Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: Man who wrote 'how-to' for pedophiles arrested

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post
    yes you are, yes they do. that doesn't change anything constitutionally. you should try and really learn it sometime instead of staying on your knees in front of your boys in blue.
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    Now STY has to resort to making it appear that I posted something, when the truth is; it is now obvious that the only reason the militia keeps him around, is because he's fun to laugh at and he gives good blow jobs.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,620
    Thanks
    65,436
    Thanked 38,186 Times in 25,721 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Immanuel View Post
    As much as I agree with you in regards to this being obscene, there is a heck of a lot of obscenity on the internet. Should we shut down the internet as well? Maybe that is more drastic than what you state. Maybe we should simply go after all the porn providers on the internet? Arrest them and throw them in jail right alongside the dope dealers and this pervert.

    Yes, I expect the book may very well be obscene. I choose not to read it. To "turn the channel" so to speak since I am not interested in the information. Yes, anyone caught putting any of those "How to's" to practice should be strung up and castrated to start with... but, when I think of the government arresting someone for writing a book I am concerned as to where that will lead.

    Obscenity is in the eye of the beholder. Yes, IMHO, this is obscenity. Some people claim the Song of Solomon is obscene. Shall we burn it as well?

    Immie
    Obscenity re: adults is way different from obscenity involving defenseless children.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces New Mexico
    Posts
    10,656
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 1,630 Times in 874 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 39 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,128
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Obscenity re: adults is way different from obscenity involving defenseless children.
    I have no argument against you here.

    I think my hang-up here is the way the sheriff in my neighboring county is going after this guy. It seems like he is campaigning for political office as opposed to prosecuting the law. If he were simply prosecuting the law, I would not have so much of a problem with this. Hey, you break the law then you do the time. But, I swear this sheriff seems to be campaigning for Attorney General of the U.S. at the moment.

    It appears, that it can be said that this book verges (remember I have not actually read the book) on child porn which is a crime. And if it does, then fine prosecute him, but damnit don't seek to further your political career while doing so.

    Immie
    Here's to the end of our two leading "tyrannical" political parties and the restoration of our government of the people, by the people, for the people.

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    Now I have to resort to making it appear that STY posted something, when the truth is; it is now obvious that the only reason I stick around, is because I'm fun to laugh at and give good blow jobs.
    fixed that for you.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrtease View Post
    This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.
    yep...bolded it in post 15

    great minds think alike

  7. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrtease View Post
    This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.
    The government may suppress speech for advocating the use of force or a violation of law only if “such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 447 (1969)

    how is that a show of a failed case?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  8. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post
    fixed that for you.
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    I have now reduced STY to being even a bigger troll, then he already was.

    I LOVE IT; because it continues to prove my point that he's an idiot.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    HEY STY; hurry up and change this one, also.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  9. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,620
    Thanks
    65,436
    Thanked 38,186 Times in 25,721 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Immanuel View Post
    I have no argument against you here.

    I think my hang-up here is the way the sheriff in my neighboring county is going after this guy. It seems like he is campaigning for political office as opposed to prosecuting the law. If he were simply prosecuting the law, I would not have so much of a problem with this. Hey, you break the law then you do the time. But, I swear this sheriff seems to be campaigning for Attorney General of the U.S. at the moment.

    It appears, that it can be said that this book verges (remember I have not actually read the book) on child porn which is a crime. And if it does, then fine prosecute him, but damnit don't seek to further your political career while doing so.

    Immie
    The more I think this over...

    Years ago I read Lolita and although the "ick" factor was present, it didn't bother me the same way this book does, should say the idea of this book, because I haven't read it either.

    Maybe it's the idea of fiction vs. non-fiction?

    I agree with you about the sheriff using the book to further his political career. There's an "ick" factor in that as well.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  10. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    I have now reduced STY to being even a bigger troll, then he already was.

    I LOVE IT; because it continues to prove my point that he's an idiot.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    HEY STY; hurry up and change this one, also.


    you're the other side of taichiliberal, aren't you? totally oblivious and ignorant.

    so very sad.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  11. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post


    you're the other side of taichiliberal, aren't you? totally oblivious and ignorant.

    so very sad.
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    You just can't stand it, that I've exposed you as nothing more then just a big ole crybaby.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  12. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    You just can't stand it, that I've exposed you as nothing more then just a big ole crybaby.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA


    you wish.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  13. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    The more I think this over...

    Years ago I read Lolita and although the "ick" factor was present, it didn't bother me the same way this book does, should say the idea of this book, because I haven't read it either.

    Maybe it's the idea of fiction vs. non-fiction?

    I agree with you about the sheriff using the book to further his political career. There's an "ick" factor in that as well.
    interesting points, i saw the movie and i think the difference here is age and method....this book is about manipulating very young children and their families so that you can force yourself upon small children and get away with it...has nothing to do with mutual love/lust (assumption of the movie) of a 14 year old girl who as the book says, initiated or made advances to him as well....

    this book is clearly about getting away with molesting very young children and how to avoid capture

  14. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    interesting points, i saw the movie and i think the difference here is age and method....this book is about manipulating very young children and their families so that you can force yourself upon small children and get away with it...has nothing to do with mutual love/lust (assumption of the movie) of a 14 year old girl who as the book says, initiated or made advances to him as well....

    this book is clearly about getting away with molesting very young children and how to avoid capture
    would it then be safe to say that if I wrote a book about how to manufacture an automatic seer for an AR15, that I should be arrested?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  15. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post


    you wish.
    And even more proof that I've succeeded.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 04-14-2010, 06:33 AM
  2. YOU ARE ALL PEDOPHILES
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 10:08 AM
  3. pedophiles and the lasting damage that they leave behind them
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 12:02 AM
  4. A party of pedophiles and perverts
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 02:47 PM
  5. Republicans defend pedophiles
    By Connecticut Stud in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 08:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •