Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: A job for Mitt Romney

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Web
    Posts
    3,941
    Thanks
    2,893
    Thanked 1,515 Times in 1,038 Posts
    Groans
    1,872
    Groaned 276 Times in 251 Posts

    Thumbs up A job for Mitt Romney

    Multimillionaire Mitt Romney clearly doesn’t need a job. He is, after all, one of the “1 percent.” But if President Obama wants to enlist his help in avoiding the fiscal cliff, he could do worse than to approach Romney about replacing Tim Geithner as Treasury secretary.

    When you look at the composition of Congress, the incoming one is much the same as the outgoing one; in other words, a recipe for continued gridlock despite the suggestion from House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) that “we’re ready to be led.” Boehner has already ruled out new taxes, so that’s not going to encourage the markets about the chances of a deal anytime soon.

    Both Obama and Romney, in their speeches on Tuesday night, talked about unity and bipartisanship in the interests of the nation. Obama reached out to former rival Hillary Clinton, who joined the Cabinet in the first term. He has said he will talk to Romney about working together — so what about offering him a job?

    Romney, although lacking a party base, which could diminish his value as a dealmaker in the corridors of Congress, chose House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as his running mate. Ryan clearly respects Romney, who touted his business skills on the campaign trail. Obama should call Romney’s bluff and put together a “team of rivals” in this time of crisis.

    You might think this is a long shot, but much to my surprise I am not alone in this campaign. None other than the New York Daily News has suggested Romney as Treasury secretary. So take off your “Romney for president” buttons and put on your “Romney for Treasury Sec” versions. Let’s see a real America’s Comeback Team.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...or-mitt-romney

    Won't happen, but it would be awesome if it did. Romney is a great public servant and probably my favorite politician - it would be sad to see him fade, especially when the country needs him. NY Daily News made the same suggestion:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/the...sury-secretary
    "We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." -O'Brien, Nineteen Eighty-Four

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Rationalist For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-09-2012)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    Is Romney an economist?

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Web
    Posts
    3,941
    Thanks
    2,893
    Thanked 1,515 Times in 1,038 Posts
    Groans
    1,872
    Groaned 276 Times in 251 Posts

    Default

    No, but neither was Lloyd Bentsen (under Clinton).
    "We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." -O'Brien, Nineteen Eighty-Four

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    Romney is off the reservation for this work except to looney rightwingers.

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,740
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 267 Times in 218 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 401 Times in 350 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    Is Romney an economist?
    Are you a dummy?

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    [QUOTE=SJJRSJJS;1110117]Are you a dummy?[/QUOTE
    Your a cook, get you ass back in the kitchen you little bitch!

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    20,135
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 4,725 Times in 2,959 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 333 Times in 317 Posts

    Default

    "None other than the New York Daily News . . ."

    LOL. Mort Zuckerman can eat the peanuts out of my sheeeeeeeit.

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    Is Romney an economist?
    I would put Romneys understanding of economics up against Geithner any day.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    I would put Romneys understanding of economics up against Geithner any day.
    And hence your a million miles from being qualified to make that call.

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,785
    Thanks
    7,190
    Thanked 12,921 Times in 7,750 Posts
    Groans
    102
    Groaned 808 Times in 757 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire View Post
    Multimillionaire Mitt Romney clearly doesn’t need a job. He is, after all, one of the “1 percent.” But if President Obama wants to enlist his help in avoiding the fiscal cliff, he could do worse than to approach Romney about replacing Tim Geithner as Treasury secretary.

    When you look at the composition of Congress, the incoming one is much the same as the outgoing one; in other words, a recipe for continued gridlock despite the suggestion from House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) that “we’re ready to be led.” Boehner has already ruled out new taxes, so that’s not going to encourage the markets about the chances of a deal anytime soon.

    Both Obama and Romney, in their speeches on Tuesday night, talked about unity and bipartisanship in the interests of the nation. Obama reached out to former rival Hillary Clinton, who joined the Cabinet in the first term. He has said he will talk to Romney about working together — so what about offering him a job?

    Romney, although lacking a party base, which could diminish his value as a dealmaker in the corridors of Congress, chose House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as his running mate. Ryan clearly respects Romney, who touted his business skills on the campaign trail. Obama should call Romney’s bluff and put together a “team of rivals” in this time of crisis.

    You might think this is a long shot, but much to my surprise I am not alone in this campaign. None other than the New York Daily News has suggested Romney as Treasury secretary. So take off your “Romney for president” buttons and put on your “Romney for Treasury Sec” versions. Let’s see a real America’s Comeback Team.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...or-mitt-romney

    Won't happen, but it would be awesome if it did. Romney is a great public servant and probably my favorite politician - it would be sad to see him fade, especially when the country needs him. NY Daily News made the same suggestion:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/the...sury-secretary
    ROTFLMAO
    DARLA: The Internet's Leading Cause of White Dude Butthurt 12 Years and Counting

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,766 Times in 27,240 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    the right will all hate robmoney in a couple of weeks so no need to give the lair any position

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Cancel 2016.11 (11-09-2012), The Dude (11-09-2012)

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    And hence your a million miles from being qualified to make that call.
    Lay down the pipe... think before you type.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  15. The Following User Groans At Cancel 2016.2 For This Awful Post:

    The Dude (11-09-2012)

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    20,135
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 4,725 Times in 2,959 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 333 Times in 317 Posts

    Default

    Maybe my memory is faulty or something, but I don't remember any Democrats saying that Al Gore (or any other Democrat, for that matter) should be appointed to a position in George W. Bush's cabinet. Near as I can tell, this is a strictly Democratic administration phenomenon.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Bonestorm For This Post:

    christiefan915 (11-09-2012)

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,766 Times in 27,240 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    Lay down the pipe... think before you type.

    why dont you tell us all how you predicted the crash?

    Oh yeah you trashed anyone who told you it was coming.

    Then you said it was not the repeal of Glass Steagal that caused it.

    then you at some point changed your mind.

    Your record is not very good super duper

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,785
    Thanks
    7,190
    Thanked 12,921 Times in 7,750 Posts
    Groans
    102
    Groaned 808 Times in 757 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dungheap View Post
    Maybe my memory is faulty or something, but I don't remember any Democrats saying that Al Gore (or any other Democrat, for that matter) should be appointed to a position in George W. Bush's cabinet. Near as I can tell, this is a strictly Democratic administration phenomenon.
    Their gall is absolutely stunning. It might have something to do with the recent proliferation of articles describing how "softly" Ann romney was "crying" after their stunning loss that not one of them saw coming. Which is terrifying. I read the articles this morning and I felt chilled to the bone. They truly did not accept the polls, the flat out did not believe them. They believed with all of their hearts they were going to win. All of them, not just Romney - everyone around him.

    I found it so chilling because for a long time I have been puzzled over how they all could pretend climate change wasn't happening since their own children and grandchildren will spit on them. Now I realize they aren't pretending.

    These people live in an alternate reality. They are clinically delusional.

    Yeah, sure, let's give em all jobs! And hey, let's enact their policies too! It wouldn't be sporting if Dems didn't act as if they hadn't just won a big election.
    DARLA: The Internet's Leading Cause of White Dude Butthurt 12 Years and Counting

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cancel 2016.11 For This Post:

    Crashk (11-09-2012), The Dude (11-09-2012)

Similar Threads

  1. Mitt Romney's Vietnam?!!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-01-2012, 09:11 PM
  2. A Message for Mitt Romney
    By Howey in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-05-2012, 06:51 AM
  3. Mitt Romney Sure Does Lie a Lot, Doesn't He?
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2012, 07:14 PM
  4. Mitt Romney Dog Story Won't Go Away
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-17-2012, 07:52 AM
  5. Two cheers for Mitt Romney!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 02-19-2010, 12:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •