the most concerned people live in the south.
The very ones who deny global warming is even taking place
the most concerned people live in the south.
The very ones who deny global warming is even taking place
guess what is causing this frequency of extreme weather?
Well, they better get used to it.
If we stopped emissions today, it wouldn't make a difference for centuries.
they wanted it.
that is why they have lied about it for decades
Its like they are helping Jesus make the rapture come
Maybe that is why they like Grover so much?
they want to destroy this country so jesus will come and take them home.
Desh is a religious CAGW'er (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming believer)
IPCC AR5 is out in the next couple of days. The IPCC have walked back the alarmism, but you won't see the CAGW'ers doing likewise.
Desh is a low information CAGW'er and will repeat the alarmism to her grave even if we enter into a Maunder Minimum type cooling trend over the next two decades.
Desh fails to understand or chooses to ignore the fact that the IPCC overstated climate sensitivity in the AR4 and the models all using the bogus assumption are expensive examples of GIGO. As evidence I will direct readers to google "climate sensitivity CO2" and use the search tools to filter only links from the past year and you will find the latest estimates of a doubling of CO2 concentration are yielding 2.5 degree Celsius change( lower than the previously low end of model predictions)
This guy put together a really good video. Hot off the press. Found via youtube search with terms "IPCC AR5" and filter set to today
your an idiot
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/20...-choices/?_r=2
To my eye, perhaps the most important line in the summary of the new report on global warming science from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is this:
By the mid-21st century the magnitudes of the projected changes are substantially affected by the choice of emissions scenario.
For decades to come, we’re locked into generally rising temperatures, with shorter-term temperature shifts* — up or down — shaped most by natural variability in the system (as with the recent plateau in temperatures). But humanity, by acting in ways that blunt emissions of greenhouse gases, can significantly affect the rate of warming and other related conditions from mid century onward. That’s a time scale that people can reasonably understand. Energy and environmental policies being considered now can matter not just to great grandchildren, but to many global citizens alive today.
Bookmarks