Obama's Endgame~~~

[Canceled2]

Zoom's MO. Scream loud, long, and ad nauseum used to net him the results he breathes for. He called it "respect", everyone else called it "giving the unhinged lunatic wide berth".

Anger issues to the umpteenth degree.

He's blinded by his anger

[Good Luck]

Did you watch the video? If so, you must have missed the part where Born wanted to investigate fraud and Greenspan believed the market would look after it. Greenspan even testified before Congress that he was wrong, wrong in his beliefs about the market for the majority of his professional life.



Is Greenspan a liar and a liberal anti-capitalist, as well?

Try doing some research instead of talking about things you know nothing about.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

LOL Yea, you take an opinion piece based on someone's testimony, call it truth, and then say I am the one who did not do any research?

Did you read the laws I referenced for you? Did you even so much as click on the links? Who is it that is not doing research?

When I hear people making claims about laws, I go look up the laws. THAT is how one determines truth, not from people testifying before Congress. The laws are there for you to research. Look it up. See what FTC regulations have to say about selling loan assets as investments. Look at what federal regulations say about what banks are required to report in their quarterly fiscal statements. Look at what CRA regulations require for reporting, as well as what types of loans are required in what kinds of ratios for a bank to meet CRA standards.

In short, try actually educating yourself of the real facts - especially before accusing someone who HAS done those things of not doing their research.

[christiefan915]

You know, I call this guy, "Mr. Smart Guy."

He takes the time to write a lot of nothing.

SM,,,,, His avatar is perfect for him. Don't be nice. He's unlearnable if you ask me.

You're right that he's a smart guy. Actually, he's brilliant.

[DamnYankee]

You're right that he's a smart guy. Actually, he's brilliant.

So smart that he can't put a logical paragraph together.

[Liberty]

You're right that he's a smart guy. Actually, he's brilliant.

You're kidding. Right?

[zoombwaz]

LOL

OK Mr. Intellectual Highbrow, tell me how the "Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act" (2003) is authorized by the Constitution.

Foirst, let me say that it sucks, as it's a giant giveaway to Big Pharma, but it is Constitutional under Article 1, Section 8, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 17, and 18. It helps if you can read for comprehension. That's the first unanswered post,

[DamnYankee]

Foirst, let me say that it sucks, as it's a giant giveaway to Big Pharma, but it is Constitutional under Article 1, Section 8, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 17, and 18. It helps if you can read for comprehension. That's the first unanswered post,

Here's Article I Section 8 in its entirety:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and
Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Clause 1:

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

Clause 2:

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,
and with the Indian Tribes;

Clause 3:

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the
subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

Clause 4:

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix
the Standard of Weights and Measures;

Clause 5:

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and
current Coin of the United States;

Clause 6:

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

Clause 7:

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for
limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their
respective Writings and Discoveries;

Clause 8:

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

Clause 9:

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas,
and Offences against the Law of Nations;

Clause 10:

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules
concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Clause 11:

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use
shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

Clause 12:

To provide and maintain a Navy;

Clause 13:

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval
Forces;

Clause 14:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the
Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Clause 15:

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and
for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the
United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of
the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the
discipline prescribed by Congress;

Clause 16:

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of
particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of
the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over
all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in
which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals,
dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And

Clause 17:

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into
Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this
Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any
Department or Officer thereof.

This proves you wrong.

[zoombwaz]

Here's Article I Section 8 in its entirety:



This proves you wrong.

Hardly. The paragraphs I quoted bear directly on the law in question,specifically the interstate commerce clause, and providing for the general welfare of the United States. Medicare Part D is well withing the scope of Congress's powers and is not specifically proscribed in any other section of the Constitution.

Clutch those straws!!

[zoombwaz]

He's blinded by his anger

You two morons haven't gotten any smarter since you left the WOT board. Same old bullshit. same old ignorance. Speaking of ignorance, what was that ridiculous comment on my rep list? "Right back atcha, asshole," or some such idiocy. You equated my use of the word "foist" to your consistent spelling error on "masturbate." There is only one problem with that: unlike your word "mastrubate" [sic], foist is a real word. From dictionary.com: foist; verb

1. to force upon or impose fraudulently or unjustifiably (usually fol. by on or upon ): to foist inferior merchandise on a customer.
2. to bring, put, or introduce surreptitiously or fraudulently (usually fol. by in or into ): to foist political views into a news story.

You two will never learn, will you? BTW, better blinded by anger than by stupidity. Anger passes. Stupidity is forever.

"You can't fix stupid" Ron White

[zoombwaz]

So smart that he can't put a logical paragraph together.

That must be why I majored in philosophy and never received less than an A in a logic course. You, on the other hand, wouldn't know a valid argument if it bit you on the ass, and several of mine have. done just that.

Keep waving that rubber knife.

[zoombwaz]

It must suck to be that old and still not grown out of youthful stupidity.

Yes, it must truly suck for such unfortunates, like the two harpies currently blithering about my "anger issues." You know what they say about amateur psychologists diagnosing someone they've never met: the diagnosis is free and yet not worth the price. So tell me, how badly does it suck? I wouldn't know.

[Phantasmal]

Yes, it must truly suck for such unfortunates, like the two harpies currently blithering about my "anger issues." You know what they say about amateur psychologists diagnosing someone they've never met: the diagnosis is free and yet not worth the price. So tell me, how badly does it suck? I wouldn't know.

Zoom,

They have not addressed your post, they just attack you, same fertilizer, different day!

I would like to see an honest discussion of your points, just once, it won't happen.

[DamnYankee]

Hardly. The paragraphs I quoted bear directly on the law in question,specifically the interstate commerce clause, and providing for the general welfare of the United States. Medicare Part D is well withing the scope of Congress's powers and is not specifically proscribed in any other section of the Constitution.

Clutch those straws!!

No they don't. Stop lying. "general welfare of the United States" doesn't mean "give money to people". Do you know the difference between a Person and a State?

[DamnYankee]

Zoom,

They have not addressed your post, they just attack you, same fertilizer, different day!

I would like to see an honest discussion of your points, just once, it won't happen.

Again lib-babe, you are FOS here. I've ax'd Zoom several questions in several different threads over several weeks that he's ignored and tried to run from. Only recently after highlighting this fact has he finally responded. And I've responded back with logic and reason to every one. Now he's in a tizzy.

Watch him spin now.