Originally Posted by
PostmodernProphet
odd....it certainly looks like my point.......yes, I remember it well.....it IS my point.....perhaps you didn't look at it in the daylight.....
how about zombie bacteria......or at the very least, a carcass or two.....
why wait a couple hundred years?.....wouldn't it be smarter to look at those that fall more recently?.....
Originally Posted by
PostmodernProphet
?....from your link......
is this you, relying on the science that exists?.....
We are talking about bacteria. They don't leave much of a carcass behind and their remnants are almost immediately absorbed by other bacteria. If they don't fossilize the chance that we will find anything is very small. Even if we did find them we would have to somehow prove they were not terrestrial.
Absolutely, this is me relying on the science that exists. The articles demonstrate the fallacy of your claim that we should have been able to easily find the signs of dead bacteria in meteorites that have fallen for the last two hundred years. It's not an easy task and though some will argue these signs have been found the evidence is not conclusive or compelling for the reasons I explained.
As was explained by the paper you did not read, we are more likely to find conclusive proof on other planets/moons where they won't be contaminated by terrestrial life. You now seem to be absurdly demanding that I defend this paper that you previously argued was science proving and destroying my beliefs in evolution. I don't intend to defend it. I don't know that they are right and I don't believe they have sufficient proof. I am simply pointing out why your criticisms are stupid.
Leviticus 19:33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not do him wrong. 34 The stranger that sojourneth with you shall be unto you as the homeborn among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
Bookmarks