Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: WAY OT: Did the KC Chiefs just go full retard?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default WAY OT: Did the KC Chiefs just go full retard?

    (Please Lord, I hope this is true!) Being reported that the Chiefs are giving up a 2nd round pick this year and a 'similar' pick next year for Alex Smith. Yes atheists, there is a God!



  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Smith's not even that great (he is definitely really good with a track record). If you want to get a stellar QB who has been relegated to back-up, I would recommend Matt Flynn (who I think is one of the NFL's greatest, but only time will tell) or Kirk Cousins. Hell, even Nick Foles is worth the investment since he's just coming off his rookie year with a shitty team.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    2nd round pick this year (though it is number 34 over all) and a mid rounder next year...

    Given the weak ass crap available at QB in the draft, a 2nd rounder is fine with me to get an above average starting QB.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    Smith's not even that great (he is definitely really good with a track record). If you want to get a stellar QB who has been relegated to back-up, I would recommend Matt Flynn (who I think is one of the NFL's greatest, but only time will tell) or Kirk Cousins. Hell, even Nick Foles is worth the investment since he's just coming off his rookie year with a shitty team.
    1) Flynn is too expensive and he is unproven.
    2) Cousins is not leaving DC... not with the injuries to RGIII
    3) Foles is worthless

    Smith is not great... but he is above average and has developed enough to not lose games for you... ala Matt Cassel.

    No QBs this year in the draft worth that second rounder they just gave up... so it will have to do for now.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    2nd round pick this year (though it is number 34 over all) and a mid rounder next year...

    Given the weak ass crap available at QB in the draft, a 2nd rounder is fine with me to get an above average starting QB.
    It's being reported locally that the pick next year is basically a 2nd rounder as well. If it were one second round pick and mid round then the trade doesn't look so bad to me. Two 2nd rounders seems high.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    It's being reported locally that the pick next year is basically a 2nd rounder as well. If it were one second round pick and mid round then the trade doesn't look so bad to me. Two 2nd rounders seems high.
    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/89...-chiefs-source

    Contingent on how he plays next year... they say conditional mid round pick... so I would guess not another 2nd... but who knows.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    It's a little steep, but I'd be stoked if I was a Chiefs fan. Smith may not be elite or anything, but he'll be a solid QB for years - something they haven't had in a long time. It's worth it to lock down that position.

    I'm sure 49ers fans are happy, as well.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.1 For This Post:

    Phantasmal (02-27-2013)

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,772
    Thanks
    102,694
    Thanked 55,165 Times in 33,863 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    Smith's not even that great (he is definitely really good with a track record). If you want to get a stellar QB who has been relegated to back-up, I would recommend Matt Flynn (who I think is one of the NFL's greatest, but only time will tell) or Kirk Cousins. Hell, even Nick Foles is worth the investment since he's just coming off his rookie year with a shitty team.
    The Eagles are keeping Foles.

    Cawako, I didn't see anything about giving up our pick...

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    Good deal for chiefs, 2 second rounders could be non starters.

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    It's a little steep, but I'd be stoked if I was a Chiefs fan. Smith may not be elite or anything, but he'll be a solid QB for years - something they haven't had in a long time. It's worth it to lock down that position.

    I'm sure 49ers fans are happy, as well.
    I don't know about stoked, but I think this was a no brainer. As a Chiefs fan, it has been painful with Matt Cassel. As you said, we haven't had a good QB since Trent Green.

    Smith is solid and won't tend to cost us games. Chiefs now have many options with the number one. They can trade our current LT Albert and pick up the A&M LT with the number one (which I hope they do). Or they can resign Albert and try and trade down to regain picks.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    I think Gino Smith could pleasantly surprise whichever fanbase he winds up getting drafted into.
    He could develop, but he is not ready to start. None of them are this year. Which is why the Chiefs had to move on Smith.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    20,135
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 4,725 Times in 2,959 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 333 Times in 317 Posts

    Default

    Alex Smith is not a long-term solution to the QB problem in Kansas City. Chiefs gave up quite a bit for a placeholder. Could have used those draft picks to improve at other positions. I mean, it's not as though the QB position is the only position of need.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Bonestorm For This Post:

    Phantasmal (02-27-2013)

  16. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    20,135
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 4,725 Times in 2,959 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 333 Times in 317 Posts

    Default

    And I'm not saying Smith isn't an upgrade. He most definitely is. I just don't think he is the QB of the future for KC.

  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dungheap View Post
    Alex Smith is not a long-term solution to the QB problem in Kansas City. Chiefs gave up quite a bit for a placeholder. Could have used those draft picks to improve at other positions. I mean, it's not as though the QB position is the only position of need.
    1) It was the biggest team need, by far... no other position is even remotely as weak.

    2) True that A. Smith is not a long term solution... but a second round pick plus a mid rounder next year is not a lot for a starting QB (for 3-5 years) who has proven he can win in this league. The other option was what at QB? An unproven rookie?

    3) We still have the number one overall pick... we have a lot of options, especially if anyone else wants to trade up.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

Similar Threads

  1. Chiefs do what Donkeys FAILED to do!
    By Socrtease in forum Sports, Hobbies & Pictures
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-23-2009, 10:58 AM
  2. Who is the biggest retard?
    By The Anonymous in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-21-2009, 02:32 PM
  3. Joint Chiefs chair: US prepping military options against Iran
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 07:12 PM
  4. White House: Bush, Joint Chiefs not 'locking horns'
    By NewsBoy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2006, 10:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •