Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    A real classical conservative Republican first and foremost believes that America was not founded as a democracy, but rather to be a Representative Constitutional Republic whereby the people were to be governed by elected representation who’s service, loyalty and political endeavors were solely and strictly harnessed to the constitutional rule of law and not any whims and or prejudices of any majority of the population.

    A real classical conservative Republican is anti-war who understands that most wars are simply racketeering scams except when attacked and then he/she is only willing to put the Republic into a war by a congressional declaration of war as mandated by the Constitution.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a constitutional “liberal”, i. e. one who promotes and is loyal to the very liberal guarantees of “individual liberty” as mandated by the Constitution’s Bill Of Rights and amendments to the Constitution that promote and guarantee individual liberty.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a true libertarian, (small l) who promotes State’s Rights, Gay Rights, Religious Rights, Gun Rights, Human Rights, Minority Rights, Majority Rights, Collective Rights and Individual Rights. He/she does not waver from the support of All Rights for humans as long as no Right of others is violated.

    A real classical conservative Republican opposes the unconstitutional idiot failed authoritarian Drug War, unconstitutional federal corporate and social welfare and all actions taken by the federal government not authorized by the Constitution.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a State’s Rights activist who knows that our Constitution gives the powers to the States and the people respectively to do all things not enumerated and authorized by the Constitution for the federal government to do thereby creating a “several States Laboratory” of political actions, (not in violation of the national Constitution), that by their very definition and nature will decide the very best direction for the nation as a whole because States can learn from States and people will learn from people until the very best actions of government and free people are established in accordance to the particulars of State’s locations, economic attractiveness, standard of living, education availability and abilities, individual talents and economic condition.

    A real classical conservative Republican is in opposition to all federal actions that impose a “One Size Fits All” mandate on States and individuals except the One Size Fits All of human rights guaranteed by our Constitution.
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3,475
    Thanks
    738
    Thanked 957 Times in 726 Posts
    Groans
    254
    Groaned 585 Times in 550 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    A real classical conservative Republican first and foremost believes that America was not founded as a democracy, but rather to be a Representative Constitutional Republic whereby the people were to be governed by elected representation who’s service, loyalty and political endeavors were solely and strictly harnessed to the constitutional rule of law and not any whims and or prejudices of any majority of the population.

    "A real classical conservative Republican is anti-war who understands that most wars are simply racketeering scams except when attacked and then he/she is only willing to put the Republic into a war by a congressional declaration of war as mandated by the Constitution." Everyone in the WORLD has seen parties use Military action to openly change a targeted Countries perspective.

    The CIA's Coup d'état methods aren't exactly a secret anymore...........to some that is.......... We openly provided weapons to Libya rebels and Syrian rebels and almost all news sources in the world said it was through the Benghazi CIA gun running station. The Right uses limited information to drive up fear and hate on these topics knowing the smallest brains will fall in line.




    A real classical conservative Republican is a constitutional “liberal”, i. e. one who promotes and is loyal to the very liberal guarantees of “individual liberty” as mandated by the Constitution’s Bill Of Rights and amendments to the Constitution that promote and guarantee individual liberty.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a true libertarian, (small l) who promotes State’s Rights, Gay Rights, Religious Rights, Gun Rights, Human Rights, Minority Rights, Majority Rights, Collective Rights and Individual Rights. He/she does not waver from the support of All Rights for humans as long as no Right of others is violated.

    A real classical conservative Republican opposes the unconstitutional idiot failed authoritarian Drug War, unconstitutional federal corporate and social welfare and all actions taken by the federal government not authorized by the Constitution.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a State’s Rights activist who knows that our Constitution gives the powers to the States and the people respectively to do all things not enumerated and authorized by the Constitution for the federal government to do thereby creating a “several States Laboratory” of political actions, (not in violation of the national Constitution), that by their very definition and nature will decide the very best direction for the nation as a whole because States can learn from States and people will learn from people until the very best actions of government and free people are established in accordance to the particulars of State’s locations, economic attractiveness, standard of living, education availability and abilities, individual talents and economic condition.

    A real classical conservative Republican is in opposition to all federal actions that impose a “One Size Fits All” mandate on States and individuals except the One Size Fits All of human rights guaranteed by our Constitution.
    This will be fun........

    " America was not founded as a democracy" WEIRD! Who let that cat out of the bag? Why did it change?

    By paragraph 2 you are obvious you don't know your bias "A real classical conservative Republican is anti-war who understands that most wars are simply racketeering scams"

    America was based on "federalist" vs "anti-federalist" not what we have kiddo. The humor is that you repeat the Federalists posts without thought when you stand as an Anti_federalist.

    You should learn to stand strong on your thoughts, on your values, and on your strength.........The only problem with that is you will find yourself around people that call you a "goober" and think that their use of an insulting word made them win a debate............
    "Democrats will make you go broke on welfare but Republicans will make you go broke on warfare"~Papa

    "Once you submit to a political party you start justifying the terrible parts of that party to win"~Me

    "Anyone certain, is mistaken."~Best Political Quote Ever


    "People who don't understand the necessity for guns, don't follow the Constitution. People who don't understand the necessity to regulate gun ownership, do not follow the Constitution."~Me

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    A real classical conservative Republican first and foremost believes that America was not founded as a democracy, but rather to be a Representative Constitutional Republic whereby the people were to be governed by elected representation who’s service, loyalty and political endeavors were solely and strictly harnessed to the constitutional rule of law and not any whims and or prejudices of any majority of the population.

    A real classical conservative Republican is anti-war who understands that most wars are simply racketeering scams except when attacked and then he/she is only willing to put the Republic into a war by a congressional declaration of war as mandated by the Constitution.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a constitutional “liberal”, i. e. one who promotes and is loyal to the very liberal guarantees of “individual liberty” as mandated by the Constitution’s Bill Of Rights and amendments to the Constitution that promote and guarantee individual liberty.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a true libertarian, (small l) who promotes State’s Rights, Gay Rights, Religious Rights, Gun Rights, Human Rights, Minority Rights, Majority Rights, Collective Rights and Individual Rights. He/she does not waver from the support of All Rights for humans as long as no Right of others is violated.

    A real classical conservative Republican opposes the unconstitutional idiot failed authoritarian Drug War, unconstitutional federal corporate and social welfare and all actions taken by the federal government not authorized by the Constitution.

    A real classical conservative Republican is a State’s Rights activist who knows that our Constitution gives the powers to the States and the people respectively to do all things not enumerated and authorized by the Constitution for the federal government to do thereby creating a “several States Laboratory” of political actions, (not in violation of the national Constitution), that by their very definition and nature will decide the very best direction for the nation as a whole because States can learn from States and people will learn from people until the very best actions of government and free people are established in accordance to the particulars of State’s locations, economic attractiveness, standard of living, education availability and abilities, individual talents and economic condition.

    A real classical conservative Republican is in opposition to all federal actions that impose a “One Size Fits All” mandate on States and individuals except the One Size Fits All of human rights guaranteed by our Constitution.
    You lost me on the fourth and fifth paragraphs. I am not saying I am a fan of the drug war, but I am not for legalizing drugs.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    You lost me on the fourth and fifth paragraphs. I am not saying I am a fan of the drug war, but I am not for legalizing drugs.


    ( paragraph # 4)
    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    A real classical conservative Republican is a true libertarian, (small l) who promotes State’s Rights, Gay Rights, Religious Rights, Gun Rights, Human Rights, Minority Rights, Majority Rights, Collective Rights and Individual Rights. He/she does not waver from the support of All Rights for humans as long as no Right of others is violated.
    Then you oppose the promotion of ”ALL” human rights? Which human rights would you have government deny? Which humans would you have government deny rights to?


    (paragraph #5)
    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    A real classical conservative Republican opposes the unconstitutional idiot failed authoritarian Drug War, unconstitutional federal corporate and social welfare and all actions taken by the federal government not authorized by the Constitution.
    So you agree with and promote the Drug War even though Congress found it necessary to pass an amendment to our Constitution in 1919 to prohibit the sale and distribution of alcohol, yet Nixon and no Congress ever even thought about an amendment to prohibit the sale and distribution of some drugs?

    So you favor the huge, tax free profits that are being made by criminal types and terrorist from illegal drugs over a State regulated and taxed program similar to the sale and distribution of alcohol?

    Then you favor the illegal drug market’s corruption of police forces and politicians, the violence it causes in our streets, the clogging up of our judicial system and overloading of our prisons and the violence it creates along our borders and the thousands of otherwise non-violent citizens it locks away in prisons over a State taxed and regulated system like we have for alcohol? Why would you favor that?
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti-Party View Post
    This will be fun........

    " America was not founded as a democracy" WEIRD! Who let that cat out of the bag? Why did it change?
    “Change” from what to what Goober? Do you even have a fucking clue?

    By paragraph 2 you are obvious you don't know your bias "A real classical conservative Republican is anti-war who understands that most wars are simply racketeering scams"
    Do you live on generalized ignorant statements and shades of gray, or are you willing to actually make a rational statement for once and articulate just exactly what your problem is with “the statement?” I won’t hold my breath for that Goober!

    America was based on "federalist" vs "anti-federalist" not what we have kiddo. The humor is that you repeat the Federalists posts without thought when you stand as an Anti_federalist.
    Would you care to interpret that truckload of gibberish into rational thought, or just leave it hanging in the wind of ignorance and stupidity?

    You should learn to stand strong on your thoughts, on your values, and on your strength.........The only problem with that is you will find yourself around people that call you a "goober" and think that their use of an insulting word made them win a debate............
    You should take your meds and have them put the straight-jacket back on Goober before you get violent and hurt yourself with your keyboard.
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    ( paragraph # 4)


    Then you oppose the promotion of ”ALL” human rights? Which human rights would you have government deny? Which humans would you have government deny rights to?


    (paragraph #5)


    So you agree with and promote the Drug War even though Congress found it necessary to pass an amendment to our Constitution in 1919 to prohibit the sale and distribution of alcohol, yet Nixon and no Congress ever even thought about an amendment to prohibit the sale and distribution of some drugs?

    So you favor the huge, tax free profits that are being made by criminal types and terrorist from illegal drugs over a State regulated and taxed program similar to the sale and distribution of alcohol?

    Then you favor the illegal drug market’s corruption of police forces and politicians, the violence it causes in our streets, the clogging up of our judicial system and overloading of our prisons and the violence it creates along our borders and the thousands of otherwise non-violent citizens it locks away in prisons over a State taxed and regulated system like we have for alcohol? Why would you favor that?
    I don't believe in "human rights". That is a BS liberal meme. I believe in individual ljberties

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I don't believe in "human rights". That is a BS liberal meme. I believe in individual ljberties
    So then you don't believe in the inalienable rights of all humans guaranteed by your creator. Interesting!

    Apparently you have no problem with Nixon's unconstitutional violent, corrupt, insane failed fucking Drug War either since you fail to mention it again, right?
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    So then you don't believe in the inalienable rights of all humans guaranteed by your creator. Interesting!

    Apparently you have no problem with Nixon's unconstitutional violent, corrupt, insane failed fucking Drug War either since you fail to mention it again, right?
    You and I probably agree on more than we disagree so if you want to pick a fight than fine.

    I thought I made myself clear. I believe in individual liberty. I don't believe in "human rights" because it is too opaque and used by leftists to broaden the scope of government. I don't know how I can make myself any more clear

    As for the drug war, this is a topic in which I struggle. I agree there is little the government can do to stop people from wanting to distort their reality, however I also believe it is naive to think just making drugs legal would solve all of our problems.

    As for Nixon? I think he was a left wing loon whose only transgression against the left was going after the Rosenbergs.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    You and I probably agree on more than we disagree so if you want to pick a fight than fine.
    If arguing points of disagreement is “picking a fight,” I think that’s what everybody comes here for isn’t it?

    I thought I made myself clear. I believe in individual liberty.
    ”individual” to who or what? Individual to just particular groups? Individual rights for rich folks or white folks, or politicians, or union members or non-union members, or black folks, or brown folks, or yellow or red folks? Or how about HUMAN folks? If we’re without prejudices and biases relative to the human race how do we not “believe in” HUMAN RIGHTS?” To say we don’t believe in human rights, is to say we don’t believe in rights for all humans.

    I don't believe in "human rights" because it is too opaque and used by leftists to broaden the scope of government. I don't know how I can make myself any more clear.
    You should be able to easily make yourself more clear by presenting evidence and or examples of that accusation. How has the left used human rights to broaden the scope of government? I’ll be interested to receive that knowledge.

    As for the drug war, this is a topic in which I struggle. I agree there is little the government can do to stop people from wanting to distort their reality, however I also believe it is naive to think just making drugs legal would solve all of our problems.
    Actually once upon a time all drugs were legal in America. There’s no historical evidence that America at that point in history was awash in addicts wallowing in the gutters and back alleys. Once upon a time the class (“A”) narcotic alcohol was illegal in America and all historical evidence shows an explosion of illegal speakeasies, criminals involved in a huge profit tax free illegal alcohol running marketplace, alcohol corrupted police and politicians, violence in our streets and on our borders, thousands of otherwise non-violent citizens in jail, the jails and judicial system in general clogged in an alcohol related quagmire. Now States regulate the sale and use of alcohol.

    If drugs were decriminalized would there be more drug addicts? Maybe but there’s no evidence that decriminalizing alcohol created more drunks and alcoholics per-capita.

    “Solving all of our problems?” That’s fantasy that only leftist and rightist believe in. Their answer for that is GOVERNMENT.

    We never solve all of our problems or any of them completely. We simply make choices that either make our problems fewer or easier to contend with, or we make laws that make our problems worse. Walla! The Drug War.
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    They died in caves, thousands of years since, as a result of Cromagnon competition.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iolo View Post
    Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    They died in caves, thousands of years since, as a result of Cromagnon competition.
    Though on the threshold of extinction, they’re not all dead yet! They’re called constitutionalist and or libertarians.
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default Who Are The Real Classical Conservative Republicans?

    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    If arguing points of disagreement is “picking a fight,” I think that’s what everybody comes here for isn’t it?



    ”individual” to who or what? Individual to just particular groups? Individual rights for rich folks or white folks, or politicians, or union members or non-union members, or black folks, or brown folks, or yellow or red folks? Or how about HUMAN folks? If we’re without prejudices and biases relative to the human race how do we not “believe in” HUMAN RIGHTS?” To say we don’t believe in human rights, is to say we don’t believe in rights for all humans.



    You should be able to easily make yourself more clear by presenting evidence and or examples of that accusation. How has the left used human rights to broaden the scope of government? I’ll be interested to receive that knowledge.



    Actually once upon a time all drugs were legal in America. There’s no historical evidence that America at that point in history was awash in addicts wallowing in the gutters and back alleys. Once upon a time the class (“A”) narcotic alcohol was illegal in America and all historical evidence shows an explosion of illegal speakeasies, criminals involved in a huge profit tax free illegal alcohol running marketplace, alcohol corrupted police and politicians, violence in our streets and on our borders, thousands of otherwise non-violent citizens in jail, the jails and judicial system in general clogged in an alcohol related quagmire. Now States regulate the sale and use of alcohol.

    If drugs were decriminalized would there be more drug addicts? Maybe but there’s no evidence that decriminalizing alcohol created more drunks and alcoholics per-capita.

    “Solving all of our problems?” That’s fantasy that only leftist and rightist believe in. Their answer for that is GOVERNMENT.

    We never solve all of our problems or any of them completely. We simply make choices that either make our problems fewer or easier to contend with, or we make laws that make our problems worse. Walla! The Drug War.
    Have you ever heard the statement "brevity is the soul of wit"? Think about it.

    People come here for many reasons. I guess if I don't share yours I am not a conservative?

    You were the one speaking of groups of people. I don't. I believe in the individual. Yes I don't share your left wing view if human rights. But that is ok.

    I also said I have mixed feelings about legalizing drugs.

    If you think your haranguing is going to change my mind, you are sorely mistaken.

    Maybe you need more fiber in your diet?

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-23-2014)

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    People come here for many reasons. I guess if I don't share yours I am not a conservative?
    The only reasons I can see folks coming here would be to argue politics or to be amused by other folks arguing politics. I’ve noticed that you aren’t timid about the former. If I’m missing something I’m open to enlightenment.

    You were the one speaking of groups of people. I don't. I believe in the individual. Yes I don't share your left wing view if human rights. But that is ok.
    So then in your world political parties aren’t ”groups” of folks made up of individuals, they’re simply “individuals?” Government isn’t a “group” of people? Unions, charities, special interest, Wall Street, blacks, whites, Asians and Native Americans and Hispanics aren’t groups of folks made up of individuals? You’ve developed a talent to eradicate all collective human actions and realities from your vocabulary? I reckon that’s one way to reduce the redundancy and measurements of your dictionary and encyclopedia, I prefer a larger reference availability myself.

    Might inquire what exactly is “leftwing” about my recognition of human rights?

    I also said I have mixed feelings about legalizing drugs.
    What’s to mix?

    If you think your haranguing is going to change my mind, you are sorely mistaken.
    So conversation and questioning is “forceful haranguing?”

    I thought it might simply be rational peaceful exchange of ideological thought that might provide food for thought for both of us while I believe that the only people that can change a mind are the people owning the particular mind at issue.

    Maybe you need more fiber in your diet?
    Maybe you need a lot more explanation in your typing. You seem to be at a loss for same.

    If I were “full of shit,” I’d be a Democrat or a Republican, I’m neither!
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Classic Liberal View Post
    The only reasons I can see folks coming here would be to argue politics or to be amused by other folks arguing politics. I’ve noticed that you aren’t timid about the former. If I’m missing something I’m open to enlightenment.

    Well, if those are the only reasons you see, that must be it right? But, for the record, I am more amused by others arguing politics than actually arguing them myself. Sure, I will jump in there and mix it up on occasion. But, I enjoy watching you rubes play Big Indian/Little Indian.



    So then in your world political parties aren’t ”groups” of folks made up of individuals, they’re simply “individuals?” Government isn’t a “group” of people? Unions, charities, special interest, Wall Street, blacks, whites, Asians and Native Americans and Hispanics aren’t groups of folks made up of individuals? You’ve developed a talent to eradicate all collective human actions and realities from your vocabulary? I reckon that’s one way to reduce the redundancy and measurements of your dictionary and encyclopedia, I prefer a larger reference availability myself.

    Might inquire what exactly is “leftwing” about my recognition of human rights?

    Here is a nice link for you to peruse from our friends at the United Nations on what they think are "human rights". One of them includes a right to employment. Do you think people have a right to employment? Another is a right to leisure time. Do you think people have a right to leisure time? I do not. As I have said, the term "human rights" is too subjective. I am more interested in individual rights of person and property. But, hey, you are free to believe what you want even if it is a left wing belief.

    http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/


    What’s to mix?

    I think I have already said that my libertarian streak leans to just let people fuck themselves up and who should care, but life isn't that simple, people on drugs happen to fuck other peoples lives as well. So, I go back and forth on the issue. I am deeply sorry that it isn't good enough for you. To be honest, the drug issue isn't really high on my priority. But, it does seem to cause you great concern. Maybe, if I ever get this desire to please you, I might move it up on my priority list? I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

    So conversation and questioning is “forceful haranguing?”

    Yes, that is what you are doing. You are free to do it. Just don't expect to change my mind.

    I thought it might simply be rational peaceful exchange of ideological thought that might provide food for thought for both of us while I believe that the only people that can change a mind are the people owning the particular mind at issue.



    Maybe you need a lot more explanation in your typing. You seem to be at a loss for same.

    If I were “full of shit,” I’d be a Democrat or a Republican, I’m neither!

    Yeah, you are one of those "moderates" I hear so much about
    Don't know how many more ways I can answer your questions. Maybe you are a bit like Desh?

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-23-2014)

  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Here is a nice link for you to peruse from our friends at the United Nations on what they think are "human rights". One of them includes a right to employment. Do you think people have a right to employment? Another is a right to leisure time. Do you think people have a right to leisure time? I do not. As I have said, the term "human rights" is too subjective. I am more interested in individual rights of person and property. But, hey, you are free to believe what you want even if it is a left wing belief.

    http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
    Well I’ll just say that I don’t give a flying fuck what the United Nations says is Human Rights or anything else that comes from the International Den of Fucking Drunks and Socialist Morons. I’m sure that the commie left would also argue that “individual” rights include the right to employment and the right to leisure. That only proves that the commie left doesn’t know the difference between a “right” and a “privilege.” Human Rights in my world are ”life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and whatever private property one can peacefully acquire.

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I think I have already said that my libertarian streak leans to just let people fuck themselves up and who should care, but life isn't that simple, people on drugs happen to fuck other peoples lives as well. So, I go back and forth on the issue.
    The Drug War doesn’t prevent other people fucking up other people’s lives, it causes more people’s lives to be fucked up. You seem to be missing that point.

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I am deeply sorry that it isn't good enough for you. To be honest, the drug issue isn't really high on my priority. But, it does seem to cause you great concern. Maybe, if I ever get this desire to please you, I might move it up on my priority list? I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.
    If I came here to be pleasured by other folks, I wouldn’t strive to be the “equal opportunity pisser offer” that I aspire to be when it comes to politics.

    “Every” Constitutional violation perpetrated by government concerns me. I’m not at all sorry that seems to bother you!

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Yes, that is what you are doing. You are free to do it. Just don't expect to change my mind.
    I repeat, in my opinion the only person that can change a mind is the person owning the mind at issue.

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Yeah, you are one of those "moderates" I hear so much about.
    Looks as though you’re one of those people that confuses classical liberalism and constitutionalism with “moderation.” At least you’re in the “middle” with that accusation. The modern liberal, neo-commie left call me a radical knuckle dragging rightwing bastard and the neo-conservative RINOs call me a fucking leftwing idiot. The truth be known, I’m simply a Constitutionalist Classical Liberal, i. e. Bill Of Rights loyalist liberal, Limited Government Classical Conservative i. e. libertarian, (small l.)

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Don't know how many more ways I can answer your questions. Maybe you are a bit like Desh?
    Now I understand your assertion about “picking a fight.” Maybe I’ll start referring to you as that idiot Truth Detector’s little brother, how about that?
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

Similar Threads

  1. Where The Hell Are The Real Republicans?
    By Robo in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-18-2014, 06:36 PM
  2. Drunkenness proves you're a real conservative
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-18-2012, 02:26 PM
  3. Using tobacco proves you're a real conservative
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 03-18-2012, 08:33 AM
  4. Eating lots of steak proves you';re a real conservative
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-13-2012, 06:47 PM
  5. Conservative Republicans trying to control your life EVEN MORE!
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-12-2009, 07:49 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •