SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.
I have no argument against you here.
I think my hang-up here is the way the sheriff in my neighboring county is going after this guy. It seems like he is campaigning for political office as opposed to prosecuting the law. If he were simply prosecuting the law, I would not have so much of a problem with this. Hey, you break the law then you do the time. But, I swear this sheriff seems to be campaigning for Attorney General of the U.S. at the moment.
It appears, that it can be said that this book verges (remember I have not actually read the book) on child porn which is a crime. And if it does, then fine prosecute him, but damnit don't seek to further your political career while doing so.
Immie
Here's to the end of our two leading "tyrannical" political parties and the restoration of our government of the people, by the people, for the people.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
The government may suppress speech for advocating the use of force or a violation of law only if “such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 447 (1969)
how is that a show of a failed case?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
The more I think this over...
Years ago I read Lolita and although the "ick" factor was present, it didn't bother me the same way this book does, should say the idea of this book, because I haven't read it either.
Maybe it's the idea of fiction vs. non-fiction?
I agree with you about the sheriff using the book to further his political career. There's an "ick" factor in that as well.
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
interesting points, i saw the movie and i think the difference here is age and method....this book is about manipulating very young children and their families so that you can force yourself upon small children and get away with it...has nothing to do with mutual love/lust (assumption of the movie) of a 14 year old girl who as the book says, initiated or made advances to him as well....
this book is clearly about getting away with molesting very young children and how to avoid capture
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks