Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Democrats support free speech...........................not

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default Democrats support free speech...........................not

    This is how Obama handles dissent and those that exercise their first amendment rights......


    U.S. Army axes Ted Nugent from June 23 concert at Fort Knox over anti-Obama comments

    Army will offer refunds to Nugent fans

    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Did they arrest him Bravo?
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    Did they arrest him Bravo?
    Have someone read the article to you....and find out....
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    8,173
    Thanks
    3,704
    Thanked 2,354 Times in 1,809 Posts
    Groans
    799
    Groaned 5,133 Times in 4,488 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bravo View Post
    This is how Obama handles dissent and those that exercise their first amendment rights......


    U.S. Army axes Ted Nugent from June 23 concert at Fort Knox over anti-Obama comments

    Army will offer refunds to Nugent fans

    Uh, right...you don't threaten the President and the Sec. of State, and expect to get away with it. Even the First Amendment has its' caveats, dumb dora.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bravo View Post
    Have someone read the article to you....and find out....
    I read the article retard. If he wasn't arrested, then he clearly has free speech, just like the Army has the freedom to fire his stupid ass for disrespecting their Commander. Idiot.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    Phantasmal (04-23-2012)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,441
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    He threatened the President, idiot.

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,479
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poet View Post
    Uh, right...you don't threaten the President and the Sec. of State, and expect to get away with it. Even the First Amendment has its' caveats, dumb dora.
    if he had actually threatened the president and/or the sec state, he'd have been arrested. He hasn't and he's been cleared by the Secret Service.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,479
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    He threatened the President, idiot.
    No, he didn't. the Secret Service cleared him of any wrongdoing.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    I read the article retard. If he wasn't arrested, then he clearly has free speech, just like the Army has the freedom to fire his stupid ass for disrespecting their Commander. Idiot.
    There ain't enough prison cells in the world to arrest all those that have no respect for Obama.....

    And no one was arrested for threatening Bush hundreds of times over 8 years....looks like a wash.....

    http://www.binscorner.com/pages/d/de...rotests-i.html
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,441
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post
    No, he didn't. the Secret Service cleared him of any wrongdoing.
    Okay, how's this: he lobbed a not-so-veiled death threat out there, which the Secret Service investigated & concluded that it was just Ted being Ted, and nothing serious.

    Would that work? I'm sure you love the Nuge, but there is nothing to see here as far as "infringing free speech."

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Onceler For This Post:

    Phantasmal (04-23-2012), poet (04-23-2012)

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,479
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    Okay, how's this: he lobbed a not-so-veiled death threat out there, which the Secret Service investigated & concluded that it was just Ted being Ted, and nothing serious.

    Would that work? I'm sure you love the Nuge, but there is nothing to see here as far as "infringing free speech."
    'Nuge' is a big NRA supporter. I am not, therefore I don't really give a damn about him. and if 'Nuge' was a democrat lobbing 'not so veiled threats' toward a republican, you'd be congratulating him on his intelligence and ability to know the line between free speech and criminal threats, so stop being a hypocrite.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bravo View Post
    There ain't enough prison cells in the world to arrest all those that have no respect for Obama.....

    And no one was arrested for threatening Bush hundreds of times over 8 years....looks like a wash.....

    http://www.binscorner.com/pages/d/de...rotests-i.html
    Bottom line is that the headline of this thread is a lie Bravo.

    Poor Blabo.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    poet (04-23-2012)

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,441
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post
    'Nuge' is a big NRA supporter. I am not, therefore I don't really give a damn about him. and if 'Nuge' was a democrat lobbing 'not so veiled threats' toward a republican, you'd be congratulating him on his intelligence and ability to know the line between free speech and criminal threats, so stop being a hypocrite.
    Please stop telling me what you think I'd do. You're always wrong, and you always look like an ignorant fool.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Onceler For This Post:

    poet (04-23-2012)

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    I read the article retard. If he wasn't arrested, then he clearly has free speech, just like the Army has the freedom to fire his stupid ass for disrespecting their Commander. Idiot.
    lmao

    onceler totally supports this post

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    Please stop telling me what you think I'd do. You're always wrong, and you always look like an ignorant fool.

Similar Threads

  1. So much for free speech
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 06:14 AM
  2. What is 'Free Speech'?
    By Lowaicue in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-30-2011, 08:39 PM
  3. CFR Against Free Speech
    By Timshel in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 11:13 AM
  4. Free Speech
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-05-2008, 08:44 PM
  5. Suing free speech
    By Robdawg in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-27-2007, 09:02 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •