doctrine they are blinded by their zeal. Once you realize that CO2 cannot do the voodoo its claimed to do it becomes a no brainer. All the rest is just the clatter of the house of cards tumbling.
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
except we get non stop fear mongering from the religious zealots that attend the church of man made global warming... funny thing is... they don't produce any data to support their position. When the non stop fear mongering ceases, then people will stop debunking their nonsense.
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Anyone watch the 'winter' Olympics?
Nope...no warming anywhere.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
ZappasGuitar (03-27-2014)
Or is this just proof that EPA regulations are actually working?
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
lmao... do you understand how GLOBAL warming works? It does not mean that everyone has the same temperatures or that there won't be unusual weather. It means that ON AVERAGE the temperatures around the entire planet have not continued increasing as the fear mongers projected.
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Bookmarks