Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Issues of Liability for Libel, Slander and Publication of Private Facts and the Net.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces New Mexico
    Posts
    10,656
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 1,630 Times in 874 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 39 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Issues of Liability for Libel, Slander and Publication of Private Facts and the Net.

    FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.

    slander

    n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements, such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease or being unable to perform one's occupation, are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much as if not more than printed publications.

    libel

    1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander, which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. Publication need only be to one person, but it must be a statement which claims to be fact and is not clearly identified as an opinion. While it is sometimes said that the person making the libelous statement must have been intentional and malicious, actually it need only be obvious that the statement would do harm and is untrue. Proof of malice, however, does allow a party defamed to sue for general damages for damage to reputation, while an inadvertent libel limits the damages to actual harm (such as loss of business) called special damages.

    Publication of Private Facts

    In most states, you can be sued for publishing private facts about another person, even if those facts are true. The term "private facts" refers to information about someone's personal life that has not previously been revealed to the public, that is not of legitimate public concern, and the publication of which would be offensive to a reasonable person. For example, writing about a person's HIV status, sexual orientation, or financial troubles could lead to liability for publication of private facts.

    All of these things are legally actionable. The first two I am sure most of you are familiar with, but many people do not know that the publication of a private fact in a public forum is also legally actionable and unlike the other two truth is not a defense. If you make a statement that falls into one of these categories on a website YOU, the person who generated the CONTENT can be sued in a court of law. What court is up to legal arguments which bring about more legal fees. With internet cases, some courts have relied on long established definitions of personal jurisdiction requiring that the person committing the act have purposefully availed himself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state. Others have said that in making statements directed at a person makes you subject to that jurisdiction. So, If someone in Maine libels someone in Southern California they MIGHT find themselves having to travel to California for hearings and trials, if California finds they have personal jurisdiction.

    WEBSITE LIABILITY FOR THIRD PARTY GENERATED CONDUCT

    The Communications Decency Act provides protection against liability for torts (including libel, slander and other forms of defamation) for website operators for third-party content posted on their site. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act provides protection against copyright infringement claims for the user-generated content, if the site owner observes certain "safe harbor" provisions set out by the law. The Communications Decency Act has been very broadly applied to protect the operator of a website from liability for the content of the postings of third parties. Only recently have courts begun to chip away at those protections, finding liability in cases where it appeared that the website operator in effect asked for the offending content – as in a case where the owner of a roommate-finder site gave users a questionnaire that specifically prompted them to indicate a racial preference for a roommate – something which offends the Fair Housing Act. Absent such a specific prompt for offending information, the protections afforded by this statute still appear quite broad. (Thanks to http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/ for a succinct explanation of this area of the law).

    So what does this all mean? It means that if you are a nasty mean individual who wants to post falsehoods about people or even post the truth when there was no public interest in what you posted, you can get your ass sued. Posting about someone's financial hardships or specific health problems are most often found to be violations per se and all that happens after that is getting out the adding machine and determining a fgure.

    It also means that if someone offends you on a website, you cannot, with some very narrowly tailored exceptions, sue the owner of the website for bullshit (the preceding was a legal term of art) someone else generated.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Socrtease For This Post:

    Canceled.2014.2 (01-06-2014), christiefan915 (12-13-2013), Minister of Truth (12-12-2013)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Detroit, AKA HEAVEN
    Posts
    31,403
    Thanks
    11,769
    Thanked 10,865 Times in 7,323 Posts
    Groans
    642
    Groaned 785 Times in 732 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Sticky for posterity.
    WATERMARK, GREATEST OF THE TRINITY, ON CHIK-FIL-A
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigmund Freud View Post
    The fields of mediocre chicken sandwiches shall be sowed with salt, so that nothing may ever grow there again.
    www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com

    www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com

  4. The Following User Groans At /MSG/ For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-15-2013)

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to /MSG/ For This Post:

    Canceled.2014.2 (01-06-2014)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    85,117
    Thanks
    2,505
    Thanked 16,531 Times in 10,535 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 578 Times in 535 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Basically, be careful what you say... I have warned you that you are responsible for your posts. I have even taken some action to warn and to change the activity of some people who may be running foul of this. You can be sued for what you say here.
    Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
    - -- Aristotle

    Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
    - -- The Buddha

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    - -- Aristotle

  7. The Following User Groans At Damocles For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-15-2013)

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Damocles For This Post:

    Canceled.2014.2 (01-06-2014), christiefan915 (12-13-2013), Jarod (12-13-2013), Minister of Truth (12-12-2013), The Dude (12-13-2013)

  9. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    It also means that if someone offends you on a website, you cannot, with some very narrowly tailored exceptions, sue the owner of the website for bullshit (the preceding was a legal term of art) someone else generated.
    most important part

    JPP has counsel.
    Last edited by BRUTALITOPS; 12-13-2013 at 04:27 PM.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  10. The Following User Groans At BRUTALITOPS For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-15-2013)

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    /MSG/ (12-13-2013)

Similar Threads

  1. Dishonesty, Slander, and Idiocy
    By meme in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-08-2009, 01:01 PM
  2. Court OKs broad Web libel immunity
    By LadyT in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-21-2006, 12:26 PM
  3. NewsMax is a sick publication
    By klaatu in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-01-2006, 10:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •