View Poll Results: mandatory blood draws, are they constitutional?

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll
  • No, it violates my rights as a person

    25 92.59%
  • yes, they are clearly constitutional

    2 7.41%
Page 44 of 70 FirstFirst ... 3440414243444546474854 ... LastLast
Results 646 to 660 of 1050

Thread: DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

  1. #646 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,527
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,571 Times in 17,095 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Doesn’t matter whether they have them or not. They can choose not to.

    But they are constitutional.
    Do you imagine you are making a point? Michigan does not have check points.

  2. #647 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,942 Times in 11,528 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    The road isn't closed. That's what a roadblock is.
    The road was closed. You could not pass until examined by police.

  3. #648 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,998
    Thanks
    12,116
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Do you imagine you are making a point? Michigan does not have check points.
    My point is clear.

    Checkpoints are constitutional. Period.

  4. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2019)

  5. #649 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,942 Times in 11,528 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cancel 2018. 3 View Post
    i remember reading about the state of WA and the issue went all the way to their sct...and forced blood draws, with a warrant, are constitutional
    Nope. Not legal here. They are unconstitutional. A State supreme court does not have authority to change either the State constitution nor the U.S. Constitution.

  6. #650 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,942 Times in 11,528 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Doesn’t matter whether they have them or not. They can choose not to.

    But they are constitutional.
    No. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 16th amendments.

  7. #651 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,942 Times in 11,528 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    My point is clear.

    Checkpoints are constitutional. Period.
    You are chanting. Your chanting will not change the Constitution.

  8. #652 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,998
    Thanks
    12,116
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    No. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 16th amendments.
    Nope.

    Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

  9. #653 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,998
    Thanks
    12,116
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    You are chanting. Your chanting will not change the Constitution.
    Your stupidity won’t change the decision.

    Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

  10. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2019)

  11. #654 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    7,170
    Thanks
    4,088
    Thanked 3,986 Times in 2,762 Posts
    Groans
    316
    Groaned 178 Times in 173 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    No. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 16th amendments.
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Nope.

    Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)
    I'll have put this on my calendar. I actually agree with domer. Use of public roadways is not a Constitutional right. It's a privilege. If you want to use public roads, you are subject to rules. I strongly disagree with the concept of DUI checkpoints, but I concede that they are Constitutional.

  12. #655 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    The road was closed. You could not pass until examined by police.
    The road wasn't closed and there was no examination.

  13. #656 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10,846
    Thanks
    6,491
    Thanked 3,781 Times in 3,068 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 124 Times in 122 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    But STY said that if there are no victims, then there is no crime.
    Already addressed.

  14. #657 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gfm7175 View Post
    Already addressed.
    Not by STY; but he did attempt to deflect from his own mantra.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  15. #658 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,705
    Thanks
    6,598
    Thanked 12,135 Times in 9,663 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Your stupidity won’t change the decision.

    Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)
    we are not bound to obey unconstitutional laws, according to our own judgement.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Hermes Thoth For This Post:

    Into the Night (12-16-2019)

  17. #659 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,998
    Thanks
    12,116
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    we are not bound to obey unconstitutional laws, according to our own judgement.
    Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990).

    Your judgement doesn't mean shit. Tell it to the judge.


  18. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (12-16-2019)

  19. #660 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,491
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    This, coming from the idiot that stated “vehicles cannot be necessary” because they are not a right.

    After all the dumbfuck posts ever made on this forum, that still, and always will be, the stupidest fucking post EVER.

    every post you make far surpasses any i could ever make, with your dumbfuckery. anyone who needs the government to explain to them what the constitution means, is a failure as an american. any moron who claims that ONLY exact wording in the said constitution is the only thing that matters, then tries to use concepts to explain that exact wording is a total fucking idiot. That would be you, since you're too stupid to understand basic english.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-30-2013, 05:17 PM
  2. JPP Weekends
    By Cancel 2016.11 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 06-11-2013, 03:04 PM
  3. This place sucks on the weekends.
    By /MSG/ in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-08-2011, 11:57 AM
  4. drug checkpoints vs dui checkpoints
    By SmarterthanYou in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-26-2011, 07:32 PM
  5. In two weekends...
    By Damocles in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 11:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •