Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Starbucks, Google And Amazon Face MPs On Tax

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default Starbucks, Google And Amazon Face MPs On Tax

    Starbucks reportedly paid just £8.6m in corporation tax in 14 years of trading in Britain. It was also revealed it paid no corporation tax for the past three years, despite sales of £1.2bn in the UK.


    Amazon, Britain's largest online retailer generated UK sales over the past three years of between £7.6bn and £10.3bn, but paid virtually no corporation tax.


    http://news.sky.com/story/1010332/st...ace-mps-on-tax

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Executives from Amazon, Google and Starbucks give evidence before the Public Accounts Committee on the issue of tax avoidance.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...-happened.html

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    So now we know: the sickly sweet smell that hits you when you go into a branch of Starbucks does not emanate only from their coffee.

    The nauseating stink comes all the way from Seattle, where the company is based. It is the stench of corporate hypocrisy. Starbucks is a global corporation, second only to McDonald’s in the world, with a billion-pound business in Britain. Yet we are told the company has paid practically no tax here since it began trading 14 years ago. So much for the ‘ethics’ and ‘responsibility’ that it boasts of on its website.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/new...hypocrisy.html
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 11-14-2012 at 09:26 AM.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    7,020
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 1,567 Times in 1,114 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 272 Times in 246 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aoxomoxoa View Post
    Starbucks reportedly paid just £8.6m in corporation tax in 14 years of trading in Britain. It was also revealed it paid no corporation tax for the past three years, despite sales of £1.2bn in the UK.


    Amazon, Britain's largest online retailer generated UK sales over the past three years of between £7.6bn and £10.3bn, but paid virtually no corporation tax.


    http://news.sky.com/story/1010332/st...ace-mps-on-tax
    I visited Starbucks once. They didn't sell Nescafe which is what I like and I had to learn faux Italian before I could get a cup of anything. Haven't been since. Wife buys rather nice veggie pies though while I am next door gnawing the leg off a passing cat.
    Amazon involves buying stuff over the internet from lying Americans (sorry - tautology) and I dont trust Google with my info.
    I cannot see the logic of purchasing something I will surely have when I get home. Bit like that other nonsense brand 'Subway'.
    Who would buy a sarni from a shop? If I go to a restaurant I want something that either I dont get at home or something which is a pain in the arse to prepare. Not sandwiches and coffee.
    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/blog.php?u=237
    If you feel so inclined a comment would be appreciated.

    Respect a believers right to believe, but they should damn well repect our right to challenge such utterly illogical notions.


  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    7,020
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 1,567 Times in 1,114 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 272 Times in 246 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aoxomoxoa View Post
    I see a tall poppy.
    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/blog.php?u=237
    If you feel so inclined a comment would be appreciated.

    Respect a believers right to believe, but they should damn well repect our right to challenge such utterly illogical notions.


Similar Threads

  1. Comments on Amazon for Veet for Men
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2012, 10:37 AM
  2. Amazon Tumbles As E-Book Pricing Model Unravels
    By Topspin in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-01-2010, 12:54 PM
  3. Amazon.com listing had Barack Obama Halloween mask under 'terrorist'
    By RockX in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-02-2008, 09:58 PM
  4. Starbucks CEO says no "silver bullet" for fixing Starbucks
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 03-22-2008, 05:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •