Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The LATEST Benghazi hoax? It's all just another manufactured scandal after all.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default The LATEST Benghazi hoax? It's all just another manufactured scandal after all.

    WOW...

    What a surprise...



    Report: Benghazi witness was nowhere near diplomatic compound during terrorist attack:



    A security subcontractor who gave his account to CBS “60 Minutes” of the events leading up to the fatal attack at Benghazi had previously told his employers he was nowhere near the diplomatic compound at the time, according to a Washington Post report.

    The Oct. 27 television report was based on a yearlong investigation by reporter Lara Logan and producer Max McCellan and featured an interview with a man identified by the pseudonym “Morgan Jones,” who was described as “a security officer who witnessed the attack.”

    A Fox News correspondent said the following day that the network had been working on a story with the same security officer, but those efforts ended when he asked for money in exchange for his participation.

    Threshold Editions, which specializes in “conservative non-fiction,” published a book Tuesday by the same source, called The Embassy House: The Explosive Eyewitness Account of the Libyan Embassy Siege by the Soldier Who Was There.

    The Washington Post report, published Thursday, said the book largely backs up the account provided to “60 Minutes,” but the newspaper says the source provided a written account to his employers three days after the attack that he’d spent the night of the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack at his own beachside villa in Benghazi.

    “We could not get anywhere near (the diplomatic compound) as roadblocks had been set up,” said the security contractor, whose real name was confirmed as Dylan Davies by officials who’d worked with him in Libya.

    The newspaper reported that Davies provided a 2 ½-page incident report to his employer, Blue Mountain, the British contractor hired by the State Department to guard the compound’s perimeter.

    Davies said he learned U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens had been killed in the raid showed him a cell phone photo of the diplomat’s charred remains, and the security officer visited the still-smoking compound the following day to photograph what was left.

    The “60 Minutes” report claimed the security officer had scaled a 12-foot wall while it was still overrun with Al Qaeda forces, and Davies said on the program that he’d personally struck one of the terrorists in the face with the butt of his rifle.

    He also told “60 Minutes” that he’d gone to the hospital and seen Stevens’ body.
    Davies told CBS that he and a Foreign Service officer had been worried about security at the compound.

    The security officer’s co-author told The Washington Post that Davies may have been dishonest in his incident report because his employer had asked him to stay away from the compound after he was told of the attack by telephone.

    A CBS spokesman told the newspaper that the network stands firmly behind its story as it aired Sunday.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) used the “60 Minutes” report to justify calling Monday for additional hearings into Benghazi and threatened to block Senate appointments until lawmakers had heard from all the surviving witnesses to the attack.

    However, Graham conceded Wednesday that witnesses have already been questioned by members of Congress, but their testimony hasn’t been publicly released because the investigations are still ongoing.

    David Brock, chairman of Media Matters, has called on CBS to retract its Benghazi report based on the security officer’s comments.


    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/0...rorist-attack/
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ZappasGuitar For This Post:

    christiefan915 (11-01-2013)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    They will keep this drumbeat going, like they did the Whitewater Investigation, until they can use it to set her up for something, or until she has served her two terms.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    christiefan915 (11-01-2013)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Suddenly no one wants to discuss Benghazi?

    Why?
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,532
    Thanks
    65,153
    Thanked 38,086 Times in 25,662 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    "Morgan Jones" lied?

    I'm shocked, shocked...


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Suddenly no one wants to discuss Benghazi?

    Why?
    Oh I'm more then willing to discuss it - like the CIA annex being used to smuggle Libyan weapons into Syria?

    but we're going to run into another "stonewall", a la' Nixonian modus operandi -this from the "transparent" Obama Adm.

    A source told CNN that as many as 35 CIA operatives were in Benghazi at the time of the September 11, 2012 attack which killed US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, foreign service information management officer Sean Smith and security personnel Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, both former Navy SEALs. The source told CNN that as many as seven Americans were wounded during the attack and that as many as 21 Americans were working in the building known as 'the annex,' which is believed to be run by the CIA.
    There has been much speculation that US operatives were covertly running surface-to-air missiles from Libya through Turkey and into the hands of Syrian rebels fighting to overthrow the Bashar al-Assad regime in a bloody civil war that has claimed more than 100,000 lives since 2011.
    Of the two US agencies known to be working in Benghazi, the State Department and the CIA, the former says it was only assisting the new Libyan government in the destruction of weapons that were damaged, outdated or unsafe, and that it was not involved in the international transfer of any arms. State Department officials told CNN that they "can't speak for any other agencies

    Read more: http://digitaljournal.com/article/355726#ixzz2jRN0HrZ6
    How about Hillary Clinton's/Suan Rice "Viagra rape Story" .....If only BAC were still here, we'd flesh it out for you.

    Just think of it this way - when we deposed Qaddafi ( I mean the U.S. LED the effort), we facilitated/created a 'terrorist state.'

    Remember abu- Anas living openly in Tripoli?? how does that happen?


    Thanks for posting the OP, this is new to me anyways..
    However, Graham conceded Wednesday that witnesses have already been questioned by members of Congress, but their testimony hasn’t been publicly released because the investigations are still ongoing
    Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”
    ________

    Cold War 2.0 Russia hysteria is turning people’s brains into guacamole.
    We’ve got to find a way to snap out of the propaganda trance
    ________

    Buddha: "trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it "
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7. All Good Children Go to Heaven

Similar Threads

  1. The Latest Benghazi Hoax
    By christiefan915 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 10-31-2013, 06:58 PM
  2. Help me think of a name for the latest Obama scandal
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-09-2013, 08:53 AM
  3. IRS scandal & Benghazi... how many other cover ups are out there?
    By Cancel 2016.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 261
    Last Post: 05-21-2013, 05:57 PM
  4. synthetic datasets with manufactured biases
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-17-2013, 11:32 AM
  5. Republican Senators Skip Benghazi Benghazi Breifing
    By Bonestorm in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-15-2012, 03:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •