DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

[USFREEDOM911]

RQAA. YALIFNAP

PTSOOYA SSCALTT

[domer76]

No, they aren't. Not without cause.

Unreasonable search.

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.

1990. SCOTUS. 6-3

Read it and weep, cunt.

LSMFT

[USFREEDOM911]

YALIFNAP

SSCALTT

[USFREEDOM911]

nope. the constitution is interfering in your pre crime delusions.

And you still haven't addressed what was presented.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

And you still haven't addressed what was presented.

go shoot at children's feet, see how it works out for you, dumbass.

[USFREEDOM911]

go shoot at children's feet, see how it works out for you, dumbass.

NO VICTIM = NO CRIME, RIGHT??

[RB 60]

YALIFNAP

PTSOOYA

Are you guys speaking in Swahili again? Us old white Americans don't understand it

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

NO VICTIM = NO CRIME, RIGHT??

assinine, but go try it out.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

you know 9/11 was an inside job led by cheney to bolster the military industrial complex, right?

[USFREEDOM911]

assinine, but go try it out.

I see you're unable to discuss the premise behind my comment and instead just want to emote!!

Does that normally work out for you, when you have nothing else to offer??

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

I see you're unable to discuss the premise behind my comment and instead just want to emote!!

Does that normally work out for you, when you have nothing else to offer??

go shoot at children's feet, then have the cops that come explain it to you.

[USFREEDOM911]

go shoot at children's feet, then have the cops that come explain it to you.

You are so caught up in NEEDING to be correct, that you aren't able to comprehend that my presentation was a challenge to DTY's comment of "NO VICTIM / NO CRIME".

So instead of discussing what he believes, you instead just want to sit in a corner, stick your fingers in your ears, and constantly repeat "NEENER-NEENER-NEENER"

OH-WAIT; do you really believe that as long as there's no victim, then there's no crime??

Because if that's your stance, then there's no reason for stop signs, stop lights, speed limit laws, among a multitude of things.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

You are so caught up in NEEDING to be correct, that you aren't able to comprehend that my presentation was a challenge to DTY's comment of "NO VICTIM / NO CRIME".

So instead of discussing what he believes, you instead just want to sit in a corner, stick your fingers in your ears, and constantly repeat "NEENER-NEENER-NEENER"

OH-WAIT; do you really believe that as long as there's no victim, then there's no crime??

Because if that's your stance, then there's no reason for stop signs, stop lights, speed limit laws, among a multitude of things.

you're an idiot. please go attempt your stunt, and then tell the cops its a victimless crime. and then respect the constitution, fake patriot.

[Nordberg]

The assumption is that road checks are about stopping drivers instead of revenue. What does check lanes accomplish? It is a good use of taxpayer's money? Is it an efficient and reasonable way to cut crime. Does it work and where are the stats?
We know that it is impinging of people's rights to improper stop and seizure. We have a right to go along with our lives without dealing with police power being shoved in our faces. You stop me, you should have a reason not just taking a flyer.

[USFREEDOM911]

you're an idiot. please go attempt your stunt, and then tell the cops its a victimless crime. and then respect the constitution, fake patriot.

And you still can't do anything but emote, more's the pity.

If you truly believe that no victim means no crime, then why are you trying to promote that I'm wrong??

If no one is hurt, then who's the victim and why would it be a crime.

I honestly don't expect you to provide anything in the way of common sense of a reply and instead am enjoying watching you floundering in confusion.