Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: VA Republican claims TSA patdowns are part of a "homosexual agenda"

  1. #1 | Top
    WinterBorn Guest

    Default VA Republican claims TSA patdowns are part of a "homosexual agenda"

    http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=2182930

    I laughed out loud!! And this guy was elected to a public post?

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    6,269
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    maybe suddenly there will be an influx of new TSA worker applications and a drop in catholic priest applications.
    Q: Senator Obama, would you take the same pledge? No tax increases on people under $250,000?

    OBAMA: I not only have pledged not to raise their taxes, I've been the first candidate in this race to specifically say I would cut their taxes.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chapdog View Post
    maybe suddenly there will be an influx of new TSA worker applications and a drop in catholic priest applications.
    Haha! Might be a good way to catch child predators who think they can do it legally now.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    The selected quotes from the alleged email makes this guy look like a fool and a nut.
    I'd sure like to see the entire email to keep everything in context....its amazing he would be so stupid as to make these remarks in the first place.
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,457
    Thanks
    340
    Thanked 614 Times in 494 Posts
    Groans
    148
    Groaned 510 Times in 418 Posts

    Default

    :lol:

    Eugene Delgaudio currently represents the Sterling District on the Loudoun County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,703
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chapdog View Post
    maybe suddenly there will be an influx of new TSA worker applications and a drop in catholic priest applications.
    dying here!

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,703
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinterBorn View Post
    http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=2182930

    I laughed out loud!! And this guy was elected to a public post?
    http://nation.foxnews.com/justice/20...awmaker-claims

    It must be true, I verified it on Fox Nation!

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,625
    Thanks
    65,445
    Thanked 38,188 Times in 25,723 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    http://nation.foxnews.com/justice/20...awmaker-claims

    It must be true, I verified it on Fox Nation!
    These anti-gay nuts are coming out of the woodwork. Check this rant:


    December 1, 2010
    Don’t hint, don’t wink: An immodest proposal

    What does all this have to do with force readiness and “Don’t-hint-don’t-wink” or whatever they’re calling it these days? My answer should by now be as painfully obvious as a suppurating genital rash: gays spread disease at a rate out of all proportion to their numbers in our population and should be excluded from the military. Gone are those happy days when a cheerful medic could give you a “pro shot” — a massive dose of antibiotic — before your wild weekend that would protect you from the consequences of every folly, unless you got mugged. Herpes and AIDS are infectious and chronic and the latter, despite advancements in lengthening and improving the lives of its sufferers, will eventually kill you as dead as a bullet in your brain unless something else gets you first. The military has depended on “blood on the hoof” — transfusions from live donor to live recipient — ever since transfusions were perfected by the discovery of blood groups in 1901. A significant population of gays in the military has the potential for disastrous health consequences.

    Let’s remember that we’re not talking about a significant fraction of our population. Kinsey’s notorious World War II-era study concluded that about 10% of adult males in the United States were homosexual. Never considered in his study was the fact that most able-bodied American male heterosexuals were elsewhere, serving as part of The Greatest Generation, leaving a larger percentage of gays at home to keep one another contented. Later studies have almost universally concluded that the percentage of gays in our male population is between 1% and 6%. The recent National Health and Social Life Survey put the figure at 2.5%. The percentage of lesbians is estimated to be between 0.5% and 3%.

    Finally, most gays are not inclined toward military service, but many lesbians
    are, and it is an open secret that they do well in the calling, especially in medical and administrative specialties. I am certain that I knew some during my 20 years in the Army, although I didn’t ask and they didn’t tell. In the era of conscription, gays had two options: lie and be inducted, or “come out” to be branded and rejected. It was a wretched choice that produced desperately unhappy men. I served alongside one such man in Vietnam.

    Now back to that communal shower. It’s no secret that men are generally much more susceptible to sexual arousal through visual stimuli than are most women. Many gays will deny that this is the case with them, but why then is the Internet saturated with gay porn? I don’t claim to be a Constitutional law scholar on a par with President Obama, but shouldn’t the overwhelmingly straight warriors who answer their county’s call be spared the indignity of showering with other men who achieve lascivious enjoyment from the sight of those lithe naked bodies, and who may be tempted to seek more than the view? They are, after all, guys. If a Constitutional right to privacy that guarantees access to abortionists can be summoned from thin air, certainly the prohibition against involuntary servitude should prevent unwilling heterosexual men from providing beefcake parades without their informed consent, at least penumbrally.

    Joseph A. Rehyansky is retired from the United States Army and the Chattanooga, Tennessee, District Attorney’ Office. He is a former contributor to National Review whose writings have also appeared in Human Events Online, The American Spectator, and other publications.


    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/11/22/do...#ixzz16to6IQKc


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smarter Than All Y'All View Post
    Is Larry Craig volunteering to be patted down?
    And Barney Frank is putting on his rubber gloves as we speak..
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,703
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bravo View Post
    And Barney Frank is putting on his rubber gloves as we speak..
    and looking for your ass!

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,196
    Thanks
    9,840
    Thanked 33,900 Times in 21,663 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinterBorn View Post
    http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=2182930

    I laughed out loud!! And this guy was elected to a public post?
    Its no more funny than GWB getting elected president.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinterBorn View Post
    http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=2182930

    I laughed out loud!! And this guy was elected to a public post?
    Yea well I have no doubt that shit plays real well with the rural constituents who never fly anywhere anyways.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    These anti-gay nuts are coming out of the woodwork. Check this rant:


    December 1, 2010
    Don’t hint, don’t wink: An immodest proposal

    What does all this have to do with force readiness and “Don’t-hint-don’t-wink” or whatever they’re calling it these days? My answer should by now be as painfully obvious as a suppurating genital rash: gays spread disease at a rate out of all proportion to their numbers in our population and should be excluded from the military. Gone are those happy days when a cheerful medic could give you a “pro shot” — a massive dose of antibiotic — before your wild weekend that would protect you from the consequences of every folly, unless you got mugged. Herpes and AIDS are infectious and chronic and the latter, despite advancements in lengthening and improving the lives of its sufferers, will eventually kill you as dead as a bullet in your brain unless something else gets you first. The military has depended on “blood on the hoof” — transfusions from live donor to live recipient — ever since transfusions were perfected by the discovery of blood groups in 1901. A significant population of gays in the military has the potential for disastrous health consequences.

    Let’s remember that we’re not talking about a significant fraction of our population. Kinsey’s notorious World War II-era study concluded that about 10% of adult males in the United States were homosexual. Never considered in his study was the fact that most able-bodied American male heterosexuals were elsewhere, serving as part of The Greatest Generation, leaving a larger percentage of gays at home to keep one another contented. Later studies have almost universally concluded that the percentage of gays in our male population is between 1% and 6%. The recent National Health and Social Life Survey put the figure at 2.5%. The percentage of lesbians is estimated to be between 0.5% and 3%.

    Finally, most gays are not inclined toward military service, but many lesbians
    are, and it is an open secret that they do well in the calling, especially in medical and administrative specialties. I am certain that I knew some during my 20 years in the Army, although I didn’t ask and they didn’t tell. In the era of conscription, gays had two options: lie and be inducted, or “come out” to be branded and rejected. It was a wretched choice that produced desperately unhappy men. I served alongside one such man in Vietnam.

    Now back to that communal shower. It’s no secret that men are generally much more susceptible to sexual arousal through visual stimuli than are most women. Many gays will deny that this is the case with them, but why then is the Internet saturated with gay porn? I don’t claim to be a Constitutional law scholar on a par with President Obama, but shouldn’t the overwhelmingly straight warriors who answer their county’s call be spared the indignity of showering with other men who achieve lascivious enjoyment from the sight of those lithe naked bodies, and who may be tempted to seek more than the view? They are, after all, guys. If a Constitutional right to privacy that guarantees access to abortionists can be summoned from thin air, certainly the prohibition against involuntary servitude should prevent unwilling heterosexual men from providing beefcake parades without their informed consent, at least penumbrally.

    Joseph A. Rehyansky is retired from the United States Army and the Chattanooga, Tennessee, District Attorney’ Office. He is a former contributor to National Review whose writings have also appeared in Human Events Online, The American Spectator, and other publications.


    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/11/22/do...#ixzz16to6IQKc
    Wow....I can't remember the last time I read something so profoundly ignorant. How the hell did a mouth breather that stupid ever get through law school?
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Wow....I can't remember the last time I read something so profoundly ignorant. How the hell did a mouth breather that stupid ever get through law school?
    Judging by the counselors we have on JPP, (and in Washington, DC) this one was most likely at the top of his class...
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    and looking for your ass!
    Bravo likes his rough trade bareback....

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 162
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 08:30 AM
  2. Majority of voters say dem agenda "extreme"
    By Canceled2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 08:39 PM
  3. Yawner: Ricky Martin "i'm a homosexual"
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-30-2010, 02:03 PM
  4. Arnold "Claims" 150,000 Stimulus Jobs Created in Cali
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 03-03-2010, 04:08 PM
  5. Replies: 94
    Last Post: 09-07-2009, 04:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •