Members banned from this thread: The Dude and monty1


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 41

Thread: Free speech dying.....

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    When even one American, who has done nothing wrong, is forced by fear to shut his
    mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril.
    === Harry Truman


    The further a society drifts from the truth, the more they will hate those that speak it.- George Orwell
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to NOVA For This Post:

    wanderingbear (09-17-2013)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,703
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOVA View Post
    When even one American, who has done nothing wrong, is forced by fear to shut his
    mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril.
    === Harry Truman


    The further a society drifts from the truth, the more they will hate those that speak it.- George Orwell
    Isn't it ironic, you advocating unlimited free speech, yet dismissing me.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    christiefan915 (09-17-2013), Rune (09-17-2013)

  5. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    Isn't it ironic, you advocating unlimited free speech, yet dismissing me.
    Me ?...advocating unlimited free speech ?....damn...now where did I say that....? Or are you talking about Harry Truman or George Orwell ?

    Never mind... just rhetorical questions....I don't care what your opinion is.
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,703
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOVA View Post
    Me ?...advocating unlimited free speech ?....damn...now where did I say that....? Or are you talking about Harry Truman or George Orwell ?

    Never mind... just rhetorical questions....I don't care what your opinion is.
    Okay, if you aren't advocating unlimited free speech, what is the point of your posts?

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Rune (09-17-2013), tekkychick (09-17-2013)

  8. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    Okay, if you aren't advocating unlimited free speech, what is the point of your posts?
    Nothing. Idiots don't need a point when they blabber.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    Phantasmal (09-17-2013), tekkychick (09-17-2013), zappasguitar (09-18-2013)

  10. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,625
    Thanks
    65,445
    Thanked 38,188 Times in 25,723 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    There was no freedom of speech then, at least not to criticize religion or government.

    It is why freedom to criticize the government was incorporated into our Constitution. I do not believe it means all forms of speech, otherwise, there would be no laws controlling pornography, slander or libel.
    I know I keep bringing this up but you remember ten years ago when we criticized bush for Iraq, righties were telling us we should be tried for treason?

    Free speech indeed.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Phantasmal (09-17-2013), tekkychick (09-17-2013)

  12. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,241
    Thanks
    8,838
    Thanked 3,547 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Groans
    177
    Groaned 222 Times in 203 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    He is allowed free speech, there are just consequences for the things you say.
    Exactly. If you aren't willing to accept the consequences, don't say it.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to tekkychick For This Post:

    Phantasmal (09-17-2013)

  14. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,241
    Thanks
    8,838
    Thanked 3,547 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Groans
    177
    Groaned 222 Times in 203 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tekkychick View Post
    Exactly. If you aren't willing to accept the consequences, don't say it.
    This guy isn't being imprisoned. He's free to say it. His employer is free to say his views don't match with theirs and to fire him.

    Happens to union organizers, right?

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tekkychick For This Post:

    christiefan915 (09-17-2013), Phantasmal (09-17-2013), Rune (09-17-2013)

  16. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    There was no freedom of speech then, at least not to criticize religion or government.
    Yes there was, there was just consequences for the things they said


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  17. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tekkychick View Post
    This guy isn't being imprisoned. He's free to say it. His employer is free to say his views don't match with theirs and to fire him.

    Happens to union organizers, right?
    This has nothing to do with someone losing his job....he didn't lose his job.

    When even one American, who has done nothing wrong, is forced by fear to shut his
    mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril.
    === Harry Truman
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  18. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    It's not a full day unless bravo has a thread that is a complete and utter FAIL.

    This has nothing to do w/ "free speech" bravs.

  19. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cancel 2020.1 For This Post:

    christiefan915 (09-18-2013), Rune (09-17-2013), tekkychick (09-17-2013)

  20. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Lets try another example..

    "The reports on the NDA are accurate. We're getting people who call," Wolf said Monday during an event marking the launch of the Citizens' Commission on Benghazi, a panel of former military and intelligence officials who are investigating unanswered questions surrounding the Benghazi incident.

    Wolf's office first received the anonymous call earlier in the summer, soon after CNN and Fox News reported on the NDAs and polygraph tests.

    The caller told Wolf's staff that an unnamed CIA employee has been suspended after refusing to sign a Benghazi-related NDA.

    "My office received a call from a man saying that he knew a CIA employee who has retained legal counsel because he has refused to sign an additional NDA regarding the Sept. 11, 2012, events in Benghazi," Wolf said in Sept. 9 remarks at a panel discussion hosted by Judicial Watch.

    "I called the law firm and spoke with CIA employee's attorney who confirmed that her client is having an issue with the agency and the firm is trying to address it," Wolf said. "Based on my past experiences with the CIA, which is headquartered in my congressional district, I am not at all confident that these efforts will be successful."

    The NDA agreements are meant to instill fear in employees and stop them from speaking "to the media or Congress," Wolf said on Monday.
    -- http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/co...azi-suspended/

    When even one American, who has done nothing wrong, is forced by fear to shut his
    mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril.
    === Harry Truman

    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  21. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,703
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Capgras View Post
    Yes there was, there was just consequences for the things they said
    Lol, okay

  22. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Mpls., MN
    Posts
    493
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked 407 Times in 226 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 15 Times in 14 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOVA View Post
    When even one American, who has done nothing wrong, is forced by fear to shut his
    mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril.
    === Harry Truman
    I've just read your lousy review of Margaret's concert ...

    Some day I hope to meet you. When that happens you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!
    === Harry Truman
    "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."

    ~ Jonathan Swift

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sedan For This Post:

    christiefan915 (09-18-2013), Phantasmal (09-17-2013)

  24. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    269
    Thanks
    287
    Thanked 62 Times in 51 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 38 Times in 32 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    He is allowed free speech, there are just consequences for the things you say.
    Yes consequences. Where have I read that before? I remember the 20 million Stalin murdered and 45 million Mao murdered.. Yes, those consequences ..
    http://www.ibtimes.com/how-many-peop...n-kill-1111789
    In February 1989, two years before the fall of the Soviet Union, a research paper by Georgian historian Roy Aleksandrovich Medvedev published in the weekly tabloid Argumenti i Fakti estimated that the death toll directly attributable to Stalin’s rule amounted to some 20 million lives (on top of the estimated 20 million Soviet troops and civilians who perished in the Second World War), for a total tally of 40 million.

    ''It's important that they published it, although the numbers themselves are horrible,'' Medvedev told the New York Times at the time.

    ''Those numbers include my father.''

    Medevedev's grim bookkeeping included the following tragic episodes: 1 million imprisoned or exiled between 1927 to 1929; 9 to 11 million peasants forced off their lands and another 2 to 3 million peasants arrested or exiled in the mass collectivization program; 6 to 7 million killed by an artificial famine in 1932-1934; 1 million exiled from Moscow and Leningrad in 1935; 1 million executed during the ''Great Terror'' of 1937-1938; 4 to 6 million dispatched to forced labor camps; 10 to 12 million people forcibly relocated during World War II; and at least 1 million arrested for various “political crimes” from 1946 to 1953.

    Although not everyone who was swept up in the aforementioned events died from unnatural causes, Medvedev’s 20 million non-combatant deaths estimate is likely a conservative guess.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...s-2081630.html Mr Dikötter, who has been studying Chinese rural history from 1958 to 1962, when the nation was facing a famine, compared the systematic torture, brutality, starvation and killing of Chinese peasants to the Second World War in its magnitude. At least 45 million people were worked, starved or beaten to death in China over these four years; the worldwide death toll of the Second World War was 55 million.

    Mr Dikötter is the only author to have delved into the Chinese archives since they were reopened four years ago. He argued that this devastating period of history – which has until now remained hidden – has international resonance. "It ranks alongside the gulags and the Holocaust as one of the three greatest events of the 20th century.... It was like [the Cambodian communist dictator] Pol Pot's genocide multiplied 20 times over," he said.

Similar Threads

  1. Free Speech too expensive
    By Blackwater Lunchbreak in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2011, 08:00 AM
  2. So much for free speech
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 06:14 AM
  3. What is 'Free Speech'?
    By Lowaicue in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-30-2011, 08:39 PM
  4. CFR Against Free Speech
    By Timshel in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 11:13 AM
  5. Free Speech
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-05-2008, 08:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •