Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 82

Thread: Defending the Constitution?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default Defending the Constitution?

    So much for their vaunted claim of "defending the constitution."

    It's just great how hypocritical Tightie Righties get to pick and choose which amendments they think are important.

    GOP Bill Seeks To Force Welfare Applicants To Waive Fourth Amendment Rights

    Rep. Stephen Fincher (R-TN) introduced a bill in the House Friday that would require states that want to receive full funding for welfare assistance to force its citizens to waive their Fourth Amendment rights and submit to random drug testing. In a press release, Fincher describes the Welfare Integrity Act of 2013:

    The bill requires each state participating in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program to certify that applicants and current recipients are being randomly test for illegal drug use. In order to pass constitutional muster, the bill requires states to provide a consent and waiver form, where applicants are given the choice to waive their Fourth Amendment Rights and submit to a random drug test. If welfare beneficiaries fail a drug test or are arrested on a drug related offense, they will be unable to receive the benefit and cannot reapply for one year. Further, the legislation requires states that receive funding from the TANF program to certify that there is a program in place to test 20% of applicants and recipients for illegal drugs. States that do not comply would forfeit 10% of their TANF funding.

    A federal appeals court has already blocked Florida’s mandatory drug-testing law, making it clear a blanket testing of public assistance applicants is likely unconstitutional. “The simple fact of seeking public assistance does not deprive a TANF applicant of the same constitutional protection from unreasonable searches that all other citizens enjoy,” the court held.

    In a remarkable acknowledgment of the constitutional problems with the bill, the text of Fincher’s legislation actually calls for states to require citizens to “sign a waiver of constitutional rights with respect to testing.” Fincher suggests in his press release that the waiver is not forced because applicants can opt not to apply for benefits, but the federal appeals court made clear in its recent decision that a coerced waiver violates “the well settled doctrine of ‘unconstitutional conditions,’ the government may not require a person to give up a constitutional right . . . in exchange for a discretionary benefit conferred by the government where the benefit sought has little or no relationship to [the right].” The bill, then, would seek to require every state that wants to maintain its current level of funding to pass its own unconstitutional law.

    As the Huffington Post points out, the bill is unlikely to succeed. Similar legislation introduced in 2011 “garned just seven cosponsors and failed to clear a committee.” But state bills that impose drug testing on applicants and beneficiaries are seeing increasing success, and at least seven states have already passed legislation requiring some form of drug testing for public assistance applicants or recipients. Mitt Romney even endorsed the idea during his presidential campaign.


    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...ndment-rights/

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    So much for their vaunted claim of "defending the constitution."

    It's just great how hypocritical Tightie Righties get to pick and choose which amendments they think are important.
    that's damned hilarious, coming from you and your 2nd Amendment hatred.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    that's damned hilarious, coming from you and your 2nd Amendment hatred.

    Except I've never claimed I wanted the 2nd amendment repealed, have I?

    Once again we see you can't discuss the topic honestly...why do I even try?

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Except I've never claimed I wanted the 2nd amendment repealed, have I?
    no, you simply say that nobody should be able to carry a gun except military and police, which is essentially the same thing as repealing it.

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Once again we see you can't discuss the topic honestly...why do I even try?
    once again we see you trying to wordsmith your way out of your hypocrisy and failing miserably.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    6,982
    Thanks
    605
    Thanked 3,439 Times in 2,220 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 86 Times in 85 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Except I've never claimed I wanted the 2nd amendment repealed, have I?

    Once again we see you can't discuss the topic honestly...why do I even try?
    I have to take a drug test annually (and be available for random testing) in order to keep my job. Am I forfeiting my 4th Amendment rights?

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    no, you simply say that nobody should be able to carry a gun except military and police, which is essentially the same thing as repealing it.

    once again we see you trying to wordsmith your way out of your hypocrisy and failing miserably.

    I have NEVER SAID only the police and military should be allowed to carry a gun...that is another bullshit lie!

    Once again wee see you resorting to outright LIES in order to make up what you think I believe.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinterBorn View Post
    I have to take a drug test annually (and be available for random testing) in order to keep my job. Am I forfeiting my 4th Amendment rights?

    There is a difference between agreeing with the rules of employment required by a private employer and the Federal Government forcing welfare applicants to surrender their 4th amendment rights.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to zappasguitar For This Post:

    Rune (03-06-2013)

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,830
    Thanks
    102,838
    Thanked 55,261 Times in 33,911 Posts
    Groans
    3,192
    Groaned 5,089 Times in 4,704 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinterBorn View Post
    I have to take a drug test annually (and be available for random testing) in order to keep my job. Am I forfeiting my 4th Amendment rights?
    I believe drug testing is an invasion of your right to privacy, even if you agree to it to keep your job. I think it is coercion, you either take the test or lose your job, even though you are not a drug user.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Rune (03-06-2013), The Dude (03-06-2013)

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    I believe drug testing is an invasion of your right to privacy, even if you agree to it to keep your job. I think it is coercion, you either take the test or lose your job, even though you are not a drug user.

    So much for your presumption of innocence...

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zappasguitar For This Post:

    Phantasmal (03-05-2013), Rune (03-06-2013)

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    I have NEVER SAID only the police and military should be allowed to carry a gun...that is another bullshit lie!

    Once again wee see you resorting to outright LIES in order to make up what you think I believe.
    you lie, plain and simple. you know it, we know it. you should just surrender now, your hypocrisy is showing badly.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Boston MA
    Posts
    4,237
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked 326 Times in 295 Posts
    Groans
    38
    Groaned 1,012 Times in 951 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    There is a difference between agreeing with the rules of employment required by a private employer and the Federal Government forcing welfare applicants to surrender their 4th amendment rights.
    Welfare scum are employed by the government to live a life of ease, they too should be subject to drug tests, just like soldiers, FBI agents, cops etc.
    Drug test one, drug test all.
    That's it.
    That old EQUALITY thing that YOU totalitarians DESPISE.

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    you lie, plain and simple. you know it, we know it. you should just surrender now, your hypocrisy is showing badly.

    Well if I lie, then you should have no problem providing evidence to back up your allegation.

    Go...find a single comment from me stating I want ONLY the police and military to carry a gun.

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Well if I lie, then you should have no problem providing evidence to back up your allegation.

    Go...find a single comment from me stating I want ONLY the police and military to carry a gun.
    stop wordsmithing. it makes you look dumber than you already are. by stating that you don't believe anyone should be allowed to carry a gun, you make your intentions and desires very clear.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  17. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    25,047
    Thanks
    7,108
    Thanked 10,681 Times in 7,373 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 007 View Post
    Welfare scum are employed by the government to live a life of ease, they too should be subject to drug tests, just like soldiers, FBI agents, cops etc.
    Drug test one, drug test all.
    That's it.
    That old EQUALITY thing that YOU totalitarians DESPISE.
    If welfare recipients must be drug tested to receive funds, then ALL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES must be tested to receive a check, from the Governor on down.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to zappasguitar For This Post:

    Rune (03-06-2013)

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    6,982
    Thanks
    605
    Thanked 3,439 Times in 2,220 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 86 Times in 85 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    There is a difference between agreeing with the rules of employment required by a private employer and the Federal Government forcing welfare applicants to surrender their 4th amendment rights.
    I surrender my rights in order to get, and keep, a job.

    They can do the same thing to get gov't benefits.

  20. The Following User Groans At Canceled.2014.1 For This Awful Post:

    Rune (03-06-2013)

Similar Threads

  1. Is this why the Obama Regime is defending Pennsylvania?
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-30-2012, 09:26 AM
  2. DNC... defending our country... with Russian War Ships...
    By Cancel 2016.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 09-18-2012, 03:14 PM
  3. Defending another cowardly killer of the unarmed?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-10-2012, 04:55 AM
  4. Corporate Lobbyists Thank Clinton for Defending Them
    By Cypress in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 06:18 AM
  5. Dano first to talk about defending the aliban guy.
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 05:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •