Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: AGW Falsified: NOAA Data Incompatible with the Theory of Anthropopenic Global Warming

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default AGW Falsified: NOAA Data Incompatible with the Theory of Anthropopenic Global Warming

    ANTHROPOGENIC Global Warming (AGW) theory claims the earth is warming because rising CO2 is like a blanket, reducing Earth’s energy loss to space. However, data from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that at least for the last 30 years, Earth’s energy loss to space has been rising. The last 30 years of NOAA data is not compatible with the theory of AGW. It would appear that either 30 years of NOAA data is wrong or the theory of AGW is flawed. This is Michael Hammer’s conclusion following analysis of the official outgoing long wave radiation (OLR) data.

    Read the complete article here: ‘The NOAA Outgoing Long Wave Radiation Data Appears to be Incompatible with The Theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming’ by Michael Hammer.

    The research uncovers some interesting trends and most importantly highlights that:
    .
    1. Earth can only warm if the rate of energy input exceeds the rate of energy loss;

    2. Thus earth would warm if energy absorbed from the sun increased or energy loss to space (outgoing longwave radiation or OLR for short) decreased – or of course both;

    3. The theory of AGW claims that Earth is warming because rising CO2 is reducing the energy loss to space i.e. is causing OLR to decrease;

    4. Thirty years of experimental data published by NOAA (one of the prime AGW reference sites) shows OLR has been rising progressively between 1980 and 2010 and is now 2.5 watt/sqM higher than in 1980; and

    5. The period between 1980 and 2010 is when almost all the CO2 induced warming is supposed to have taken place.

    “If the corner stone of AGW theory says earth is warming because outgoing long wave radiation is decreasing yet 30 years of experimental data shows OLR is rising (remember 30 years is the time AGW proponents claim is the interval necessary to separate climate from weather) it would seem the theory of AGW is as a minimum extremely seriously compromised.”

    Read the complete article here: http://jennifermarohasy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/AGW_Falsified_Michael_Hammer.pdf

    http://jennifermarohasy.com/2013/12/...bal-warming-2/


    ****

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    NOVA (02-13-2014)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    You're a liar who doesn't care about the truth, a vicious troll, you want people to suffer, for us to all fail. Well, hopefully you and your ilk all die soon, and we can get to actual action on this destroyed world your generation has left us with, you piece of human garbage.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyrion the Imp View Post
    You're a liar who doesn't care about the truth, a vicious troll, you want people to suffer, for us to all fail. Well, hopefully you and your ilk all die soon, and we can get to actual action on this destroyed world your generation has left us with, you piece of human garbage.
    Still haven't found a job? I see that Dantes has some serious competition keep it up.

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyrion the Imp View Post
    You're a liar who doesn't care about the truth, a vicious troll, you want people to suffer, for us to all fail. Well, hopefully you and your ilk all die soon, and we can get to actual action on this destroyed world your generation has left us with, you piece of human garbage.
    So what is the truth then? Are you saying that the NOAA OLR data is incorrect?

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    The cornerstone of modern science is the testability of theories. This means that a theory must make predictions about the way the physical universe behaves, so that it may be tested by investigators other than the theory's originators. When a prediction made by a theory is confirmed it helps to strengthen the theory’s claim to correctness. When a prediction made by a theory is shown not to be true it weakens the theory, possibly invalidating the theory all together.

    Time and time again you will get some clown that says you have to be a climatologist to be able to understand what is going on, that is 100% pure bullshit. If the theory doesn't fit the facts then it is a flawed theory and people cling to it for reasons other than science to the extent that it becomes quasi-religious in nature. Each group has its reasons, politicians because it justifies green taxes and subsidies for renewables, the left wing because to do so is sticking it to the man and fighting "capitalism" and most cynical of all, organisations like Goldman Sachs that stand to make squiilions from carbon trading.
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 02-13-2014 at 11:15 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 01:27 PM
  2. Global Warming Data
    By Mott the Hoople in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-29-2010, 09:54 AM
  3. Dano's Theory on Global Warming proves correct
    By KingCondanomation in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-23-2009, 08:11 AM
  4. Ooops... Global Warming Data...
    By Damocles in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 11-17-2008, 08:37 PM
  5. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-01-2008, 09:28 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •