Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act

[Truth Detector]

I don't think that Bush was willfully negligent about that information... I just think his priorities were not arab extremists, but Star Wars missile defense. I think he thought that arab terrorism was sort of "last century" stuff. Hey... after 9/11 he got the wake up call, as we all did.

Wow; so suddenly when challenged to produce facts to support your dishonest asinine assertions the story changes.

Thank you for once again proving what a dishonest partisan asshole you are.

But again; you're assumptions are wrong, false and cannot be supported by any facts. Yes asshole; you really are THAT stupid, THAT repugnant and THAT partisan. You don't care about the truth or the facts as long as you can promote the historically failed ideological agenda you emotionally cling to.

Dunce.

[Truth Detector]

If you know about Kenneth Williams, you know what his memo entailed. If you don't, you don't.

Dear dishonest asshole; I'm challenging you to post it here and to highlight the content that contained "actionable intel".

[maineman]

All I said was that the Phoenix memo alerted the FBI to the fact that arabs were learning to fly jets and not wanting to learn how to land them. You said that was not the case.

[Truth Detector]

All I said was that the Phoenix memo alerted the FBI to the fact that arabs were learning to fly jets and not wanting to learn how to land them. You said that was not the case.

No you did not you dishonest asshole; you were suggesting that Bush ignored intel and I challenged you to produce the actionable intel Bush could have acted on. And like the dishonest partisan asshole that you are, you continue deflecting, obfuscating and constructing strawman claims.

Produce the intel shit-for-brains. And then explain what Bush stood to gain by ignoring it. Or, you can admit that you really are a dishonest hyper partisan asshole I know you to be who is not interested in facts, the truth or honesty.

[USFREEDOM911]

No you did not you dishonest asshole; you were suggesting that Bush ignored intel and I challenged you to produce the actionable intel Bush could have acted on. And like the dishonest partisan asshole that you are, you continue deflecting, obfuscating and constructing strawman claims.

Produce the intel shit-for-brains. And then explain what Bush stood to gain by ignoring it. Or, you can admit that you really are a dishonest hyper partisan asshole I know you to be who is not interested in facts, the truth or honesty.

C'mon now.
Aren't you aware that it's against the law for anyone to learn how to fly a plane, after takeoff, and not want to learn how to land it.
Clinton signed it into law.

[Anti-Party]

C'mon now.
Aren't you aware that it's against the law for anyone to learn how to fly a plane, after takeoff, and not want to learn how to land it.
Clinton signed it into law.

Yea, it's GOVERNMENT. It's not the money driving subjects to everything they might want them to do. That has never happened in history LOL

Small brain morons.

[Rune]

LMAO

Really showing your mental acuity.

[Rune]

Cark definately was full of shit thinking that anything prior to 9-11 was "actionable" intelligence.

The truth is, before 9-11, no one imagined that terrorists would fly airliners into high rise buildings OR, that the results would be a complete building collapse.

But equall retarded and off the charts is the assumption that Bush had anything to gain by "allowing" the 9-11 attacks to occur.

Why is dimwitted stuff like this in "current events?"

Assuming he didn't "allow" the attacks. did he gain anything?

[Rune]

Dear shit-for-brains; I don't need to have served to comprehend what actionable intel is.

It is you who doesn't know shit while you engage in your dishonest partisan bullshit. I'm merely here to call you out on your dishonest bullshit and rubbing your nose in the excrement you spam thus forum with asshole.

So with all your dishonest bullshit, please provide me with the ACTIONABLE intel Bush had. Then you can attempt to explain in your own dishonest repugnant excrement filled way what Bush had to gain by ignoring such intel.

But alas, you cannot because you KNOW that the bulsshit that erupts from your keyboard is nothing more than lies.

You really are THAT fucking dumb and THAT fucking dishonest.

Any questions Commander dunce?

Pretty sure that MM is simply pointing out that you are unqualified to judge whether the intell was actionable or not; especially since you never saw the vast majority of it.

[Rune]

I don't need to do any research; i never ask questions i dint already know the answer to.

There you have it folks, the recipe for ignorance itself.

Does explain a LOT truth defective.

This is easily the most ignorant statement of the year. You make Nova look normal.

[Truth Detector]

Really showing your mental acuity.

Really showing your effeminate vagina man whine again eh?

Moron.

[Truth Detector]

Assuming he didn't "allow" the attacks. did he gain anything?

Another poorly constructed sentence lacking in basic syntax; color me shocked.

How would Bush have not allowed the attacks to occur; do elaborate?

[Truth Detector]

There you have it folks, the recipe for ignorance itself.

Does explain a LOT truth defective.

This is easily the most ignorant statement of the year. You make Nova look normal.

There you have it folks; another pointless dimwitted post intended purely to flame and spam.

Yay you eh shit-for-brains?

Carry on dunce.

[Truth Detector]

I am still waiting for the dullard brigade to explain how Bush allowed the attacks to occur and what "actionable" intel he had to act on.

But alas, they are adept at deflecting, lying, whining and running away.

[NOVA]

FBI agents in the southwest WERE aware, in the summer of 2001, that arabs were learning to fly jets, but did not care to learn how to land them. They reported that to their higher ups, but somehow... Team Bush didn't think that was cause for alarm.

WASHINGTON, Sept. 18 -- The United States intelligence community was told in 1998 that Arab terrorists were planning to fly a bomb-laden plane into the World Trade Center, but the F.B.I. and the Federal Aviation Administration did not take the threat seriously, a Congressional investigation into the Sept. 11 attacks has found.
That August 1998 intelligence report from the Central Intelligence Agency was just one of several warnings the United States received, but did not seriously analyze, in the years leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks that were detailed today at a Congressional hearing. The existence of the 1998 intelligence report was disclosed in a presentation by the committee's staff director, Eleanor Hill. The report concluded that there was evidence of a growing interest by Al Qaeda and related groups in high-profile attacks inside the United States years before the attacks on the trade center and the Pentagon. The Congressional report was the first disclosure that there was specific intelligence about terrorist plans to crash airplanes into the trade center, though officials said that those plans did not appear to be connected to the Sept. 11 attack.

The threat level grew so high that by December 1998, the director of central intelligence, George J. Tenet, issued a ''declaration of war'' on Al Qaeda, in a memorandum circulated in the intelligence community.

Yet the terrorists strolled into the US right under team Clinton's noses ...before Bush took office....whats your point ?

So the Clinton team knew about the terrorists in 1998....for 2 whole years....and it seems did nothing.