Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act

[katsung47]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff


Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.


Startling disclosures?



For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.

Bush cited as conspirator

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12...nds-obama-act/

[Ishmael Pequod]

Oh my god. I knew it. When are they going to arrest that nasty son of a bitch.......

[NOVA]

Desh must love this stuff.....

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Katsung, I have decided to declare you a Hero of the Revolution.

[StormX]

Don't we have a conspiracy/whacko forum for these type of posts?

[Anti-Party]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff


Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.


Startling disclosures?



For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.

Bush cited as conspirator

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12...nds-obama-act/

Keep voting for Citizens United. As long as a Corporation can profit, a Corporation will invest....this is basic small brain stuff.

[/MSG/]

Katsung, I have decided to declare you a Hero of the Revolution.

4 morons and Watermark: A Thread, by JPP.

[Anti-Party]

Just because Bush had the war plans for Afghanistan on his desk the day before 9/11 doesn't mean he manufactured 9/11. Bush was on vacation mostly because the Corporations were doing the work for him.

Watch the Documentary "Loose Change". Sadly, a majority of it lines up. But it isn't for Government Domination. It for Big Corporations to rebuild the twin towers like we are TODAY for some reason still rebuilding Iraq with tax payer money.

The Right Cries "Liberal Government" when they notice this abuse but don't realize they are part of the abuse when they support the Big Corp over Humanity.

[Anti-Party]

Don't we have a conspiracy/whacko forum for these type of posts?

Guessing you haven't seen "Loose Change". I KNOW you don't know anything about Foreign Policy so that fits.

[Taft2016]

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11

That's news? We've known that all along.

and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.

Truther rants. Nothing new to see here either.

[StormX]

Guessing you haven't seen "Loose Change". I KNOW you don't know anything about Foreign Policy so that fits.

Sorry not into fantasy movies.....

[katsung47]

Saudi Royal criticizes US policy of inaction in Syria
Published December 17th, 2013

Saudi won't follow US as it used to be. That's why they released this news to intimidate. If you dare to criticize, we'll charge you for "committing 911 attack".

It is not an attempt to reveal the 911 truth. It is just another dirty political trick of intimidation. And they play you fools, poor steeples.

[Rune]

Saudi won't follow US as it used to be. That's why they released this news to intimidate. If you dare to criticize, we'll charge you for "committing 911 attack".

It is not an attempt to reveal the 911 truth. It is just another dirty political trick of intimidation. And they play you fools, poor steeples.

That's sheeples not steeples.

[NOVA]

You mean Clarke was full of shit when he urged Bush White House officials months before Sept. 11 to meet to discuss what he saw as a severe threat from al Qaeda.?

Six years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the CIA warned in a classified report that Islamic extremists likely would strike on U.S. soil at landmarks in Washington or New York, or through the airline industry, according to intelligence officials.
And yet the terrorists strolled right in under Clinton,s nose...result, almost 3000 dead in NY.
Guess the first attack on the WTC didn't wake him up or distract him from his blow jobs either....

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-warn...-attack-in-95/

[Truth Detector]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff


Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.


Startling disclosures?



For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.

Bush cited as conspirator

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12...nds-obama-act/

LMAO: so do you get paid to be this stupid?