Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: The "Climate Gate" conspiracy theory: Game Over

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    7,910
    Thanks
    4,120
    Thanked 2,784 Times in 2,203 Posts
    Groans
    40
    Groaned 92 Times in 91 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    I have given you a full definition of fossil fuel, several times. It is not claiming they burn fossils... But actually, in a hyper technical sense they do. You do not seem to know what a fossil is.
    Fossils are not being burned, moron... You have not defined what you mean by 'fossil fuel'.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    34,702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17,015 Times in 10,774 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,752 Times in 2,566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gfm7175 View Post
    Fossils are not being burned, moron... You have not defined what you mean by 'fossil fuel'.
    Always a give away when the “pidgin” has to turn the exchange into one over semantics, “but you said ……..,” next we’ll get the Google glossary of fallacies

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    7,910
    Thanks
    4,120
    Thanked 2,784 Times in 2,203 Posts
    Groans
    40
    Groaned 92 Times in 91 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Always a give away when the “pidgin” has to turn the exchange into one over semantics, “but you said ……..,” next we’ll get the Google glossary of fallacies
    So you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion??

    Thought so.

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    34,702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17,015 Times in 10,774 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,752 Times in 2,566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gfm7175 View Post
    So you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion??

    Thought so.
    Why would I, anyone for that matter, you eagerly swallowed the false paradigm propagandized by the energy companies and now are echoing the same, seen it all, been there before, like playing a game of tic tac toe, pointless

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    7,910
    Thanks
    4,120
    Thanked 2,784 Times in 2,203 Posts
    Groans
    40
    Groaned 92 Times in 91 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Why would I, anyone for that matter, you eagerly swallowed the false paradigm propagandized by the energy companies and now are echoing the same, seen it all, been there before, like playing a game of tic tac toe, pointless
    What are you even talking about?

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    34,702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17,015 Times in 10,774 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,752 Times in 2,566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gfm7175 View Post
    What are you even talking about?
    Here we go with the semantics again, predictable, rather not play that game, again, here, I’ll just leave you with those who put a on the moon, a controllable rover and robot on Mars, think of the reality of man made climate change:

    https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warm...limate-change/

  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    7,910
    Thanks
    4,120
    Thanked 2,784 Times in 2,203 Posts
    Groans
    40
    Groaned 92 Times in 91 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Here we go with the semantics again, predictable, rather not play that game, again, here, I’ll just leave you with those who put a on the moon, a controllable rover and robot on Mars, think of the reality of man made climate change:

    https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
    https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warm...limate-change/
    NASA is not science. Learn how to answer a simple fucking question for a change.

    What is this "false paradigm propagandized by the energy companies" that I have supposedly swallowed? I have no idea what you are talking about. You should be able to substantiate your claim, if it holds any meaning at all... It is quite obvious why you can't substantiate it...

  8. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    68,179
    Thanks
    110,560
    Thanked 59,405 Times in 38,423 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,320 Times in 4,054 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    There is a contingent of MAGA who finally and belatedly admitted that burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming, but they claim it won't really cause any serious problems.
    Kentucky.
    "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness. -- Oscar Wilde

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    Cypress (08-08-2022)

Similar Threads

  1. "Climate Gate": The Lion that Squeaked Like a Mouse
    By Cypress in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-17-2010, 02:50 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 10:15 PM
  3. "Sweetie-Gate"...
    By Damocles in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-16-2008, 06:58 AM
  4. Is it "global warming" now--or is it "climate change"?
    By theMAJORITY in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-01-2008, 07:13 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-01-2007, 12:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •