Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Immigration reform 2

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default Immigration reform 2

    Since some individuals have been very vocal about what they DON'T LIKE, regarding Arizona's new law (which appears to be ready to be adopted by some other States); I thought I would try to ask the following question:

    What do you support, regarding immigration?
    *please try to be as specific as possible and avoid generalizations that result in nothing*
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Since some individuals have been very vocal about what they DON'T LIKE, regarding Arizona's new law (which appears to be ready to be adopted by some other States); I thought I would try to ask the following question:

    What do you support, regarding immigration?
    *please try to be as specific as possible and avoid generalizations that result in nothing*
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    16,205
    Thanks
    11,004
    Thanked 19,617 Times in 9,138 Posts
    Groans
    1,451
    Groaned 1,428 Times in 1,257 Posts

    Default Gov Brewer's Nightmare

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Since some individuals have been very vocal about what they DON'T LIKE, regarding Arizona's new law (which appears to be ready to be adopted by some other States); I thought I would try to ask the following question:

    What do you support, regarding immigration?
    *please try to be as specific as possible and avoid generalizations that result in nothing*

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    We’re going to come back, we’re going to have comprehensive immigration reform now.

    I supported S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006, which the Senate passed with a strong bipartisan vote in the 109th Congress. Unfortunately, the Republican leadership of the House of Representatives refused to work with the Senate to reconcile the differences in our two bills, so we were unable to enact reform that year. In 2007, I supported S. 1639, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act. I was very disappointed when opponents of this bill blocked it from coming up for a vote. By doing nothing, our country is left with the same problems that have plagued our broken immigration system for years.

    I remain committed to comprehensive immigration reform and hope that we are able to enact it soon.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Since some individuals have been very vocal about what they DON'T LIKE, regarding Arizona's new law (which appears to be ready to be adopted by some other States); I thought I would try to ask the following question:

    What do you support, regarding immigration?
    *please try to be as specific as possible and avoid generalizations that result in nothing*

    Looks like a I hit a nerve, with this one; because the libtards are avoiding this like a vampire cringing from garlic.

    It is now obvious that the libtards are unable to put their money where there mouth is.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    No se resuelve con alguna queja diplomática y menos con el silencio que hasta ahora a adoptado el gobierno mexicano y la Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores, el caso es tan grave que debería llamar el gobierno mexicano a nuestro embajador para tener un informe completo y por lo tanto exigir al gobierno de los Estados Unidos se castigue a los responsables.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Felipe Calderón Hinojosa View Post
    No se resuelve con alguna queja diplomática y menos con el silencio que hasta ahora a adoptado el gobierno mexicano y la Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores, el caso es tan grave que debería llamar el gobierno mexicano a nuestro embajador para tener un informe completo y por lo tanto exigir al gobierno de los Estados Unidos se castigue a los responsables.
    This is the translation of your stupidity:

    "It is not solved with some diplomatic complaint and less with silence than until now to adopted the Mexican government and the Secretariat of Outer Relations, the case is so serious that it would have to call the Mexican government to our ambassador to have a complete report and therefore to demand the government of the United States is punished the people in charge."

    And now, I'm curious; what the fuck does this have to do with the question??

    Aspire el dick y vaya venta su madre en una esquina de calle.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    This is the translation of your stupidity:

    "It is not solved with some diplomatic complaint and less with silence than until now to adopted the Mexican government and the Secretariat of Outer Relations, the case is so serious that it would have to call the Mexican government to our ambassador to have a complete report and therefore to demand the government of the United States is punished the people in charge."

    And now, I'm curious; what the fuck does this have to do with the question??

    Aspire el dick y vaya venta su madre en una esquina de calle.
    Putting a complicated statement through google translate rarely produces an intelligible result.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

Similar Threads

  1. Immigration reform 1
    By DeMartMan in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 06-04-2010, 06:04 PM
  2. We can get immigration reform done
    By Canceled.LTroll.8 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-28-2010, 09:18 PM
  3. Proven Reform: After healthcare reform in Mass, costs now HIGHEST in nation!
    By KingCondanomation in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 02:30 PM
  4. The Left and Immigration Reform
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 06-14-2007, 09:35 AM
  5. Immigration
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 11:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •