Reply With QuoteI am humble, but not unrealistic. You simply aren't a real challenge for me. I've wasted my time thrashing far better than you for years. You're a lamb in wolf's clothing (rather, a grade school facsimile of wolf's clothing).
Fuck You Too
Nice picture. It clearly shows what you desire.
Plain and simple Brent... My argument is rock-solid. Your argument is hopelessly lame.
I know that I go a bit over-the-top in my anger towards liars like yourself. I let anger get the better of me. You claim the high road, then try to dispatch your enemy with insults, as you are complaining about how your enemy is doing the very thing you are complaining about.
THINK.
Fuck You Too
I am humble, but not unrealistic. You simply aren't a real challenge for me. I've wasted my time thrashing far better than you for years. You're a lamb in wolf's clothing (rather, a grade school facsimile of wolf's clothing).
n00b
So what if it were? How does having a 'better argument' in a debate justify wishing to wrap your hands around my neck and strangle me, as you expressed in a PM to me?Originally Posted by Agnosticus_Caesar
Your problem, ultimately, is that you make no distinction between 'lie' and disagreement. One cannot disagree with you, and NOT be a liar, according to your logic.I know that I go a bit over-the-top in my anger towards liars like yourself. I let anger get the better of me. You claim the high road, then try to dispatch your enemy with insults, as you are complaining about how your enemy is doing the very thing you are complaining about.
THINK.
Why are you angry? Dude, this is the INTERNET. People are ALWAYS going to disagree with you. GET OVER IT, AND GET A LIFE, YOU PATHETIC LOSER!I know that I go a bit over-the-top in my anger towards liars like yourself.
Fuck You Too
rather, the very same thing you are doing.
n00b
Bullshit.
Fuck You Too
Here's a clue...when you enter into debate, you are to eschew dishonest argument tactics. Claiming "This is just the internet" is nothing more than saying that you have no honest argument, and you feel the need to engage in dishonest argument tactics so as to feel as if you are correct.
Plain and simple, Brent:
You have no serious arguments, and you hate those who actually do.
Fuck You Too
Leviticus shows that "God" condoned slavery.
You refuse to accept that FACT.
Spin your way out of that, deceiver.
Fuck You Too
Buy your Bondmen from this group of people = Condoning slavery...PERIOD.
Go back to bed.
Fuck You Too
Let the spin begin
Villified User
Brent needs to study the definitions of condone a bit....
Fuck You Too
Brent is a liar and a coward.
Atheist Missionary
So, basically, when someone believes differently than you, that person is automatically a liar?
That's not what anyone is saying. It is a matter of philosophical integrity.
You argue from a position of 'truth by authority'. You don't present any form of reasoning, you simply quote or paraphrase the bible and state that this is truth as it 'says so in the bible'.
You imply that AC is arrogant in his argument, yet there is nothing more arrogant than 'truth by authority', in the assumption that that you invest the authority (ie the bible) is infallible and that you can merely parrot the conclusion without knowing or even having any premises to support the conclusion. This is how religion and reason are incompatible, you cannot have 'truth by authority' and reason at the same time....
Last edited by AnyOldIron; 04-17-2007 at 02:48 AM.
Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Atheist Missionary
Brent is a liar and a coward.
Just young and misguided. With the number of conmen preachers in the US it isn't surprising young men like Brent, desperate to find some meaning and significance in their lives, buy into sophist arguments such as those he has.
It is, in my opinion, why the teaching of philosophy to a higher degree should be included in education, starting at a very young age.....
Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Villified User
It is, in my opinion, why the teaching of philosophy to a higher degree should be included in education, starting at a very young age.....
//
That would be books that are banned in school libraries over here.
The religious right are loud whiners.
Atheist Missionary
That would be books that are banned in school libraries over here.
Wow, what books are banned?
Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Posting Rules
Bookmarks