Justify banning this rifle...

[sPzAbt505]

... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.



Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.

[/MSG/]

It's black. Reason enough to hate anything.

[The Dude]

NRAZI must defend 10,000 murders

[Cancel 2018. 3]

the NRA does not defend murder you lying libtard

[Howey]

the NRA does not defend murder you lying libtard

**cough**

**cough**

George Zimmerman


**cough**

**cough**

[sPzAbt505]

It's black. Reason enough to hate anything.

Best reason so far.

[USFREEDOM911]

**cough**

**cough**

George Zimmerman


**cough**

**cough**

**cough**

**cough**

Murder is the unlawful killing, with malice aforethought

**cough**

**cough**

Howie fails again.

[The Dude]

NRAZI hillbilly

[Anti-Party]

... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.



Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.

This is just another thread, with a picture of a "look-a-like" gun hoping to lure in someone to say, "yea, ban it!" What whis would prove in this VERY impressive mind is that people who don't know and study guns on a regular basis or don't know much about guns at all have no room to talk in this debate.

Next will be a line up of bullets, some bigger than others. (Modified Assault Rifles carry a smaller bullet for less weight so you can shoot one target and whip the rifle to the next target. Unlike deer rifles which are heavy and more similar to sniper rifles)

Then when someone says, "ban that rifle" he justifies that a BB gun or whatever he has in his picture, is "Only scary looking".

It's just a pathetic attempt for Libertarian cultists to keep military style weapons so they can start a war. (Yes, Libertardians want to start a civil war.) They can't figure out where all their money is going so they listen to cult leaders and it's all going to lazy black people in their minds.

[/MSG/]

This is just another thread, with a picture of a "look-a-like" gun hoping to lure in someone to say, "yea, ban it!" What whis would prove in this VERY impressive mind is that people who don't know and study guns on a regular basis or don't know much about guns at all have no room to talk in this debate.

Next will be a line up of bullets, some bigger than others. (Modified Assault Rifles carry a smaller bullet for less weight so you can shoot one target and whip the rifle to the next target. Unlike deer rifles which are heavy and more similar to sniper rifles)

Then when someone says, "ban that rifle" he justifies that a BB gun or whatever he has in his picture, is "Only scary looking".

It's just a pathetic attempt for Libertarian cultists to keep military style weapons so they can start a war. (Yes, Libertardians want to start a civil war.) They can't figure out where all their money is going so they listen to cult leaders and it's all going to lazy black people in their minds.

So when argueing about the technical minutia of guns, experts are to be ignored and legislation is to be based on emotion?

[Minister of Truth]

This is just another thread, with a picture of a "look-a-like" gun hoping to lure in someone to say, "yea, ban it!" What whis would prove in this VERY impressive mind is that people who don't know and study guns on a regular basis or don't know much about guns at all have no room to talk in this debate. Next will be a line up of bullets, some bigger than others. (Modified Assault Rifles carry a smaller bullet for less weight so you can shoot one target and whip the rifle to the next target. Unlike deer rifles which are heavy and more similar to sniper rifles)Then when someone says, "ban that rifle" he justifies that a BB gun or whatever he has in his picture, is "Only scary looking". It's just a pathetic attempt for Libertarian cultists to keep military style weapons so they can start a war. (Yes, Libertardians want to start a civil war.) They can't figure out where all their money is going so they listen to cult leaders and it's all going to lazy black people in their minds.

NO THEY DON'T!!

[BRUTALITOPS]

alright sPzAbt505 you are getting an exclusive invite.

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

It's just a pathetic attempt for Libertarian cultists to keep military style weapons so they can start a war.

Back in the late 60s and early 70s, due to an ever-growing consumer market, southern cuisine began to gain popularity around the country. Market researchers quickly discovered their "southern-style" products weren't selling well in some areas, and it was because of negative stigma attached to "southern." They began experimenting with various other words they could use to describe "southern" in order to overcome this negative stigma. The most common was "country-style." To this day, whether it is cooking, canned goods, meat products, or other traditional "southern" things merchandised, they are most likely sold as "country-style."

Thanks to the media misleading people, and the propaganda rhetoric from the left, most Americans actually believe the "AR" designation in "AR-15" stands for "assault rifle," but it doesn't. It stands for "Armalite." The description of "military style" is ambiguous in meaning. If something is camouflage, it is "military style." The marketing advantage is obvious, people who are interested in a rifle, would naturally be interested in the style used by the military, since the military is who most people consider to be the ultimate authority on rifles. It's important to remember that "military style" doesn't mean "military issue." These are, for the most part, not weapons the military would ever actually use. They usually have some cosmetic feature which is similar to a military weapon, and sometimes the operation and mechanisms function in the same way, with regard to design. They may be lighter, more portable and easier to carry long distances. None of these attributes make them "more dangerous" or "more violent" than any other weapon available. Crazy people can kill someone just as easy with a "country style" barbecue rib!

[007]

**cough**

**cough**

George Zimmerman


**cough**

**cough**

Guilty until you ignore the law and still guilty whatever the facts of the case!

Trayvon Martin was a violent criminal.
Liberals always support criminals !

[Anti-Party]

So when argueing about the technical minutia of guns, experts are to be ignored and legislation is to be based on emotion?

I didn't say anything even remotely close to that. Please read my posts before responding to them.

I was simply saying this is a worn out strategy to paint people as "not knowing anything about modified assault rifles". Because in your brain, it's a win and proves they aren't dangerous. (naive)

It's why I'm in favor of limited mags but not banning specific guns until the technology gets REALLY out of hand. Gun manufacturers are making morphs to make it nearly impossible to draw a line on guns. And 10-30 rounds in a modified assault rifle is not that much more dangerous than a deer rifle, only lighter weight. But add the 100 round drum mag and there is a clear difference. Especially since we know it's easy to modify a gun to full auto. *Save your mag arguments. They just make you sound extremely.........uninformed * "