Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 51

Thread: Republican says RINO Paul "unelectable", cites "racist comments"

  1. #1 | Top
    Guns Guns Guns Guest

    Default Republican says RINO Paul "unelectable", cites "racist comments"

    Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman piled on criticism of Texas Rep. Ron Paul's past Thursday as he continued to hone his focus on New Hampshire with a new web ad.

    In the one minute , Huntsman questioned Paul's integrity.

    As the rest of the 2012 field flocks to Iowa ahead of the Hawkeye State's Jan. 3 caucus, Huntsman remained solely trained on the Granite State's primary held seven days later, where he's been banking on a top finish.


    Huntsman's ad targeted Paul, currently ranked second in a new CNN/Time/ORC International poll released Wednesday with 16% support among likely New Hampshire primary voters.


    Nine percent of likely New Hampshire voters backed Huntsman in the poll, placing him fourth, behind Romney in first and Gingrich in third.


    The ad begins with two spliced archival videos of the Texas congressman stating, "I deliver babies for a living but I also do an investment letter…it's called the 'Ron Paul Survival Report' and it covered a lot of what was going on in Washington."


    The footage of Paul is followed by news coverage of racist and anti-gay statements written in several newsletters also bearing Paul's name.


    When controversy over the contents of 1980s and 1990s newsletters written with his moniker reemerged recently, Paul dismissed criticism ...




    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...piles-on-paul/



  2. The Following User Groans At For This Awful Post:

    Rationalist (12-30-2011)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    the mainstream gop quietly thanks you for continuing the smear campaign.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    the mainstream gop quietly thanks you for continuing the smear campaign.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    the mainstream gop quietly thanks you for continuing the smear campaign.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    12,386
    Thanks
    877
    Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,475 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 237 Times in 228 Posts

    Default

    After watching a few Paul videos I have to say I do like his ideas about less government and more freedom, HOWEVER, we have to remember when the Constitution was written people did not depend on others to the extent we do today. For example, 200 years ago people didn't have to worry about what food additives were in animal feed or whether food was genetically modified. Would the abolishment of the USDA result in people/companies adding excess amounts of growth hormone to prepare animals for slaughter sooner? Would that result in the people eating those meat products becoming giants or would it result in cancers throughout the population?
    "May your reality be as pleasant as mine."

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    Paul is the smartest of ending the drug war. His grand wizarding is a deal breaker!

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by apple0154 View Post
    After watching a few Paul videos I have to say I do like his ideas about less government and more freedom, HOWEVER, we have to remember when the Constitution was written people did not depend on others to the extent we do today. For example, 200 years ago people didn't have to worry about what food additives were in animal feed or whether food was genetically modified. Would the abolishment of the USDA result in people/companies adding excess amounts of growth hormone to prepare animals for slaughter sooner? Would that result in the people eating those meat products becoming giants or would it result in cancers throughout the population?
    strange things about the shit you're saying. for example, if a company that is regulated by the FDA or the USDA sells a product that is later determined to be 'out of regulation', or modified, does the USDA or FDA incur a penalty of any kind?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    Paul is the smartest of ending the drug war. His grand wizarding is a deal breaker!
    your duplicity in the smear campaign marks you as a liberal apologist.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    Your lack of education leaves u a simpleton!

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    Your lack of education leaves u a simpleton!
    and that speaks volumes about your wasted education, since you've shown yourself to be such a dumbass on multiple occasions.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    The mind is a terrible thing to waist. In your case it's just terrible
    waist? hows that college degree again?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by apple0154 View Post
    After watching a few Paul videos I have to say I do like his ideas about less government and more freedom, HOWEVER, we have to remember when the Constitution was written people did not depend on others to the extent we do today. For example, 200 years ago people didn't have to worry about what food additives were in animal feed or whether food was genetically modified. Would the abolishment of the USDA result in people/companies adding excess amounts of growth hormone to prepare animals for slaughter sooner? Would that result in the people eating those meat products becoming giants or would it result in cancers throughout the population?
    "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government." - Founding Father Patrick Henry
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    anyone find it odd that every liberal on this board discredited anything that newt, romney, santorum, and bachmann had spew out of their mouths, but they are all over these out of context newsletter sentences from some ancient campaign?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lompoc, Ca
    Posts
    8,430
    Thanks
    1,286
    Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,090 Posts
    Groans
    475
    Groaned 278 Times in 249 Posts

    Default

    i used to like ron paul, i did not agree with with all of his politics, but i like his outspokenness

    until i found out about his newsletters

    now he is anathema
    I pledge allegiance to the constitution of the United States of America as amended by the legislative and executive branches and interpreted by the Supreme Court

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

  16. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    12,386
    Thanks
    877
    Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,475 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 237 Times in 228 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post
    strange things about the shit you're saying. for example, if a company that is regulated by the FDA or the USDA sells a product that is later determined to be 'out of regulation', or modified, does the USDA or FDA incur a penalty of any kind?
    Aren't products withdrawn? When produce was shown to have been infected they were withdrawn from the market.
    "May your reality be as pleasant as mine."

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-04-2014, 05:53 PM
  2. Bill Clinton: Purdum a "Sleazy" "Slimy" "Scumbag"
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-03-2008, 07:56 AM
  3. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-01-2008, 12:26 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 08:43 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 07:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •