christiefan915 (09-11-2013), tekkychick (09-11-2013)
Members banned from this thread: RockX |
christiefan915 (09-11-2013), tekkychick (09-11-2013)
By striking in Syria, how will this punish Assad? His ountry is lready at war trying to overthrow him, so what is the purpose? Will we hit his peronal residence? His family?
What do you see as the outcome of the strike? Will Iran, Russia and Syria hit US targets or do you see them cooperating with the US as a result?
Thanks
I am still trying to wrap my head around all this and not finding a good solution.
Rune (09-11-2013)
tekkychick (09-11-2013)
All very good questions. If the outcome of this is Iran going after US targets - we shouldn't do it. (and there is NO WAY Russia would go after US targets; Syria might, but not sure they can reach any). If Iran goes after Israel because of US targeting Syria - that would be a bad outcome. If we expect that, we shouldn't strike at Syria, we should come up with something else.
If we don't have "good" targets - i.e. military targets relatively isolated from civilians - we shouldn't do it.
Of course, at this point this is moot - we threatened; Assad & Russia have cobbled up a solution that will work; let's hope it actually happens. At this point in time, we have no reason to attack Syria.
War IS hell; often there are NO good solutions. I'm crossing my fingers that the diplomatic solution works. Because I don't see any good alternatives whether we bomb or don't bomb.
Funny how Bush, the abject retard, fooled all those smart Democrats and nearly all the world's intelligence agencies.
We'll call him a savant chickenhawk.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Who woulda thunk she was fooled by Bush?
Yeah, I remember the weapons inspector *YOU* listened to; Scott Ritter. The guy who swore Saddam was building an arsenal, until Saddam starting feeding him a steady diet of underaged girls. Then Ritter's whole story changed.
Since then he's been arrested numerous times as an internet predator, gone to prison for preying on underaged girls, and through it all he remains your hero and Iraq War mentor.
You must be so proud. Dickwad.
Big Money (09-11-2013)
Meanwhile, I also remember weapons inspectors complaining of not being able to inspect sites, waiting hours while convoys of trucks came to the site, loaded up, and drove away.
I remember that.
Big Money (09-11-2013)
christiefan915 (09-11-2013), Minister of Truth (09-11-2013), tekkychick (09-11-2013)
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Big Money (09-11-2013)
Bookmarks