If homosexuality is genetic

[Big Money]

How come homosexuals haven't died out?

[canceled.2021.1]

Stop usin logic. Everyone knows it is a choice. Even Howey and Twkkychicj admitted as much

[Howey]

Stupidity is genetic.

Bigotry is learned behavior. See above.

[Canceled.2014.1]

If you are claiming that all genetic variations that stop reproduction will die out, you need to retake high school biology.

[Big Money]

If you are claiming that all genetic variations that stop reproduction will die out, you need to retake high school biology.

How do homosexuals reproduce?

[Canceled.2014.1]

How do homosexuals reproduce?

If homosexuality is genetic, it is obviously a recessive gene.

Also, many homosexuals reproduce via coitus with a member of the opposite sex. Whether they are hiding their orientation or simply using a low-tech method for conception is largely irrelevant.

[Big Money]

If homosexuality is genetic, it is obviously a recessive gene. Also, many homosexuals reproduce via coitus with a member of the opposite sex. Whether they are hiding their orientation or simply using a low-tech method for conception is largely irrelevant.

Are the offspring of these unions homosexual?

[Canceled.2014.1]

Are the offspring of these unions homosexual?

Since the offspring of straights can be gay, I would say not.

Are you saying that proves something?

[Big Money]

Since the offspring of straights can be gay, I would say not. Are you saying that proves something?

Are you?

[Canceled.2014.1]

Are you?

No I am not. The question is, do you understand genetics well enough to have a discussion about it. The OP suggests you do not.

[canceled.2021.1]

Heterosexuality is genetic.

Homosexuality is learned behavior. See above.

Fixed it for ya

[Big Money]

No I am not. The question is, do you understand genetics well enough to have a discussion about it. The OP suggests you do not.

I asked for information because I don't understand the subject. Wasn't that clear?

Now, do you have any knowledge of the subject to share?

[canceled.2021.1]

If homosexuality is genetic, it is obviously a recessive gene.

Also, many homosexuals reproduce via coitus with a member of the opposite sex. Whether they are hiding their orientation or simply using a low-tech method for conception is largely irrelevant.

Sorta violates the hole being queer thing then. Makes it seem more like a choice.

I dot mind watching your side twist itself in knots.

Triple F admitted it is a choice and he would know given e is a queer

[Canceled.2014.1]

I asked for information because I don't understand the subject. Wasn't that clear?

Now, do you have any knowledge of the subject to share?

That is unlike your previous behavior on these forums.

Whether homosexuality is genetic, environmental, or a combination of the two has not be determined. But if homosexuality is genetic it would not mean it would kill off those carrying the gene. If it is a recessive gene, it only surfaces in certain circumstances. The dominant gene would win out most of the time. If heterosexuality is 'H' and homosexuality is 'h', then a mating of a couple that both carried the recessive gene 'h' would result in one of the following: HH, Hh, and hh. And the HH and hh would each be a 1-in-4 while the Hh would be 2-in-4 (or half). Since there may be other factors involved, it could be even more rare than that.

I hope this helps. I am impressed that you said you did not understand and asked.

[Big Money]

That is unlike your previous behavior on these forums.

Whether homosexuality is genetic, environmental, or a combination of the two has not be determined. But if homosexuality is genetic it would not mean it would kill off those carrying the gene. If it is a recessive gene, it only surfaces in certain circumstances. The dominant gene would win out most of the time. If heterosexuality is 'H' and homosexuality is 'h', then a mating of a couple that both carried the recessive gene 'h' would result in one of the following: HH, Hh, and hh. And the HH and hh would each be a 1-in-4 while the Hh would be 2-in-4 (or half). Since there may be other factors involved, it could be even more rare than that.

I hope this helps. I am impressed that you said you did not understand and asked.

Thanks.