Mott the Hoople (01-22-2012)
Mott the Hoople (01-22-2012)
Mott the Hoople (01-22-2012)
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
lol.....that looks like a panic reaction to the realization that my comment was spot on.....you know the thrill of the ride is off......people voted for the first black president, but who's going to want to brag to their kids that they voted to re-elect the man who made everything worse than Bush left it......
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
He aint even remotely close to a Reagan. If you wanted to compare him on policy he compares much more favorably to Bush 1 by far then Reagan. Romney is a blue blooded, plutocratic eastern establishment Republican. He's most certainly NOT an ideological conservative and he's nothing like Reagan in either style, substance or ideology. That's one of the worse comparisons I've ever heard.
What I do like about Romney is that he represents a fight for the heart and soul of the Republican party. Maybe this is the beginning of the end of the Southern Strategy and its extremism and the cancer it has been on the body politic in the USA. If so then Romney will be a significant political Statesman, win or lose.
What Romney represents is a return to Rockefeller Republicanism and it's mainstream values of an engaged foreign policy (and by engaged I mean diplomacy not hammer and anvil demonstrations of force) and responsible, ethical and competent governance and a distancing away from southern perochial extremism. The right wing of the Repubian party is going to loath Romney......and that's a very good thing!
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Rune (01-22-2012)
lol....so basically you favor a blue blooded, plutocratic eastern establishment Republican?......and yet, we all know you favor Obama....perhaps because those two types have so much in common.....personally, I'm a Reagan Democrat.....I don't like blue blooded, plutocratic easterners.....whether they be Republican or Democrat.......
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Actually that was a good analysis by Annie.....one of the rare times I've seen that coming from a board conservative which are usually composed of right wing rants about how Libuhrals are destroying human civilzation as they know it. You are right though, her analsis could have been more concise. She was sounding like me!
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Annie (01-22-2012)
I favor him over a southern conservative ideolouge. Though I do agree with you that I have a natural distrust of blue blooded eastern establishment plutocrats of any stripe. They have a common flaw of "What's good for us is what's good for the country". If Romney is electd his first, second, third and 385th priority will be taking care of the interest and perogatives of the upper classes and will justify that on the basis of what is good for them is what is good for you and me (which obviously isn't always the case). Having said that, integrity and competence, relevent experience and integrity are important aspects of governing responsibly and affectivly and Romney has those attributes in spades. He is a far cry from the southern conservative good ole boy corruption and incompetence as represented by the Bush II administration and if elected I think Romney would be the best Republican president since Ike.
Now I know you have an ideological detestation of Obama but the facts are out there. Obama has done a very good job of pulling us out of the Bush shit hole. Obama has a strong track record and the incumbancy as his advantage. Obama vs Romney is going to be a close election of two of the best candidates for POTUS in my life time and I'm very much looking forward to it and yes....I'm leaning towards Obama.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
cancel2 2022 (01-22-2012)
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as “bad luck.” - Robert Heinlein
icedancer2theend (01-22-2012)
Bookmarks