gfm7175 (12-13-2019)
No, it violates my rights as a person
yes, they are clearly constitutional
WRONG. The Constitution says so. You are denying the Constitution by adding stuff to it that isn't there. There were no cars in the 1700's. The Constitution does not address drunk driving at all. See the 10th amendment. The topic is about sobriety checkpoints, not drunk driving.
Presentism fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (void<->Constitution of the United States). Strawman fallacy. Redirection fallacy and fixation.
gfm7175 (12-13-2019)
I understand you don't have the freedom to drive drunk and his argument is that you can and not be punished until you hurt/kill an innocent person.
Where does the Constitution protect you entering my house without permission? My State's laws are clear about what can happen to you if you do.
Into the Night (12-11-2019)
Into the Night (12-11-2019)
gfm7175 (12-13-2019), Into the Night (12-11-2019)
Bookmarks