Reply With QuoteThread might be basically dead, but this sort of problem comes up every year about this time.Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911
Because he probably got busted, again, for a DUI.
No, it violates my rights as a person
yes, they are clearly constitutional
Verified User
Bigotry. Not everyone is intoxicated while driving.
Verified User
Thread might be basically dead, but this sort of problem comes up every year about this time.Because he probably got busted, again, for a DUI.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Did you forget that there are two sides of this coin??
1 - DUI (driving while under the influence)
and
2 - DWI (driving while intoxicated)
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
Verified User
People who are not intoxicated have no problem blowing into a breathalizer to prove they're not.
The mandated blood test is for these idiots that refuse to take one when suspected of drunk driving!
Over 50% of all fatal highway crashes involving two or more cars are alcohol related. Over 65% of all fatal single car crashes are alcohol related. Over 36% percent of all adult pedestrian accidents are alcohol related. And 10's of thousands of innocent people die each year as a result of drunk drivers.
The very next victim could be someone you love- OR YOU!
Guno צְבִי (12-09-2019)
Verified User
SCOTUS ruled that they are generally legal
Insane Level of Addiction
I believe that it is a violation if it forces you to submit. The right way to go about this is to give the drunk driver a choice; going to jail or submitting. He can always have counsel meet them at the jail house.
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Verified User
No one has the right to speed, drive drunk, run red lights, etc.
Guno צְבִי (12-09-2019)
rebel
you don't believe in rights, anyway
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
When they do, they should get pulled over. I should not have to sit in a line of cars to prove I am not drinking.
Into the Night (12-10-2019)
Verified User
Not in Michigan. They are illegal in 10 states. https://www.whitelawpllc.com/blog/20...-in-michigan-/
Verified User
So they are legal in the states that do them, but SCOTUS permits states to make the decision.
So they are not unconstitutional.
Verified User
Permits? Does not overrule them.
I got caught in one once when i had to go to the toilet big time and was a mile from home. It was horrible. I gave them the license and registration a bit rudely, wanting them to hurry,.
rebel
not everyone is a willing slave to the state, like you are.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
if you need the government to tell you what it's powers and authorities are, what the constitution means, then you're a failure as an American
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Banned
Are you saying driving drunk is OK?
Posting Rules
Bookmarks