Members banned from this thread: evince and zappasguitar


Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Site Cleared Of Homes By Eminent Domain Remains Empty Eight Years Later

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Thumbs down Site Cleared Of Homes By Eminent Domain Remains Empty Eight Years Later

    It has been a little over eight years since the U.S. Supreme Court decided that homeowners in New London, Conn., had no property rights. In 2005, residents in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood of New London were told they had to abandon their homes so the city’s government could demolish them and hand the property over to developers to build hotels, health clubs and new condominiums.


    The Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s ruling, with a 5-4 decision, that the Fifth Amendment’s “taking clause” could extend to city governments that wanted to remove old structures and build something for the betterment of the community. Traditionally, such seizure of personal property, known as “eminent domain," had been limited to a government’s need to build facilities like schools or police stations, according to a recent story in the Boston Globe.


    Today, the land that was cleared remains a 90-acre barren field with waist-high weeds.
    http://www.opposingviews.com/i/socie...ht-years-later


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Minister of Truth (03-20-2014)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    17,247
    Thanks
    846
    Thanked 4,225 Times in 2,940 Posts
    Groans
    304
    Groaned 343 Times in 329 Posts

    Default

    If they were going to build a sports stadium grind, the fake libertarian, would not mind, but...




    I am curious how some of the neo confederates or those who reject incorporation argue against this?
    Leviticus 19:33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not do him wrong. 34 The stranger that sojourneth with you shall be unto you as the homeborn among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.

  4. The Following User Groans At Timshel For This Awful Post:

    BRUTALITOPS (03-20-2014)

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Timshel For This Post:

    zappasguitar (03-20-2014)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default



    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

Similar Threads

  1. Richmond, CA my invoke eminent domain to address forclosures
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-13-2013, 10:36 PM
  2. Ohio Court Rejects Eminent Domain
    By MasterChief in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 02:26 AM
  3. Eminent Domain Abuse
    By LadyT in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 05-15-2008, 02:50 PM
  4. Eminent Domain Bites Back
    By Timshel in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 11:16 PM
  5. pre-emptive strike against eminent domain
    By LadyT in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-01-2007, 12:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •